Studies on Staphylococcus aureus Infection in rabbit farms

Document Type : Original researches

Abstract

The present study was carried out to spotlight on the presence of Staphylococcus aureus (Staph aureus) among rabbit farm and to characterize the bacterial isolates for the presence of blaZ, coa, mecA, tetK and nuc gene, It also aimed to demonstrate the antimicrobial susceptibility of S. aureus in vitro and detect its pathogenicity in weaned rabbits. A total of 426 samples were collected included 98, 257 and 71 samples from apparently healthy rabbit, diseased rabbits and freshly dead rabbits. Staph aureus was isolated in 20(20.4%) out of 98 apparently healthy rabbits, 78(30.4%) out of 257 diseased rabbit and 22(31%) out of 71 dead rabbits and its presence was confirmed through cultural and biochemical characterization. Multiplex PCR was performed on the isolated strains of S. aureus which showed the presence of blaZ, coa, mecA, tetK and nuc virulent genes. All isolates were positive for the gene coa, mecA, tetK and nuc virulent genes. This results indicates that the coagulase-positive of S. aureus was the most predominant cause of skin disease in rabbits disease and carried the mecA and nuc virulent gene. Antibiotic sensitivity against conventional antimicrobials revealed that Staphylococcus aureus strains were sensitive to streptomycine (70%) and penicillin, gentamycin   (63.3%) in addition to doxycycline (60%) and resistance to ciprofloxacin and Amoxicillin (75%). As well, high degree of resistance to Trimethoprim /Sulphathoxazol, Cefotaxime, Cephradin (100%) and Colstine sulphate were detected 72.3%. The pathogenicity test conducted on of 5 week old weaned rabbits showed that S. aureus was highly pathogenic resulting in mortality rates of 65 and 35%, respectively. The rabbits exhibited septicaemia with congestion and peticheal hemorrhage throughout the intestine, sever congestion of the liver, spleen and kidneys,as well as the congestion of the intestine blood vessels and lung. Pneumonia or abscesses were also observed in the lungs or heart. Histopathological changes supported the so observed lesions. In conclusion, the detection of S. aurues virulent genes with overlapping functions and the reproduction of antibiotic resistance genes in the Egyptian field is very importance additionally, in vivo pathogenicity studies. S. aureus was identified as the most significant pathogen causing death of rabbits in rabbit farms. Therefore, accurate, rapid and molecular diagnostic methods of must be implemented. Finally, it is essential to conduct in vitro sensitivity tests of S. aurues to different antimicrobial agents due to the observed resistance to the commonly used antibiotics for prevention and control S. aureus in rabbits.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Studies on Staphylococcus aureus Infection in rabbit farms

1Rehab E. Dawod, *2 Ahmed Attya and 3Nagah Arafat

1Rehab E. Dawod: Senior Researcher of Bacteriology at Animal Health Institute (Damietta branch), Agriculture Research Center, Egypt (re7ab_re@yahoo.com).

2Ahmed Attya: Researcher of Pathology at Animal Health Institute (Damietta branch), Agriculture Research Center, Egypt (ahmedattya.2010@yahoo.com).

3Nagah Arafat: Professor of Poultry Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt (nagaharafat@yahoo.com).

Abstract

The present study was carried out to spotlight on the presence of Staphylococcus aureus (Staph aureus) among rabbit farm and to characterize the bacterial isolates for the presence of blaZ, coa, mecA, tetK and nuc gene, It also aimed to demonstrate the antimicrobial susceptibility of S. aureus in vitro and detect its pathogenicity in weaned rabbits. A total of 426 samples were collected included 98, 257 and 71 samples from apparently healthy rabbit, diseased rabbits and freshly dead rabbits. Staph aureus was isolated in 20(20.4%) out of 98 apparently healthy rabbits, 78(30.4%) out of 257 diseased rabbit and 22(31%) out of 71 dead rabbits and its presence was confirmed through cultural and biochemical characterization. Multiplex PCR was performed on the isolated strains of S. aureus which showed the presence of blaZ, coa, mecA, tetK and nuc virulent genes. All isolates were positive for the gene coa, mecA, tetK and nuc virulent genes. This results indicates that the coagulase-positive of S. aureus was the most predominant cause of skin disease in rabbits disease and carried the mecA and nuc virulent gene. Antibiotic sensitivity against conventional antimicrobials revealed that Staphylococcus aureus strains were sensitive to streptomycine (70%) and penicillin, gentamycin   (63.3%) in addition to doxycycline (60%) and resistance to ciprofloxacin and Amoxicillin (75%). As well, high degree of resistance to Trimethoprim /Sulphathoxazol, Cefotaxime, Cephradin (100%) and Colstine sulphate were detected 72.3%. The pathogenicity test conducted on of 5 week old weaned rabbits showed that S. aureus was highly pathogenic resulting in mortality rates of 65 and 35%, respectively. The rabbits exhibited septicaemia with congestion and peticheal hemorrhage throughout the intestine, sever congestion of the liver, spleen and kidneys,as well as the congestion of the intestine blood vessels and lung. Pneumonia or abscesses were also observed in the lungs or heart. Histopathological changes supported the so observed lesions. In conclusion, the detection of S. aurues virulent genes with overlapping functions and the reproduction of antibiotic resistance genes in the Egyptian field is very importance additionally, in vivo pathogenicity studies. S. aureus was identified as the most significant pathogen causing death of rabbits in rabbit farms. Therefore, accurate, rapid and molecular diagnostic methods of must be implemented. Finally, it is essential to conduct in vitro sensitivity tests of S. aurues to different antimicrobial agents due to the observed resistance to the commonly used antibiotics for prevention and control S. aureus in rabbits.

Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, rabbit, genes, PCR, Antimicrobials, pathogenicity.

Introduction

Staphylococci are Gram-positive bacteria, non-motile, non-spore forming with diameters of 0.5 – 1.5 μm. They are facultative anaerobes that grow by aerobic respiration or by fermentation. Staphylococci are characterized by individual cocci, which divide in more than one plane to form grape-like clusters (Wilkinson. 1997).  there are over 30 different types of staphylococci and eight sub-species in the genus Staphylococcus that can infect humans and animals (Cucarella et al. 2004),   most infections are caused by Staphylococcus aureus( Kuroda et al. 2001). 

Staphylococcus aureus is a common disease in both domestic and wild rabbits (Vancraeynest et al. 2007). Moreover, staphylococcal infections lead to substantial economic losses in the livestock industry worldwide (Espinosa et al. 2020 and Mork et al. 2005).

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common causes of infections in people worldwide. It also a versatile opportunistic pathogen affects rabbits of different ages, resulting in various pathologies including dermal lesions, suppurative dermatitis, multisystemic abscessation. pododermatitis, mastitis and pneumonia (Viana et al. 2007; Vancraeynest et al. 2004), in Additionally meteritis can lead to poor production, infertility and death (Shirtliff and Mader. 1999) .

Rabbits can be infected by two types of S. aureus strains: high- and low-virulence strains, Severe outbreaks of the disease in young rabbits are attributed to specific high virulence (HV) S. aureus strains (Hermans et al. 2000, The main manifestations are subcutaneous abscesses, mastitis, pododermatitis and septicaemia.  Severe economic losses have been reported in the USA (Hagen. 1963), Italy, Belgium and France (Okerman et al. 1984) and England (Holliman and Girvan. 1986).

