Role of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in rabbits infections

Document Type : Original researches

Abstract

A total of  150  samples were collected from 110 diseased and 40 dead rabbits from private farms including (50 abscess swabs,20 liver samples,20 lung samples,30 infected wound swabs and 30 mastitic milk samples ) for bacteriological and molecular examinations.  S. aureus was isolated from 27 cases with a percentage of 18 %, including 7 isolates resistant to methicillin (MRSA) with a percentage of 4.7 % and 20 isolates were sensitive to methicillin with a percentage of 13.3%.
Sixty rabbits were used as laboratory animal models in an experiment designed to study the pathogenicity of S. aureus. rabbits were monitored daily for development of clinical signs in the form of abscess formation, conjunctivitis, keratitis, arthritis, cough, weight loss or lethargy.
MRSA experimentally injected strain could be recovered and confirmed bacteriologically and molecularly form all infected group rabbits.
All S. aureus strains were positive for amplification of 756 base fragments specific for 16S rRNA of S. aureus using Staph756 F and Staph750 R primers, while 7 MRSA strains showed positive amplification of 450 base pair fragments specific for SCCmec subtype IVa genes using SCCmec 4a1 and SCCmec 4a2 primers.
 Four  Rep-PCR primers were used for estimating of genetic diversity of MRSA isolates ( Rep-1, Rep-2, Rep-12and Rep-18 ). The four Rep-PCR primers produced about 55 fragments, 26 of them consider as monomorphic bands with about 47.5% and other 29 fragments consider as polymorphic bands with about 52.5%.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Role of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in rabbits infections

El-gedawy, A.A. 1 ; Abeer, E. Abd-elghafar2 ; Ghada Allam Abd El-Dayem3,Rasha A.Mohsen2

1 Bacteriology Department, Ahri, Dokki,Giza.ARC

 2 Bacteriology Department, Ahri, Mansoura Branch. ARC

3 Poultry diseases Dep. AHRI, Mansoura Branch. ARC .

Introduction:

 Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogen capable of infecting humans and a wide variety of animals. This bacterium affects rabbits of different ages, infects dermal lesions and invades subcutaneous tissues , resulting in different pathologies including suppurative dermatitis, mastitis, multisystemic abscessation and pododermatitis . The ability of S. aureus to cause disease is due to a combination of virulence factors. Bacteria are considered major risk factors for diseases of respiratory system , skin , the eye and other septicemia in rabbits. Bacterial infection following ulceration of paws and urine burns  was the likely cause to Sore hocks/chronic ulcerative pododermatitis and arthritis and osteomyelitis (Jawad et al 2018).

 Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) are resistant to all currently available β-lactam antibiotics, including penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and their derivatives. Resistance to methicillin is mediated by the mecA gene which encodes an altered penicillin binding protein, located in the cell wall that has a low affinity for β-lactam antibiotics. The mecA gene resides on a large heterogeneous mobile genetic element called the staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC) (Katayama and Hiramatsu, 2000). This mecA encodes for an altered penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a or PBP20). The PBP2a has a lower affinity for beta-lactam antimicrobials than the normal PBP so antimicrobials are ineffective (Arias and Murray, 2009) This SCC containing the mecA gene can spread horizontally between staphylococcal populations (Brody et al., 2009).

The incidence of pathogenic microorganisms that developed resistance to commonly used antibiotics has become a 21st century global issue. The microorganisms of key importance are, above all, those of the Staphylococcus aureus species, especially methicillin resistant strains–MRSA (Šťástková  et al, 2009)

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a critically important human pathogen that is also an emerging concern in veterinary medicine and animal agriculture (Weese, 2010).                                                                        

MRSA detection has been reported in cattle, horses, poultry (Lee, 2003) and pigs (Voss et al., 2005). It has also been found in pet animals such as dogs and cats (Dequette and Nuttall, 2004) as well as in some exotic animals (O’Mahony et al., 2005).