Staphylococcus is a dangerous pathogen that causes a localized suppurative inflammation or a fatal generalized septicemia, The virulence of S. aureus as a pathogen stems from the fact that S. aureus strains possess virulence factors, including the production of biofilms, Adherence may be mediated by a variety of adhesions, such as the autolysin/adhesins Atl and Aaa and secreted toxins (Kreikemeyer et al. 2002; Hagar et al. 2003).

 Staphylococcus aureus is a major pathogen of increasing importance due to the propagation of antibiotic resistance strains such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (Yu et al. 2015 and Nemet et al. 2020).

Staphylococcus aureus poses a hazard to human health as it causes a number of diseases including abscesses as endocarditis, osteomyelitis, pneumonia, and sepsis, so is a frequent cause of serious and life-threatening infections, They are therefore of great public concern (Higgins et al. 2006 and Li et al. 2010).

Therefore, the present study is aims to evaluate the prevalence of Staph aureus strains from a rabbit farm in Damietta governorate, and to detect some virulent genes (blaZ, coa, mecA, tetK and nuc virulent gene), test the susceptibility of the isolated strains to various antimicrobials in vitro and examine their pathogenicity in weaned rabbits.

Materials and Methods                                                         

Samples collection

Samples were taken from 15 rabbit farms in Damietta governorate, Egypt during the period from January to October, 2022. A total of 426 samples were collected including 350 rabbits (98 swabs from apparently healthy rabbit, 257 samples from diseased rabbit and 71 samples from dead rabbits (Table 1). The samples were taken from the skin and infections using sterile cotton swabs. Milk sample were aseptically collected in a sterile tube. lungs or uteruses were taken from Rabbits with genital tract or lung infections were euthanized at laboratories and necropsied under aseptic condi­tions in laboratories. Lung samples were also taken from the dead rabbits with severe respiratory disease. Samples taken at farms were collected in sterile plastic containers, kept in ice box and transported as soon as possible to the laboratory.

Isolation and identification of Staphylococcus aureus isolates

Each sample was mixed with sterile phosphate buffer saline and homogenized to create 50% suspension. A 100 µl of suspension was inoculated on sheep blood agar plate for cultivation at 37 °C for 24 h. Presumptive Staph. aureus isolates were then sub-cultured mannitol salt agar plates. The suspected S. aureus colony was initially identified through colony morphology and gram staining and biochemical testing [catalase, coagulase and sugar fermentation (glucose, sucrose, lactose and mannotol)]. Five colonies typical and atypical were selected from each plate and inoculated into 5ml Brain Heart Infusion broth. The tubes were incubated at 37oC for 24 hours. From which 0.1 ml was transferred to tubes containing 0.3 ml of sterile citrated rabbit plasma. Inoculated tubes were incubated at 37 o C and examined for clot formation after 4 hours (Tchamba et al. 2019. Isolation of Staph. aureus isolates were conducted according to Jarraud et al. 2002.

Molecular detection of Staphylococcus aureus virulent genes     

- DNA extraction and PCR

DNA extraction from samples was performed using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany, GmbH) with modifications from the manufacturer’s recommendations. Briefly, 200 µl of the sample suspension was incubated with 20 µl of proteinase K and 200 µl of lysis buffer at 56OC for 10 min. After incubation, 200 µl of 100% ethanol was added to the lysate. The sample was then washed and centrifuged following the manufacturer’s instructions. Nucleic acid was eluted with 100 µl of elution buffer provided in the kit.                                                            

Oligonucleotide Primer. Primers used were supplied from Metabion (Germany) are listed in table (1).

PCR amplification.

Uniplex PCR. Primers were utilized in a 25- µl reaction containing 12.5 µl of EmeraldAmp Max PCR Master Mix (Takara, Japan), 1 µl of each primer of 20 pmol with concentration, 5.5 µl of water, and 5 µl of DNA template. The reaction was carried in an Applied biosystem 2720 thermal cycler.                                                       

Analysis of the PCR Products.

The products of PCR were separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel (Applichem, Germany, GmbH) in 1x TBE buffer at room temperature using gradients of 5V/cm. For gel analysis, 20 µl of the uniplex products and 30 µl of the multiplex products were loaded in each gel slot. Gelpilot 100 bp plus Ladder (Qiagen, Germany, GmbH) was used to determine the fragment sizes. The gel was photographed by a gel documentation system (Alpha Innotech, Biometra) and the data was analyzed through computer software. The positive DNA samples for blaZ, coa mecA, tetK and nuc gene were obtained from reference laboratory for veterinary quality control on poultry production. (Animal Health Research Institute of Cairo, Egypt). Distilled water was used as negative control.

In vitro-antibiotic susceptibility test of Staph. aureus

The pre-incubated 24 hours cultures of S. aureus were diluted in sterile buffer peptone water and matched with the 0.5 MacFarlane turbidity standards to get 1 ×10 cfu/ml as total count. Culture with 0.5 McFarland density were distributed onto the Müller-Hinton agar (Merck, Germany). The antibiotic discs were distributed on the agar surfaces, and the zones of inhibition were measured after 24 hr (CLSI protocol, Cockerill, 2012).

Pathogenicity test of Staphylococcus aureus in rabbits.

The experiment was done according to the National Regulations on Animal Welfare and Institutional Animal Ethical Committee (IAEC). A total of 65, five rabbits were subjected for bacteriological examination to confirm absence of Staphylococcus aureus. Rabbits were reared in thoroughly cleaned and disinfected houses. Rabbits were kept for a week under observation for adaptation and to ensure the absence of any clinical signs, mortalities. Rabbits were divided into 3 equal groups at 38 days old, each containing 20 rabbits. Rabbits were challenged at 38 day old, rabbits in group (1) were challenged with1 ml subcutaneously of bacterial suspension containing 1 × 108 cfu/ml of viable virulent S. aureus (Reinoso et al. 2002), while rabbits of group (2) were challenged in the nose with1 ml of a bacterial suspension containing 1 × 108 cfu/ml of viable virulent S. aureus (Kildow et al. 2012). Rabbits in group (3) were kept as blank control negative non challenged group, those in group (3) were inoculated with sterile phosphate buffer saline. All rabbits were kept under observation for 3 weeks to detect clinical signs, mortalities and post-mortem lesions. Samples were collected from dead rabbits for re-isolation of S. aureus. At the end of the study, samples including the liver, lung, spleen and heart were collected from sacrificed rabbits for gross lesions, re-isolation of Staph. aureus.

Histopathological examination:

          Tissue specimens from lung, skin, liver and heart were collected and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 72 hrs. Samples were processed in serial grades of ethanols, cleared in Xylene, then infiltrated and embedded into Paraplast tissue embedding media.5μn thick serial tissue sections were cut by rotatory microtome for demonstration of different samples and mounted on glass slides. Tissue sections were stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin as a standard staining method for blinded light microscopic examination using Full HD microscopic imaging system (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Germany). All standard procedures and protocols for samples fixation and staining according to Culling, C.F.A. 2013.

 

Table (1): Primers sequences, target genes, amplicon sizes and cycling conditions.

Target gene

Primers sequences

Amplified segment (bp)

Primary

denaturation

Amplification (35 cycles)

Final extension

Reference

Secondary denaturation

Annealing

Extension

S. aureus 23S rRNA

ACGGAGTTACAAAGGACGAC

1250 bp

94˚C

5 min.

94˚C

30 sec.

55˚C

1 min

72˚C

1.2 min.

72˚C

12 min.

 

Bhati et al., 2016

AGCTCAGCCTTAACGAGTAC

TCTGCAGTTGCTTCACTTCGC

MecA

GTA GAA ATG ACT GAA CGT CCG ATA A

310 bp

94˚C

5 min.

94˚C

30 sec.

50˚C

30 sec.

72˚C

 30 sec.

72˚C

7 min.

McClure et al., 2006

CCA ATT CCA CAT TGT TTC GGT CTA A

Coa

ATA GAG ATG CTG GTA CAG G

 

Four different types of bands may be detected

350 bp

430 bp

570 bp

630 bp

94˚C

5 min.

94˚C

30 sec.

55˚C

40 sec.

72˚C

 45 sec.

72˚C

10 min.

Iyer and Kumosani, 2011

 

GCT TCC GAT TGT TCG ATG C

blaZ

TACAACTGTAATATCGGAGGG

833 bp

94˚C

5 min.

94˚C

30 sec.

50˚C

40 sec.

72˚C

 50 sec.

72˚C

10 min.

 Bagcigil et al. 2012

CATTACACTCTTGGCGGTTTC

nuc

ATATGTATGGCAATCGTTTCAAT

395 bp

94˚C

5 min.

94˚C

30 sec.

55˚C

40 sec.

72˚C

 40 sec.

72˚C

10 min.

Gao et al., 2011

GTAAATGCACTTGCTTCAGGAC

tetK

GTAGCGACAATAGGTAATAGT

360 bp

94˚C

5 min.

94˚C

30 sec.

54˚C

40 sec.

72˚C

 40 sec.

72˚C

10 min.

Duran et al., 2012

GTAGTGACAATAAACCTCCTA

 

 

Results

Based on cultural, morphological and biochemical characteristics of the isolates, a total of 20.4%, 30.4% and 31% Staph. aureus isolates were recovered from 98 apparently healthy rabbit, 257 diseased rabbit samples and 71 dead rabbit, respectively, We recovered isolates from different clinical back­grounds: 37 from respiratory infections, 22 from skin infections, 5 from mastitis and 16 from genital tract infec­tions (Table 2).

Morphologically, Staph. aureus is usually beta hemolytic as it causes lyses of red blood cells on blood agar plates (hemolytic staphylococci), Staphylococci are able to tolerate the high salt concentration found in Mannitol Salt agar and thus grow readily. If mannitol is fermented, the acid produced turns the phenol red pH indicator from red (alkaline) to yellow (acid). Microscopically, the organism is Gram-positive round shape and it is found as either single cells, in pairs, or more frequently, in clusters that resemble a bunch of grapes. Biochemically, it is positive oxidase, catalase, citrate, coagluase, methyl red, voges Proskauer, gelatin hydrolysis, urea hydrolysis and negative for indole, oxidase and  protease activity on milk agar medium, lipase production on egg yolk agar medium (HiMedia, Mumbai), It shows sugar fermentation for Fructose, Galactose, Glucose, Lactose, Maltose, Mannitol, Mannose, ribose and sucrose, but not xylose, salicin, raffinose, cellobiose, arabinose.

The bacterial isolates which were found to be Staphylococcus aureus  based on specific phenotypic features were further confirmed through PCR using specific primer pairs of 23S rRNA (Figures 1). These primers amplify 1250 bp region of 23S rRNA gene fragment of Staphylococcus aureus, which is highly conserved at species level. PCR programming was began with an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1.2 min, ending with a final extension step at 72°C for 12 min (Table 1& Figure 1).

The molecular detection of virulent genes of Staphylococcus aureus showed the presence of coa, mecA, tetK and nuc genes in all strains and  blaZ in almost strains (Figures 2 and 3).

 

The 23S rRNA, mecA, blaZ, tetK, and virulence genes encoding thermonuclease (nuc), coa genes were screened by PCR. The primers for 23S rRNA, mecA, coa,   blaZ, nuc and tetK were reported previously (Table 1).

 

In 60 Staphylococcus aureus strains, in the vitro sensitivity test revealed susceptibility to streptomycine (70%) and penicillin, gentamycin   (63.3%) in addition to doxycy-cline (60%). resistance was detected to ciprofloxacin and Amoxicillin (75%), while, high degree of Resistance to Trimethoprim\Sulphathoxazol (100%), Cefotaxime colstine sulphate and Cephradin was 83.3% (Table 5 and Figure 4).

 

 

 

 

Clinical signs of Staphylococcus aureus challenged rabbit were off food, depression, off food, ruffled fur, disinclination to move, respiratory signs, rhinitis and sinusitis. Nasal discharge and mucopurulent conjunctivitis are sometimes present. Pus from nose and the exudate adheres to the fur around the nares leading to bouts of sneezing. Abscesses can be palpated in subcutaneous tissue and  at the site of inoculation. The observation of  body  weight  along  the  period  of  the  study  which  showed    a  significant  decrease (P<0.05). Post-mortem examination of the dead and surviving rabbits revealed septicemia, peticheal hemorrhage throughout the intestine, sever congestion of the liver, spleen and kidneys, intestine and lung. Pneumonia or abscesses in the lungs or heart. Mortalities began in rabbits of group (2) were challenged in the nose 48hr post challenge (PC) with mortality rate of (13/20, 65%), while rabbits of group (1) that were challenged subcutaneously appeared at 73 hr PC with mortality rate of (7/20, 35%). No clinical signs or mortalities was recorded on phosphate buffer saline inoculated rabbits.

The histopathological lesions of liver of dead and sacrificed rabbit that were challenged at 38 days old are represented in plate (1).The liver of the normal control rabbit demonstrated normal morphological structures of rabbit liver parenchyma with many apparent intact well organized hepatocytes with intact subcellular details (arrow), intact hepatic vasculatures (star) as well as hepatic sinusoids were shown (fig. A). The liver of rabbist that were challenged intranasally showed apparent intact hepatic parenchyma with abundant records of intact well- organized hepatocytes (blue arrow), sporadic focal records of peri portal inflammatory cells infiltrates (red arrow) ( fig. B).  The liver of   rabbits that were challenged subcutaneously showed the same records as intranasal samples (fig. C,D).

The histopathological lesions of the pulmonary tissue in the dead and sacrificed rabbit that challenged at 38 days old are represented in plate (2). Normal control pulmonary tissue samples showed apparent intact histological features of pulmonary parenchyma with almost apparent intact alveolar epithelium with thin inter alveolar septa (arrow) showing minimal inflammatory cells infiltrates and normal vasculatures. Intact bronchiolar structures with few peribronchiolar inflammatory cells infiltrates (red arrow) were also observed (fig. A). pulmonary tissue samples of rabbits that challenged subcutaneously showed marked diffuse hemorrhagic pneumonia (blue star) with significant thickening of interalveolar walls and abundant inflammatory cells infiltrates (blue arrow) as well as marked congested and dilated pulmonary vasculature( fig. B). The pulmonary tissue samples of rabbit that challenged intranasal showed moderate focal records of hemorrhagic pneumonia with intraluminal bloody exudates, with sever congested blood vessels (black star), peribronchiolar inflammatory cells infiltrates (red arrow) and intra bronchiolar desquamated epithelial cells mixed with bloody exudates (blue star) (fig. C,D).