Several detection methods based on phenotypic expression of the mecA gene have been evaluated for diagnosing MRSA including antimicrobial susceptibility testing, PBP2a latex agglutination test kit, oxacillin agar screen test, and cefoxitin disk diffusion test (Diab et al., 2008). While these tests showed reasonable sensitivity and specificity for detecting MRSA when used in combination with either the tube coagulase test or a commercial biochemical typing system to presumptively identify staphylococci to the species level, these tests rely on phenotypic expression of the mecA gene. Molecular detection of the mecA gene using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is considered the gold standard for making a definitive diagnosis of methicillin resistance S. aureus(Counts et al., 2007 and Francois et al., 2008).

 The genetic variability and relationships among the isolates were established by random amplified polymorphic DNA(RAPD)-PCR analysis (Salgado-Ruiz et al., 2015). Repetitive element palindromic-PCR (Rep-PCR) has been identified as a simple PCR-based technique with the following characteristics: (i) low cost, (ii) high discriminatory power, (iii) suitable for a high throughput of strains, and (iv) considered to be a trusty tool for classifying and typing a wide range of Gram-negative and several Gram positive bacteria (Abdollahi et al., 2016).

This work designed to study:

1-The incidence of Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in diseased rabbits tissue samples and to evaluate the accuracy and the sensitivity of duplex PCR in the diagnosis.

2-Confermation of  MRSA strain virulence through experimental design.

3-Detection of  diversity of MRSA by repetitive sequence polymerase chain reaction (Rep-PCR).

 

Materials and Methods:

Sample collection:

            Atotal of  150  samples were collected from diseased and dead rabbits from private farms including 50 abscess swabs, 20 liver samples, 20 lung samples, 30 infected wound swabs and 30 mastitic milk samples as showen in table (1).

 

Table (1): Numbers and types of the collected samples:

 

Sample ( No)

Source (No)

Liver ( 20)

Lung ( 20)

 

Dead rabbits (40)

abscess swab ( 50)

infected wound swab (30)

mastitic milk ( 30)

 

Diseased rabbits (110)

(150)

Total              (150)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Bacteriological examination:

 

 It was carried out following standard methods (Quinn et al., 1994)  and (Woo Yong-Ku and Kim Shin 2005).  Briefly, a loopful of each  sample was streaked onto 7% sheep blood agar (Merck). Staphylococci and Micrococci were identified based on their growth characteristics on mannitol salt agar, coagulase production by using Staphylect plus reagent (Oxoid), catalase and oxidase tests.

 

Oxacillin Screening Agar test (Detection of MRSA strains):

 

 Test was performed according to Jain et al. (2008) with some modification. Briefly, plates were prepared with Mueller–Hinton agar supplemented with 4% (w/v) NaCl containing oxacillin at a concentration of 6µg ml-1 (OSA 6µg ml-1 ). The plates were spot inoculated with a cotton swab dipped into a 0.5 McFarland standard suspension of each isolate, Oxacillin resistance was confirmed by bacterial growth after 24 h incubation at 35ºC aerobically.

 

Experimental design:

 

 In this study 60 rabbits (Three months old white newzeland rabbits), with body weight ranged between (2000- 2500gm.) were used. The animals were kept in cages of (20*30*50) cm³ dimensions one rabbit per each cage, one month before study for acclimatization in optimum conditions of breeding at (22±3) ºC with a (14/10) hours (Light/Dark) cycle. Commercial feed pellets and drinking water were given all the time of experiment.

Inoculum:

 

S. aureus (MRSA) strain used in this research isolated from mastitic case.

Sixty rabbits were used as laboratory animal models in an experiment designed to study the pathogenicity of S. aureus and divided randomly into infected group(n=30) with a dose of 1x107CFU/ml of MRSA S.aureus subcutaneously (S/C), and control group ( n=30)with sterile distilled water was given by same route.