The histopathological lesions of the skin /muscle samples  of dead and sacrificed rabbits that were challenged at 38 days old are collected in plate (3). Normal control samples showed apparent intact, normal and organized histological features of skin layers including thin epidermal layer and dermal layers with normal organized collagen fibers, as well as hair follicles with minimal inflammatory cells infiltrates (fig. A, B). samples of rabbits that challenged subcutaneously demonstrated sever mixed inflammatory cells infiltrates in deep dermal and subcutaneous tissues with abundant necrotic tissue depress (star) and a few records of intact subcutaneous and deeper muscular tissue with significant fibroblastic activity. Intact epidermal layers (fig. C,D).

Table (2): The incidence of Staphylococcus aureus from surveyed rabbit’s farms in Damietta governorate, Egypt

Dead rabbit

Diseased rabbit

Apparently healthy rabbit

Type of samples

% positive

Number of positive

Number of samples

% positive

Number of positive

Number of samples

% positive

Number of positive

Number of samples

30

12

40

31.3

25

80

0

0

20

Lung

33,3

3

9

28

14

50

25

5

20

Skin swaps

-

-

-

30.8

4

13

14.3

1

7

Milk

30

3

10

26.7

8

30

25

5

20

Uterus

33.3

4

12

32.1

27

84

29

9

31

Nasal swaps

31

22

71

30.4

78

257

20.4

20

98

Total

 

Table (3): Results of antibiogram test against Staph aureus.

 

 

Antibiotic Disc (Code)

 

 

Disc content/ µg

Antimicrobial efficacy (%) against 60 strain of Staph aureus

Susceptible

IntermediateSusceptibility

Resistant

Amoxicillin (AX)

25

0

15 (25%)

45 (75%)

Cefotaxime (CTX)

30

0

0

60 (100%)

Cephradin (CE)

30

0

0

60 (100%)

Ciprofloxacin (CIP)

5

1 (1.7%)

14 (23.3%)

45 (75%)

Gentamycin (CN)

10

38 (63.3%)

2 (3.3%)

20 (33.3%)

Colistinsulphate (CT)

10

0

10 (16.7%)

50 (83.3 %)

Streptomycin (S)

10

42 (70%)

8 (13.3%)

10 (16.7%)

Doxycycline (Do)

30

36 (60%)

3 (5%)

21 (35%)

 Trimethoprim /ٍٍٍSulphathoxazole (SXT)

 

0

7 (21.2%)

60 (100%)

Penicillin G (P)

10

38 (63.3%)

7 (11.7%)

15 (25%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure (1): PCR amplification using Staph aureus 23S rRNA), Pos= positive control, L= ladder, lines 1-4, 7-14 = clinical isolates of Staph aureus, lines 5-6, 15-16 = negative isolates of Staph aureus, Neg= negative control

 

 

Figure (2): PCR amplification using Staph aureus genus-specific primers (tetK, nuc, mecA genes) Pos= positive control, L= ladder, lines 1-5 = clinical isolates of Staph aureus tetk genus, lines 1-5 = clinical isolates of Staph aureus nuc genus, lines 1-5 = clinical isolates of Staph aureus mecA genus, Neg= negative control

 

 

 

Figure (2): PCR amplification using Staph aureus genus-specific primers (coa and blaZ genes), Pos= positive control, L= ladder, lines 1-5 = clinical isolates of Staph aureus coa genus, 1,3,5= clinical isolates of Staph aureus blaZ genus, lines 2,4 (negative blaZ),  Neg= negative control

 

 

Figure (4): Results of antibiogram test against Staphylococcus aureus

 

 

 

Plate (1): Showing the histopathological lesions in liver organs of 38 day old rabbit.

 

 

Plate (2): Showing the histopathological lesions in pulmonary tissue samples of 38 day old rabbit..

 

 

 

Plate (3): Showing the histopathological lesions in skin /muscle samples of 38 day old rabbit.

 

 

Discussion

Staphylococcus aureus remains one of the most prominent human bacterial pathogens worldwide (Davis et al. 2014 and Sato et al. 2017), In addition, S.aureus is able to cause a variety of infections in numerous other host species (Schaumburg et al. 2013and  Brady et al. 2018). Staphylococcus aureus is the cause of serious infections in rabbits, including a highly fatal disease of neonatal rabbits, pododermatitis, subcutaneous abscesses in rabbits of all ages, infertility and mastitis in lactating does, causing significant economic losses (Hermans et al. 2003 and Vancraeynest et al. 2006). The severe respiratory disease in rabbits is often caused by Bordetella bronchiseptica, Pasteurella multocida, Staphylococcus species, Pseudomonas species, and other bacteria as well as rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (Rougier et al. 2006 and Fisher and Graham. 2023).

Preliminary identification tests including; cultural, microscopic and biochemical identifications of Staphylococcus aureus, showed that the organism was recovered from 20 (20.4%) out of 98 apparently healthy rabbit, 78 (30.4%) out of 257 diseased rabbit and from 22 (31%) out of 71 dead rabbits. The incidence of Staphylococcus aureus from surveyed rabbit’s farms in Damietta governorate, Egypt was detected as follow 5 (25%) out of 20 skin swaps from from apparently healthy rabbits, 1(14.3%) out of 7 milk samples from apparently healthy rabbit, 5 (25%) out of 20 uterus sample from apparently healthy rabbits, 9 (29%) out of 31 nasal swabs from apparently healthy rabbits, 25(31.3%) out of 80 lung samples from diseased rabbits, 14 (28%) out of 50 skin swaps from diseased rabbit, 4 (30.8%) out of 13 milk samples from diseased rabbits, 8 (26.7%) out of 30 uterus sample from diseased rabbits, 27 (32.1%) out of 84 nasal swaps from diseased rabbits and 12 (30%) out of 40 lung samples from dead rabbits, 3 (33.3%) out of 9 skin swabs from dead rabbit, 3 (30%) out of 10 uterus samplse from dead rabbits,4 (33.3%) out of 12 nasal swaps from dead rabbits. Similar findings were observed by Hermans et al. 1999 who reported that healthy rabbits may be carriers of pathogenic strains,  spreading through direct contact or aerosol, and that it is important in maintaining infection within the herd with no previous history of the disease. This is in agreement with Ali. 1991 who found staphylococcus aurues in percentages of 23.1% in Egypt. Lower isolation percentages were recorded by Abd-EL-Motelib and Salem. 1991 who recovered six strains of coagulase positive B. hemolytic s. aurues from infecting lactating does and their suckling rabbits. However, higher rates of s. aurues recovery were detected by Ajuwape and Aregbesola .2002) who found s. aurues in percentages of100% from the upper respiratory tract of health rabbits. In addation to Hagen. 1963 who reported serious economic losses in the USA, in England (Holliman and Girvan. 1986) and in Italy, France and Belgium (Okerman et al. 1984). The infection of high-virulence strains results in a high mortality rate in young rabbits and an epidemic spread among a rabbit flock, causing significant economic losses (Hermans et al. 2003). S. aurues affect rabbits of different ages causing different pathologies including mastitis, suppurative dermatitis and abscessation (Vancraeynest et al. 2004; Vancraeynest et al. 2006a and Segura et al. 2007), a severe respiratory disease ( Vancraeynest et al. 2006 and Denayer et al. 2017). the infection of S. aureus results in a broad variety of diseases including bacteraemia, sepsis, mastitis and fibrinous pneumonia or abscesses in the lungs or heart have been documented in scientific literature(Hermans et al. 2003; Schmidt et al. 2017 and Hecker et al. 2018).

In our search of scientific literature, we discovered that Staphylococcus aureus was confirmed through PCR analysis using 32S rRNA primers. S. aureus Strains were found to have 5 or 6 23S rRNA operons (Wada et al. 1993, Pillai et al. 2002 and Katsunori et al. 2023). Brakstad et al. 1992 who found that identifying the use of the nuc gene for identification of Staphylococcus aureus strains. An extracellular thermostable  nuclease (TNase) which is a protein with a molecular mass of 17,000 Da (Tucker et al. 1978). TNase cuts both DNA and RNA and is produced by Staphylococcus aureus strains (Thiele. 1990). PCR amplification of the nuc gene is used in many laboratories for the identification of S. aureus isolates (Wilson et al. 1991 and Murray et al. 2003).Nucleases are known to potentially decrease the antibacterial activity of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which consist of DNA released from lysed neutrophils (Brinkmann et al. 2012). The presence of nuc and mecA genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from rabbits with dermatological pathologies indicates potential zoonotic behavior (Silva et al. 2020). The nuc gene is considered a virulence factor contributing significantly to the pathogenicity of virulent S. aureus and it   must be considered in preventive strategies to prevent the transmission of antimicrobial resistance-gene to the human population (Sahebnasagh et al. 2014). There is increasing evidence of S. aureus resistance  to methicillin including [methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA)]   and other antimicrobials of betalactamase group, this resistance is related to the mecA (methicillin resistance)gene (Baba 2002, Boucher and Corey 2008  ). Hartman et al. 1984 and Ubukata et al. 1989 who  reported that the mecA encodes the protein PBP2A (penicillin-binding protein 2A), a transpeptidase that assists in the formation the bacterial cell wall. This complicated the treatment of insidious infections such as those occurring in rabbits with severe abscesses (Harcourt-Brown 2001) and severe respiratory disease in rabbits (Wang J et al. 2019). Necrotizing pneumonia is frequently associated with community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) (Harrison 2014 and Sicot et al. 2013), hospital-acquired(HA)  infections (Rajaduraipandiet al. 2006) or or other health care settings (Tyagi et al. 2008 and Sato et al. 2017 ). Pathogenic staphylococci are commonly identified by their ability to produce coagulase ,which is a virulence factor of S. aureus (Kloos and Bannerman,1994), coagulase converts soluble fibrinogen in plasma to insoluble fibrin (Thomer et al. 2013), which subsequently coats the bacterial cells and helps resist phagocytic engulfment, In addition to, Fibrin deposition is a critical process to abscess formation (Cheng et al. 2010 and Kobayashi et al. 2015). The majority of isolates of Staphylococcus aureus have the blaZ gene, which encoded penicillin resistance in (Abdellatif et al. 2018). The gene blaZ, along with its transcription repressor gene blaI, and a signal transducer-sensor protein, encoded by blaR1 are clustered together to control the expression of blaZ gene (Firth and  Skurray. 2000). Phylogenetic analysis reveals for blaZ three evolutionary lines originating from plasmids, one from chromosome, and one intermediate group (Schwendener et al. 2019). Turner et al. 2019 reported the acquisition of the β-lactamase encoding gene blaZ as amechanism of resistance. High prevalences of penicillin-resistance have been reported for example in Korea 78.8% (Nam et al. 2011),  in Estonia 61.4% (Hendriksen et al. 2008) and England 46% (Kalmus et al. 2011). Low prevalence of penicillin-resistant S. aureus have been reported in Sweden 7.1% and Norway 11.4% (Hendriksen et al. 2008 and Persson et al. 2011). TET resistance genes (tetL, tetK, tetM, tetO) are four major genes associated with tetracycline resistance among Gram positive bacteria (Lina et al. 1999). ]. The tetK gene, which encodes a tetracycline efflux pump from Staphylococcus aureus (Truong-Bolduc et al. 2022), was found to be present in most of the TET-resistant isolates a long with the tetM, gene indicating their responsiblity for resistance to TET genes (Lim et al. 2012, Emaneini  et al. 2013 and Xuehan et al. 2019). The presence of these genes in rabbit isolates explains the presence of penicillin resistance. Antimicrobial resistance was common, isolates possessed a number of virulence factors consistent with the ability to cause severe abscesses and an understanding of disease pathogenesis in rabbits. Therefore, the indiscriminate use of antimicrobial has generated a selective pressure for the appearance of resistant strains, the efficiency of the treatment is compromising (Hou et al. 2023).

In vitro sensitivity test conducted on 60 Staphylococcus aureus strains, the revealed Susceptibility was detected to streptomycine (70%) and penicillin, gentamycin   (63.3%) and doxycycline (60%). resistance was observed against ciprofloxacin and Amoxicillin (75%). As well as Trimethoprim /Sulphathoxazol, Cefotaxime, Cephradin (100%) and Colstine sulphate was 83.3%.These results a long with similar findings reported by María et al. 2020 who noted a high percentage of resistance Staphylococcus species isolates to Amoxicillin/Clavulanate, Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole, Ciprofloxacin, Enrofloxacin and Vancomycin. Furthermore, Jamali et al. 2015 reported that S. aureus resistance to gentamicin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline, but a low incidence of resistance to erythromycin, kankanamycin, streptomycin, penicillin G, and oxacillin. Staphy aureus strains were determined to be resistance to methicillin. Studies conducted by (Rubinstein et al. 2008, Baba  et al. 2002, Davis et al. 2014, Haenni et al. 2017 and Moreno et al. 2018).  Additionally, other studies reported resistance of this genus to cephalexin (Papichet al. 2018), quinolones (Kang et al. 2014), Cloxacillin (Abdel-Hafeez. 2002) and lincosamides (Larsen et al. 2015). contradictory to the finding reported by Wang et al. 2019 the isolate of staph aurues was resistant to ampicillin and streptomycin and susceptible to ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, florfenicol, levofloxacin doxycycline, enrofloxacin and neomycin.