Clinical assessment:

 After inoculation, rabbits were monitored daily for development of clinical signs in the form of abscess formation, conjunctivitis, keratitis, arthritis, cough, weight loss or lethargy

Euthanasia:

 On day 15 after inoculation (the end point of the study), rabbits were euthanized and re-isolation of  (MRSA) strain was performed and confermed by bacteriological and molecular methods.

Staphylococcus aureus culture for DNA extraction:

 Bacterial growth for the purpose of DNA extraction was prepared as follows: 20 µl of stock solution was streaked onto a Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar plate (prepared as specified, Oxoid Australia Pty Ltd, Adelaide) and cultured overnight at 37ºC. the following day a single colony was selected and suspended in a 5 ml falcon tube (Becton Dickinson, New South Wales, Australia) containing BHI broth (prepared as specific, Oxoid Australia Pty Ltd, Adelaide) and cultured overnight at 37ºC, with shaking.

 

DNA Extraction: 

According to Stephens (2008) , from the overnight BHI broth culture, 1 ml was extracted using the Qiagen DNA extraction Kit (Qiagen, Victoria, Australia), as per manufacturer’s instructions, including lysostaphin at 200 µg/ml for the lysis step. Purified DNA samples were eluted using ddH2O and stored at -20ºC.

 

 

Quantification of DNA:

Concentration and purity of DNA samples from the Qiagen DNA extraction kit were determined by measuring the absorbance at 260 and 280 nm using an Bio-Rad biophotometer with each DNA sample diluted 1/100.

DNA amplification and Analysis:

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Standard PCR amplifications were performed using a Bio-Rad Research Thermocycler in 0.2 ml PCR tubes.

Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction:

Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction for detection of Staphylococcus aureus species specific 16S rRNA and (SCCmec) type IV genes (responsible for methicillin resistance): Two sets of primer pairs were used,the first one was Staph756F

(5'-AACTCTGTTATTAGGGAAGAAC-3') and Staph750R

 (5'-CCACCTTCCTCCGGTTTGTCACC-3') primers which could amplify 756 base pair fragments specific for 16S rRNA of S. aureus; the second one was SCCmec 4a1 (5'-TTTAATGCCCATGAATAAAAT-3') and SCCmec 4a2 (5'-AGAAAAGATAGAAGTTCGAAAGA-3') primers which could amplify 450 base pair fragments specific for SCCmec subtype IVa gene according to Ryffel et al.(1990).

The reaction mixtures consisted of 5 µl of the extracted DNA template of the bacterial isolates, 5 µl 10× PCR buffer (75 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.0, 2 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 20 mM (NH4)2SO4), 1 µl dNTPs (40 µM), 1 µl (1U Ampli Taq DNA polymerase), 1 µl (50 pmol) from the forward and reverse primers. The two sets of primer pairs were used in each reaction mixture and the volume of the reaction mixture was completed to 50 µl using DDW. 40 µl paraffin oil was added and the thermal cycler was adjusted as follows: 94°C for 5 min, followed by 10 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min., and 72°C for 1.5 min, and 25 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 50°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1.5 min, followed by final extension at 72°C for 1.5 min, and the PCR products were stored in the thermal cycler at 4°C until they were collected.

PCR product were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized on 1.5% agarose gel with a UV light transilluminator.

 Rep-PCR analysis:

 For repetitive sequence analysis, PCR conditions for Staphylococcus isolates in the present investigations were standardized. Four  repetitive sequence primers ( Rep-1, Rep-2, Rep-12and Rep-18 ) were used to amplify genomic DNA of the S. aureus isolates according to (Woo Yong-Ku and Kim Shin 2005). Following the experiments for optimization of component concentrations, PCR amplification of repetitive sequence primers were carried out in 25 μl volume containing 1 μl (20 ng) of genomic DNA, 12.5 μl of Go Taq® Green Master Mix, Promega, USA. 1 μl of primer (20 p.mol), deionizerD distilled water (up to a total volume of 25 μl). For DNA amplification, the C1000TM Thermo Cycler Bio-Rad, Germany, was programmed under the conditions involving denaturation at 94°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, primer annealing at 52°C for 45 Sec and primer extension at 72°C for 2.5 min; final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. Data analysis In order to determine the genetic relationship among studied bacteria, Rep-PCR data were scored for presence (1) or absence (0) of the bands using Gene Tools software from Syngene. A simple matching coefficient was estimated by means of the Jaccard’s coefficient to construct a similarity matrix. Cluster analysis and dendrogram were produced on the basis of the unweighted average pair group method (UPGMA) using the NTSYS-PC Statistical Package (Rohlf, 2000. Control marker with molecular mass of 100bp was used (fermentase, Lithuania).

Result:

 Bacteriological findings:

 

  S. aureus was isolated from 27 cases with a percentage of 18 % , including 7 isolates resistant to methicillin with a percentage of 4.7% and 20 isolates were sensitive to methicillin (MSSA) with a percentage of 13.3% , both were differentiated by the Oxacillin Screening Agar test.

 

Table (2): Occurrence of  MSSA and MRSA in examined samples:

 

MRSA

MSSA

Sample ( No)

Source (No)

1

-

2

2

Liver ( 20)

Lung ( 20)

 

Dead rabbits (40)

2

2

2

 

8

4

4

abscess swab ( 50)

infected wound swab (30)

mastitic milk ( 30)

 

Diseased rabbits (110)

7

20

(150)

Total              (150)

 

 

Experimental  infection  observations

 

- Clinical Findings were monitored daily for development of clinical signs on the experimentally infected rabbits as well as control group.

 -Control rabbits had no clinical signs, where as infected rabbits displayed abscess formation,conjunctivitis,keratitis,artheritis, cough,weight loss , lethargy and weight loss with different degrees as shown in table (3).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure (1):

experimentally infected rabbit showing conjunctivitis, keratitis and facial abscess.

 

 

Table (3):Clinical manifestations developed in experimentally infected rabbits:

 

Development of clinical signs /days of infection

Group

15th day

10th day

7th day

3rd day

 

 

Infected

 

 

 

Lethargy (30)* Abscess(20)*

Conjunctivitis (15)*

Keratitis (10)*

Lethargy (30)* Abscess(15)*

Conjunctivitis (10)*

Keratitis (5)*

Lethargy (25)*

Abscess(10)*

Conjunctivitis (3)*

Lethargy (15)*

-

-

-

-

Control

 

*=No of rabbits affected

 

 

-Weight loss was noticed in all rabbits of the infected group. 

 

-MASA experimentally injected strain could be recovered and confirmed bacteriologically and molecularly form all infected group rabbits.                                                                                                                                                                                                     

 

 

Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction results:

 

Multiplex PCR for detection of S. aureus species specific 16S rRNA and (SCCmec) type IVa genes were performed.

Strains previously identified phenotypically as S. aureus with bacteriological examination were used in PCR run. All strains are positive for amplification of 756 base fragments specific for 16S rRNA of S. aureus using Staph756 F and Staph750 R primers, while 7 strains (known from antimicrobial sensitivity assay as methecillin resistant) showed positive amplification of 450 base pair fragments specific for SCCmec subtype IVa genes using SCCmec 4a1 and SCCmec 4a2 primers, as shown in Figure (2).

 

 

 

Figure ( 2). Agarose gel electrophoresis showing:

 Lane M :100 bp ladder.

Lanes 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 showing amplification of 756 bp fragments of

 16S rRNA.

 Lanes1,2,3,4, 5, 6 and 7 showing amplification of 450 bp fragments of SCC mec IVa gene.

+ve :control positive.

-ve :control negative.

 

Rep-PCR analysis:

 

 

 

 

 

Figure (3): Rep-PCR profile of 7 (MRSA) isolates generated with 4 repetitive sequence primers. First lane on each panel is 100 bp molecular weight markers.