The observation of body weight during the study period showed a significant  decrease (P<0.05) which was due to systemic reaction against the bacterial infection and its toxins affecting interal organs. This was confirmed by positive isolation of bacteria and the effect of bacterial toxin on the digestive system impacting the general health condition and absorption of food from intestine (Emsile and Nade.1983). Meanwhile, the body temperature    showed  significant    increase if compared  with  control  group which may be attributed to  the Neutrophiles ability  to produce  endogenous  pyrogenes that  is responsible for  increasing the body temperature or due to the effect of bacteria(causing lesions) on hypothalamus that part  of the brain  responsible  for  regulating  body  temperature  resulting in an  increase in body temperature (Kobayashi et al. 2015). The  clinical  sings  that  experimental  animals  show  (chock  &  cough , difficulty in breathing)  are considered as normal reaction to the irritant injected material .however, the death of animals occur due to the lethal toxin effect of  Staphylococcus aureus which  kilsl with in  2-24  h (Merchant and  Parker.1967).On the other hand, some of Staphylococcus aureus challenged rabbits showed off food, depression, ruffled fur, disinclination to move, respiratory signs, rhinitis and sinusitis are the most common forms, Nasal discharge and mucopurulent conjunctivitis sometimes occur. Then, pus from nose, the exudate adheres to the fur around the nares and bouts of sneezing may occur. Abscesses are able to be palpated in subcutaneous tissue and in site of inoculation. The post-mortem examination of the dead and survived rabbits revealed septicemia, peticheal hemorrhage throughout the intestine, sever congestion of the liver, spleen and kidneys, intestine blood vessels and lung. pneumonia or abscesses may be present in the lungs or heart. However, congestion of some organs was due to the harmful effect of bacterial toxins on endothelial cells of blood vessels which induce disturbance in the permeability of these blood vessels(Landrum et al. 2012 and Edelweijin et al. 1976). The  typical  inflammatory  response  to Staphylococcus aureus infection was characterized by accumulation of inflammatory cells at different part of the organ including  (neutrophils,  macrophage  and  lymphocytes)  which  lead  to  abscess formation or suppurative  inflammation at  different  organs  such  as  trachea,    lung,  liver and  kidney (Adlam et al. 1976 and Lowy. 1998) with degenerative changes(Bekeredjian-Ding. 2017).skin lesions developed due to the effect of staphylococcus aureus on T-regulatory cell which lose their effect in preventing exacerbation of inflammatory response(Bekeredjian-Ding. 2017 and LaborelPréneron. 2015). Staphylococcus aureus bacteria were isolated throughout the entire period  of  experiment from internal organs and blood due to the distribution of bacteria via the blood stream (bacteremia) ( Emsile and Nade.1983 and DeMaria and Frank.1978)

 Mortalities began in rabbits of group (2) which were challenged in the nose 48hr post challenge (PC) with mortality rate of (13/20, 65%), While rabbits of group (1) which were challenged subcutaneously appeared 73 hr PC with mortality rate of (7/20, 35%). No clinical signs or mortalities were recorded in phosphate buffer saline inoculated rabbits. Serious economic losses have however been reported in the USA (Hagen. 1963), England (Holliman and Girvan. 1986), Italy, France and Belgium (Okerman et al. 1984) and in the livestock industry worldwide (Mork et al. 2005). The pathogenicity test of 5 week old weaned rabbits showed that Staph aureus was highly pathogenic, inducing mortality rates of 65 and 35%, respectively. Generally, the pathogenic capacity of Staphy aureus is clearly dependent on a combination of virulence factors (Edwards et al. 2010).  In rabbits, isolated Staph aureus strains carried a panel of virulence genes (Bae et al. 2009 and Viana et al. 2015). The infection of S. aureus results in a broad variety of diseases including skin and soft tissue infection, which can be complicated and life-threatening  (Robinson et al. 2004, Segura et al. 2007 and Bae et al. 2009). Furthermore, bacteraemia, mastitis and pneumonia (Hermans et al. 2003; Sicot et al. 2013,  Schmidt et al. 2017 and Hecker et al. 2018).

 

In the last of study, we found that injectable antimicrobials were often used for staphylococcus control, in addition to the hygiene practices such as, the duo system, moving to clean disinfected barns for parturition, culling diseased does and avoiding fostere kits. A single batch is better, or the duo system, which involve moving females near parity to a clean and disinfected room, therefore, the number of batches per maternity barn also influences the occurrence of disease. Biosecurity practices, husbandry, environment and changes in hosts are highlighted to provide health and welfare benefits for breeding rabbits.

Conclusion

Accurate, rapid and molecular methods of diagnosis must be applied. There are resistance to the common antibiotics used for prevention and control Staph aureus in rabbits, so it is necessary to carry out in vitro sensitivity test of rabbits Staph. aureus to different antimicrobial agents. The detection of virulent genes of the isolated Staph. aureus strains with overlapping functions and reproduction of antibiotic resistance gene in the Egyptian field are very important, as well as in vivo pathogenicity studies.

Abd-El-Hafeez M M. 2002. Invitro antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance pattern of staphylococcus Spp. Recovered from bovine mastitis. In the Arab World, 26-28. Assiut Univ. Center for Enviromental studies, Egypt.
Abdellatif H A, Samy A K and Abdelhalim H. 2018. Molecular Study on Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotic with Special Reference to Plasmid Curing. Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 58 (1): 109-119.
Adlam C,Thorley C M,Ward P,Collins M,Lucken R N and Knight P A.1976. Natural and experimental Staphylococcal mastitis in rabbits.J.Comp.path.86:581-593.
Agnoletti F, Elena M ,Cosetta B, Luca B, Giacomo B, Roberto R, Giovanna M, Paola C, Elena T and Ilenia D. 2014. First reporting of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ST398 in an industrial rabbit holding and in farm-related people. Veterinary Microbiology, 170, 172–177.
 Baba T, Takeuchi F and Kurado M. 2002. Genome and virulence determinants of high virulence community-acquired MRSA. Lancet. 359: 1819–1827.
 Bae I G, Tonthat GT, Stryjewski M E, Rude T H, Reilly L F, Barriere S L, Genter F C, Corey G R and Fowler V G. 2009. Presence of genes encoding the panton-valentine leukocidin exotoxin is not the primary determinant of outcome in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: results of a multinational trial. J Clin Microbiol, 47: 3952-3957.
Bekeredjian-Ding 2017. Deciphering the significance of the T-cell response to Staphylococcus aureus Future Microbiol, 12 , pp. 1023-1026.
Boucher, H.W. and Corey, G.R. (2008): Epidemiology of methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus, Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 46, supplement 5, pp. S344–S349.
Brakstad O G, Aasbakk K  and Maeland J A. 1992. Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc gene, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 30 (7): 1654–1660.
Brinkmann V and Zychlinsky A. 2012. Neutrophil extracellular traps: is immunity the second function of chromatin? J Cell Biol. 198:773–783.
Cheng A G, McAdow M, Kim H K, Bae T, Missiakas D M and Schneewind O. 2010. Contribution of coagulases towards Staphylococcus aureus disease and protective immunity. PLoS Pathog.; 6:e1001036.
CLSI/NCCLS (Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute/ National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards). 2001. Development of in vitro susceptibility testing criteria and quality control parameters; approved guideline, 2nd edn. CLSI/NCCLS Document M23-A2, CLSI/NCCLS, Wayne, PA.
Cockerill F R. 2012. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Second Informational Supplement. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
Culling C F A. 2013. Handbook of Histopathological and Histochemical Techniques, Ed. 3, Butterworths, London, UK. 2013.
Davis J A, Jackson C R, Fedorka-Cray P J, Barrett J B, Brousse J H, Gustafson J and Kucher M. 2014. Carriage of methicillin-resistant staphylococci by healthy companion animals in the US. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 59: 1–8.
DeMaria and Frank  A  Kapral 1978. Pulmonary  Infection  of  Mice with Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. Jul; 21(1): 114–123.
Dicicco M, Neethirajan S, Singh A and Weese J S. 2012.  Efficacy of clarithromycin on biofilm formation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. BMC Vet Res. 8:225.
Duim B, Verstappen K, Kalupahana R S, Ranathunga L, Fluit A C and Wagenaar J A 2018. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius amongdogs in the description of novel SCCmec variants. Veterinary Microbiology, 213:136–41.
Edelweijin Z, Jeljaszewicz J, Wadstron T, Mollby R and  Pulverer G.  1976. Influance  of Staphylococcus  aureus  alpha-hemolysin  on  cortical  optical  evoked  potentiols  in "Staphylococci  &Staphylococcal  Disease".J  .Jeljaszewicz,ed.PP.747-754,Karger,Basle.
Edwards A M, Potts J R, Josefsson E and Massey R C. 2010. Staphylococcus aureus host cell invasion and virulence in sepsis is facilitated by the multiple repeats within FnBPA. PLoS Pathog., 6: e1000964.
Emaneini M, Bigverdi R, Kalantar D, Soroush S, Jabalameli F, Noorazar K B, Asadollahi P and Taherikalani M. 2013. Distribution of genes encoding tetracycline resistance and aminoglycoside modifying enzymes in staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from a burn center. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 16 (2):76–80.
Emsile K R and Nade S. 1983. Acute hematogenous Staphylococcal osteomyelitis.Am.J.Pathol.110:333-345.
Firth N and Skurray R A. 2000. Genetics: Accessory elements and genetic exchange. In: Fischetti VA, Novick RP, Ferretti JJ et al., eds. Gram Positive Pathogens. Washington, DC: ASM Press, 326–38.
Fisher P and Graham J. 2023. Rabbits. In: Carpenter J, Harms C (eds). Carpenter’s Exotic Animal Formulary, 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier, 605-606.
Haenni M, Chatre P, Dupieux-Chabert C, Metayer V, Bes M., Madec J Y, Laurent F 2017.  Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in horses, cats, and dogs over a 5-year period in france. Front. Microbiol. 8: 2493.
Harcourt-Brown F. 2001. Textbook of Rabbit Medicine. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Harrison E M, Weinert L A, Holden M T G, Welch J J, Wilson K and Morgan F E. 2014. A Shared Population of Epidemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus 15 Circulates in Humans and Companion Animals. Mbio. 5 (3).
Hartman B J and Tomasz A. 1984. Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with b-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 158: 513–6.
Hecker M,  Mader U and Volker U. 2018. From the genome sequence via the proteome to cell physiology - pathoproteomics and pathophysiology of Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 308: 545-557.
Hendriksen R S, Mevius D J, Schroeter A, Teale C, Meunier D, Butaye P, Franco A, Utinane A, Amado A, Moreno M, Greko C, Stärk K, Berghold C, Myllyniemi A-L, Wasyl D, Sunde M and Aarestrup F M. 2008. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among bacterial pathogens isolated from cattle in different European countries: 2002–2004. Acta Vet Scand, 2008, 50:28.
Hermans K, Devriese L A and Haesebrouck F 2003. Rabbit staphylococcosis: difficult solutions for serious problems. Vet. Microbiol. 1: 57-64
Holliman A and Girvan G A. 1986. Staphylococcosis in a commercial rabbitry. Vet. Rec. 119: 187.
Jarraud S, Christophe M., Jean TGerard LHélène M, Françoise F, Xavier NJerome E and François V. 2002. Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infection and Immunity 70, 631–641.
Kang M H, Chae M J, Yoon J W, Lee S Y, Yoo J H  and Park H M. 2014. Resistance to fluoroquinolones and methicillin in ophthalmic isolates of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from companion animals. Can Vet J. 55:678–82.
Katsunori S, Mitsumasa S and Hideaki H. 2023. Increased copy number of 23S ribosomal RNA gene with point mutation in MRSA associated with linezolid resistance in a patient treated with long-term linezolid. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 29: 481–484.
Kildow B J, Conradie J P, Robson R L. 2012. Nostrils of healthy volunteers are independent with regard to Staphylococcus aureus carriage. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50:3744–6.
Kloos W E, Bannerman T L. 1994. Update on clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol Rev. 7: 117-140
Kobayashi S D, Malachowa N and DeLeo F R. 2015. Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus abscesses. Am. J. Pathol. 185 (6): 1518–1527.
LaborelPréneron E,  Bianchi P,  Boralevi F,  Lehours P,  Fraysse F, MoricePicard F, Sugai M,  Sato'o Y,  Badiou C,  Lina G,  Schmitt A M,  Redoulès D, Casas C,  Davrinche C. 2015. Effect of the Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis secretomes isolated from the skin microbiota of atopic children on CD4+ T cell activation PLoS One, 10
Landrum  M L,  Neumann  C,  Cook  C,  Chukwuma U,  Ellis  MW,  Hospenthal  DR. 2012. Epidemiology  of Staphylococcus  aureus blood  and  skin  and  soft  tissue infections in the US military health system, 2005–2010. JAMA.;308: 50–9. 
Larsen R, Boysen L, Berg J, Guardabassi L and Damborg P. 2015.  Lincosamide resistance is less frequent in Denmark in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from firsttime canine superficial pyoderma compared with skin isolates from clinical samples with unknown clinical background. Vet Dermatol. 26:e43–4.
Lim K T, Hanifah Y A, Yusof  M and Thong  K L. 2012. ermA, ermC, tetM and tetK are essential for erythromycin and tetracycline resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Indian J Med Microbiol. 30 (2):203–7.