 

 

 

 

Figure (4): Dendrogram analysis among the 7 MRSA based on the 4 repetitive sequence primers.

Table (4): Polymorphic bands of Rep-PCR primers and percentage of polymorphism in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from rabbits:

 

 

Primers

Total

Bands

No. of

Monomorphic

Bands

No.

Polymorphic

Bands

%

Monomorphic

bands

%

Polymorphic

bands

Rep-1

13

7

6

53.8

46.2

Rep-2

14

5

9

35.7

64.3

Rep-12

13

7

6

53.8

46.2

Rep-18

15

7

8

46.7

53.3

Total

55

26

29

47.5

52.5

 

Discussion:

 Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogen capable of infecting humans and a wide variety of animals. Commonly rabbits affected by this bacterium resulting in different pathologies including suppurative dermatitis, mastitis, multisystemic abscessation and pododermatitis .

Bacteriological examination of 150 samples collected from diseased and dead rabbits(table (1)). Results revealed the isolation of Staphylococcus aureus from 18% of examined samples. (MRSA)  present at a percentage of 4.7% while (MSSA) at a percentage of 13.3% of total S. aureus isolates as shown in table (2).This percentage considered high and because of the organisms potensity to acquire antimicrobial resistance, whereas most infections can be treated or prophylacted with antibiotics; antimicrobial resistance of

 S. aureus especially methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) continues to be a problem for clinicians worldwide (Shittu and Lin 2006) .

 Experimentally injected rabbit group showed clinical signs of infection including lethargy, weight loss, abscess formation. Conjunctivitis and Keratitis progressed along the period of the study as mentioned in table (3).

The body weight along the period of the study which showed a significant decrease

 (P<0.05)was due to systemic reaction against the bacterial infection and it toxins on enteral organs which confirmed by positive isolation of bacteria and the effect of bacterial toxin on the digestive system which effect the absorption of food from intestine (Jawad et al, 2018).

 MRSA experimentally injected strain could be recovered and confirmed bacteriologically and molecularly form all infected group rabbits.                                                                                                                                                                                                      

To determine susceptibility to methicillin, following CLSI recommendations, oxacillin was used, as it is more stable than methicillin in the lab conditions and is able to recognize cross resistance. In addition, agar screen method was used which is preferable to the disk diffusion method CLSI (2021).

The results confirmed the conclusion of Riffon et al. (2001). Because PCR could detect the mecA gene in all 7 strains out of 8 examined strains which appeared methicillin / oxacillin resistant phenotypicaly with Oxacillin screening agar test. Also, Štastkova et al. (2009) found that 23 isolates of                                  

S.aureus were identified phenotypically and genotypically as resistant to methicillin. And The mecA gene was confirmed in all of these MRSA isolates.

 All 27 S. aureus isolates identified by conventional tests were confirmed as S. aureus genotypically by PCR. While 7 of 27 (4.7%) S. aureus isolates were found to be methicillin resistant  (MRSA) in PCR. This may be explained as conventional susceptibility tests such as agar disc diffusion and broth dilution methods may not give reliable results in detecting MRSA because of heterogenic expression of resistance. Also, the authers classified the S. aureus lack mecA gene and resist oxacillin as false resistant by the oxacillin disc diffusion method and the authers considered that it may due to another resistance mechanism such as hyperproduction of beta-lactamase. The discrepancy between results may be attributed to the differences in method of methicillin resistance detection, we use oxacillin screening agar test which more efficacy in detection of resistance.           

Rep-PCR   is a   new typing   method that differentiates   microbes   by using primers complementary to interspersed repetitive consensus sequences that enable amplification of diverse-sized DNA fragments consisting of sequences between the repetitive elements, the technique utilizes repetitive sequence oligonucleotides, is particularly a powerful tool for genetic studies and it is useful as a screening genotyping method and can generate various fingerprint patterns with unlimited number of fragments (Woo Yong-Ku and Kim Shin 2005).  

 Four Rep-PCR primers were used for estimating of genetic diversity of MRSA isolates. Reactions were performed in duplicate and all amplification products were found to be reproducible (Fig. 3 and Table 4).

Results using primer Rep-1 has showed a total of 13 bands sized ranged from 150-2800 bp long in all seven MRSA isolates. Seven common bands were observed in all isolates which exhibited about 53.8 % monomorphism, while the other 6 fragments have showed 46.2% polymorphism (Table 4).

In case of (Rep-12) primer, a total of 6 fragments have showed 46.2% polymorphism among the 7 MRSA isolates (Figure 3). The molecular size of the amplicon products ranged from 150-2300 bp long. Also, this primer recognized different unique fragments at 2200 bp specific to isolate S4 and S7, respectively.

In case of (Rep-2 and Rep-18) primers, about 35.7 %  and 46.7% monomorphism,respectively.while 64.3% and 53.3% polymorphism,respectively.

 

The four primers preduced about 55 fragments,26 of them consider as monomorphic bands with about 47.5% and other 29 fragments consider as polymorphic bands with about 52.5%. According to genetic similarity and intraspecies differentiation, the seven MRSA isolates were grouped into two main different clusters with about 75% genetic similarity. S6 isolate was

found to be alone in the first cluster. while, the second cluster was divided to two sub-clusters. The firist sub-cluster contained S4 and S1 only, while S2, S3, S5 andS7 were grouped in the second sub-cluster (Figure 4).

Rep-PCR technique was proved to be useful genetic markers used for fingerprinting of S. aureus strains isolated from clinical and subclinical cases. Although major bands from Rep-PCR reactions are highly reproducible, minor bands can difficult to repeat due to repetitive sequence priming nature of this PCR reaction and potential confounding effects associated with co-migration with other markers (Woo Yong-Ku and Kim Shin 2005). Because AP-PCR has its limitations for widespread use, another more reproducible  PCR method should be considered. The Rep-PCR has been described for the molecular genotyping of S. aureus (Alharthi et al., 2016). It also generates strain-specific DNA fragments when S. aureus DNA is used as an amplification template (Hassan et al., 2014).

 

Conclusion:

            It was concluded that, MRSA infection leads to great economic losses in rabbit industry due to high mortalities and treatment costs.

Multiplex PCR have the same sensitivity and accuracy as isolation and identification of S. aureus methicillin resistance, but with less labor and very little time in comparing with the traditional method of isolation and identification. While the PCR is more expensive than traditional methods, but rapid diagnosis of MRSA in rabbit farms help in rapid treatment and rapid cure which means money save.

The multiple primer sets in Rep-PCR analysis can be used as a rapid method for preliminary biotyping of  S. aureus strains.