Lina G, Quaglia A, Reverdy M E, Leclercq R, Vandenesch F and Etienne J. 1999. Distribution of genes encoding resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins among staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother.43 (5):1062–6.
Lowy F D. 1998. Staphylococcus aureus Infections. N. Engl .J .Med.;339: 520–532.
Lozano C, Porres-Osante N, Crettaz J, Rojo-Bezares B, Benito D, Olarte I, Zarazaga M,   Sáenz Y and Torres C. 2013.  Changes in genetic lineages, resistance, and virulence in clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Spanish hospital. J Infect Chemother.19 (2):233–42.
María S G, Hernán D C, David A C and Danny C C. 2020. Molecular Detection and Characterization of the mecA and nuc Genes From Staphylococcus Species (S. aureus, S. pseudintermedius, and S. schleiferi) Isolated From Dogs Suffering Superficial Pyoderma and Their Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles. Front. Vet. Sci. 7:376.
 Merchant L A and  Parker R A. 1967. In "Veterinary bacteriology  &virology,7th   ed.PP.120-124.The Iowa state uni.press
Mork T, Tollersrud T, Kvitle B, Jorgensen H J and Waage S. 2005. Genetic diversity of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from ovine intramammary infections in Norway. Vet. Microbiol. 106: 265-273.
Moreno-Grúa E, Pérez-Fuentes S, Muñoz-Silvestre A, Viana D, Fernández-Ros A, Sanz-Tejero C, Corpa J and Selva L. 2018. Characterization of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates obtained from commercial rabbitries located in the Iberian Peninsula. Front. Microbiol. 9: 1812. P. R.Murray, E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. A. Pfaller, and R.H. Yolken, Manual of Clinical Microbiology, American Society for Microbiology,Washington, DC, USA, 8th edition, 2003.
Nam H-M, Lee A-L, Jung M-NK, Jang G-C, Wee S-H, Lim S-K: Antimicrobial susceptibility of staphylococus aureus and characterization of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine mastitis in Korea. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2011, 8:231–23.
Okerman L, Devriese L A, Maertens L, Okerman F and Godard C. 1984. Cutaneous staphylococcosis in rabbits. Vet. Rec., 114: 313-315.
Papich M G and Lindeman C. 2018. Cephalexin susceptibility breakpoint for veterinary isolates: clinical laboratory standards institute revision. J Vet Diagn Invest. 30:113–20.
Persson Y, Nyman A-K J and Grönlund-Andersson U. 2011. Etiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of udder pathogens from cases of subclinical mastitis indairy cows in Sweden. Acta Vet Scand, 53:36.
Pillai S K, Sakoulas G, Wennersten C, Eliopoulos M, Moellering J r and Ferraro M J  2002. Linezolid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: characterization and stability, of resistant phenotype. J Infect Dis.186:1603–7.
Rajaduraipandi K, Mani K R, Panneerselvam K, Mani M,  Bhaskar M and Manikandan P 2006. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a multicentre study, Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, 24( 1): 34–38.
Reinoso E,  Magnano G,  Giraudo J, Calzolari A and  Bogni C. 2002. Bovine and rabbit models for the study of a Staphylococcus aureus avirulent mutant strain, RC122. Can J Vet Res.   66(4): 285–288.
Robinson D A and Enright M C. 2004. Multilocus sequence typing and the evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2: 92-97.
Rubinstein E, Kollef M H and Nathwani D. 2008. Pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis. 46(5):S378 –S385.
Rougier S, Galland D, Boucher S, Boussarie D and VALLÉ M.  2006. Epidemiology and susceptibility of pathogenic bacteria responsible for upper respiratory tract infections in pet rabbits. Veterinary Microbiology, 115 (1-3), 192-198.
Sahebnasagh R, Saderi H  and Owlia P. 2014. The prevalence of resistance to methicillin in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from patients by PCR Method for detection of mecA and nuc genes, Iranian Journal of Public Health, 43(1):  84–92.
Sato T, Usui M, Konishi N, Kai A, Matsui H, Hanaki H and Tamura Y. 2017. Closely related methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from retail meat, cows with mastitis, and humans in Japan. PLoS One, 10: e0187319.
Schaumburg F, Mugisha L, Kappeller P, Fichtel C, Köck R, Köndgen S,  Becker K, Boesch C, Peters G and Leendertz F. 2013. Evaluation of non-invasive biological samples to monitor Staphylococcus aureus colonization in great apes and lemurs. PLoS ONE, 8, e78046.
Schmidt T, Kock M M and Ehlers M M. 2017. Molecular Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis and close human contacts in South African dairy herds: genetic diversity and inter-species host transmission. Front. Microbiol. 8: 511.
Schwendener S and Perreten V. 2022. The bla and mec families of β-lactam resistance genes in the genera Macrococcus, Mammaliicoccus and Staphylococcus: an in-depth analysis with emphasis on  on Macrococcus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 77 (7):1796-1827.
 Segura P, Martínez J, Peris B, Selva L, Viana D, Penadés J and Corpa J M. 2007. Staphylococcal infections in rabbit does on two industrial farms. Vet. Rec. 160: 869-872.
Sicot N, Khanafer N, Meyssonnier V, Dumitrescu O, Tristan A, Bes M, Lina G, Vandenesch F, Vanhems P, Etienne J and Gillet Y. 2013. Methicillin resistance is not a predictor of severity in community acquired Staphylococcus aureus necrotizing pneumonia-results of a prospective observational study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect., 19: E142-148.
Silva V, De Sousa T, Gomez P, Sabenca C, Vieira-Pinto M and Capita R. 2020. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in purulent subcutaneous lesions of farm rabbits. Foods 9(4):439.
Tchamba C, Rao A S, Boyen F, Haesebrouck F, Jean Noel D and Theron L. 2019.  Comparison of quantitative PCR and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry assays for identification of bacteria in milk samples from cows with subclinical mastitis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 127:683–692. 
Thiele D. 1990. The technique of polymerase chain reaction-a new diagnostic tool in microbiology and other scientific fields (review). Zentralbl. Bateriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. 1 Orig. 273:434-454.
Thomer L, Schneewind O and Missiakas D.2013. Multiple ligands of von Willebrand Factor binding protein(vWbp) promote Staphylococcus aureus clot formation in human plasma. J Biol Chem. In Press.
Truong-Bolduc Q C, Wang Y and Hooper D C. 2022. Role of Staphylococcus aureus Tet38 in Transport of Tetracycline and Its Regulation in a Salt Stress Environment. J Bacteriol.  19;204(7): e0014222.
Tucker P W, Hazen E E  and Cotton F A. 1978. Staphylococcal nuclease reviewed: a prototypic study in contemporary enzymology. I. Isolation, physical and enzymatic properties. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 22:67-77.
Turner N A, Batu K S-KStacey A MEmily M E, Pratik P SManuela CThomas L H and Vance G F. 2019. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an overview of basic and clinical research. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 203–218.
Tyagi A,  Kapil A and Singh P 2008. Incidence of methicillin resistant Stahylococcus aureus (MRSA) in pus samples at a Tertiary Care Hospital, AIIMS, New Delhi, Journal, Indian Academy of Clinical Medicine, 9 (1):33–35.
 Ubukata K, Nonoguchi R, Matsuhashi M and Konno M. 1989. Expression and inducibility in Staphylococcus aureus of the mecA gene, which encodes a methicillin-resistant S. aureus-specific penicillin-binding protein. Journal of Bacteriology. 171 (5): 2882–5.
Viana D, Selva L, Penadés M and Corpa J M 2015. Screening of virulence genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from rabbits. World Rabbit Sci., 23: 185-195.
Wada A,  Ohta H,  Kulthanan K and  Hiramatsu K.  1993.  Molecular cloning and mapping of 16S-23S rRNA gene complexes of Staphylococcus aureus, J Bacteriol, 175:7483-7487.
Wang J, Sang L, Chen Y, Sun S, Chen D and Xie X. 2019. Characterisation of staphylococcus aureus strain causing severe respiratory disease in rabbits. World Rabbit Sci. 27: 41-48.
Wilson I G, Cooper J E  and Gilmour A. 1991. Detection of enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus in dried skimmed milk: use of the polymerase chain reaction for amplification and detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes entB and entCI and the thermonuclease gene nuc. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:1793-1798.
Xuehan L, Huang T, Kai X, Chenglin L  and Yirong L.  2019. Molecular characteristics and virulence gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Hainan, China BMC Infectious Diseases, 19 (1): 873