- Abdollahi,   S.,   Ramazanzadeh,   R.,   Khiabani,   Z.D.   , Kalantar,   E. 2016. Epidemiological and Inducible Resistance in Coagulase Negative Staphylococci Global. J. Health Sci., 8(4): 109-119.
-Alharthi, A. A., Gaber, A. , Hassan, M. M. 2016. Molecular Characterization of mecA and SCCmec Genes in Pathogenic Staphylococcus spp. Collected from Hospitals in Taif Region, KSA. Biotechnology, 15(1): 26-34
-Arias CA Murray BE. 2009. Antibiotic-resistant bugs in the 21st century – a clinical super-challenge. N Engl J Med; 360(5): 439–443.
-Brody T, Yavatkar AS, Lin Y. 2009. Horizontal gene transfers link a human MRSA pathogen to contagious bovine mastitis bacteria. PLoS ONE, 3(8): e3074.
-Counts JM, Astles JR, Tenover FC. 2007. Systems approach to improving antimicrobial susceptibility testing in clinical laboratories in the United States. J Clin Micro; 45(7): 2230–2234
-CLSI. 2021. Performance Standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing ,
 31st Edition. CLSI document M100.
-Dequette R.A., Nuttall T.J. 2004. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in dogs and cats: an emerging problem? The Journal of Small Animal Practice, 45, 591–597
-Diab M, El-Damarawy M, Shemis 2008. Rapid identification of methicillin-resistant staphylococci bacteremia among intensive care unit patients. Medscape J Med; 10(5):126.
-Francois P, Hochmann A, Huyghe A. 2008. Rapid and high throughput genotyping of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates by automated multilocus variable-number of tandem repeats: a tool for real-time epidemiology. J. Microbiol. Methods; 72(3):296– 305.  
-Hassan M. M., Belal B. E. 2016. Antibiotic resistance and virulence genes in Enterococcus strains isolated from different hospitals in Saudi Arabia, Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip., 30(4): 726-732 .
-Hassan, M. M., Gaber,A. ,  El-Hallous, E.I. 2014. Morphological and Molecular characterization of some Trichoderma spp. from Egyptian soil. Wulfinia, 21: 80-96.
-Jain, A.; Agarwal, A. , Verma, R. K. 2008. Cefoxitin disc diffusion test for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococci. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 57: 957–961.
- Jawad ZainabJamal M, Zainab Ismail Ibrahim, Aseel Ismail Ibrahim 2018.
Study the pathologic effect of Staphylococcus aureus post infection in rabbits ,Basrah Journal of Veterinary Research,Vol.17, No.3
-Katayama Y, Ito T, Hiramatsu K. 2000. A new class of genetic element, Staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec, encodes methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother., 44:1549–1555.
-Lee J.H. 2003. Methicillin (oxacillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from major food animals and their potential transmission to human. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69: 6489–6494.
-O’Mahony R., Abbott Y., Leonard F.C., Markey B.K., Quinn P.J., Pollock P.J., Fanning S., Rossney A. S. 2005. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from animals and veterinary personnel in Ireland. Veterinary Microbiology, 109, 285–296.
-Quinn, PJ., Carter, ME., Markey, BK , Carter, GR .1994. Clinical veterinary microbiology. 1st Edn., London, Mosby. PP: 22-91.
 -Riffon, R., K. Sayasith. H. Khalil, P. Dubreuil, M. Drolet, J. Lagace. 2001. Development of a rapid and sensitive test for identification of major pathogens in bovine mastitis by PCR. J. Clinical Microbiol., 39(7): 2584-2589.       
-Ryffel C, Tesch W, Birch-Machin I, Reynolds PE, Barberis-Maino L, Kayser FH.1990. Sequence comparison of mecA genes isolated from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Gene 1990; 94: 137-138.
-Salgado-Ruiz, T. B., Rodríguez, A., Gutiérrez, D., Martínez, B., García, P. 2015.Molecular characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus.Veterinary Microbiology, 108, 245–256.
-Shittu, A. O. and Lin, J. 2006. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and characterization of clinical isolates of S. aureus in Kwazulu-Natal Province, South Africa. BMC Infect. Dis., 6 (1): 125.
-ŠťáStkoVá, S.; karpíŠkoVá, S. and karpíŠkoVá, K. 2009. Findings of Methicillin-Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus aureus in Livestock. Czech J. Food Sci., 27: Special Issue 2: S2-36–S2-41
-Stephens, A. J. 2008. The development of rapid genotyping methods for methicillin-resistance Staphylococcus aureus. A thesis in Molecular Microbiology, School of life Science, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technologym Brisbane, Australia.
-Voss A., Loeffen F., Bakker J., Klaasen C., Wulf M. 2005. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 11, 1965– 1966.
-Weese, J.S.  2010. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Animals ILAR Journal Volume 51, Number 3 2010
-Woo Yong-Ku and Kim Shin 2005. Molecular Typing of Staphylococcus aureus Strains from Domestic Animals and Humans by REP-PCR Analysis. Korean Journal of Microbiology;41(1).