Bovine Respiratory diseases in calves (BRD)

Document Type : Reviews articles

Abstract

Diseases of the bovine respiratory system are among the most common and significant illnesses affecting the cattle business worldwide. It is a multifactorial syndrome brought on by a confluence of environmental stressors, animal immunological response, and infectious organisms such as bacteria and viruses. For prevention and control efforts to be effective, BRD is necessary. These consist of appropriate immunization schedules, stress-reduction strategies, and early identification tactics.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


      Bovine Respiratory diseases in calves (BRD)

Rasha B. EL-Sharkawy , Soad Mekawy , Amira S. El-rafie , Noha M. Abd El- Glil , Salma S. Labeb

Department of Pathology, Department of Bacteriology, Animal Health Research    Institute (AHRI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC) Egypt

*Corresponding author: Email: Dr.rosha.elsharkawy@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT

Diseases of the bovine respiratory system are among the most common and significant illnesses affecting the cattle business worldwide. It is a multifactorial syndrome brought on by a confluence of environmental stressors, animal immunological response, and infectious organisms such as bacteria and viruses. For prevention and control efforts to be effective, BRD is necessary. These consist of appropriate immunization schedules, stress-reduction strategies, and early identification tactics.

 

Keywords: BRD , Haptoglobin , fibrinogen , Phagocytosis , PCO2 , IgM , MDA , Draxxin, Meloxicam , Sympro.

INTRODUCTION

The prevention and management of BRD have received more attention in recent years because of its significant effects on the dairy and cattle industries' profitability and productivity. The illness frequently manifests soon after stressful situations like weaning, moving, or traveling, which weaken the immune system and provide an environment that is conducive to infections. The disease is primarily caused by primary viral agents like Bovine Herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1), Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV), and Bovine Respiratory Syncytial Virus (BRSV). Secondary bacterial infections like Mannheimia hemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and Mycoplasma bovis frequently follow.  The severity of lung lesions and clinical symptoms is influenced by these infections (Bednarek et al., 2012, Chai et al.,2022, Brito et al., 2023) .

A comprehensive strategy that includes appropriate immunization programs, stress management techniques, nutritional support, and prompt treatment interventions is necessary for effective BRD care. Furthermore, the investigation of other approaches such immunomodulators, probiotics, and phytogenic substances has been prompted by growing worries about antimicrobial resistance. In order to enable timely and precise therapy, ongoing research endeavors seek to better understand pathogen-host interactions and find early diagnostic markers.(Andrews, 2004 and Donlon etal.,2023).
Review methodology:

This review attempts to give a thorough overview of publications published between 1914 and the present. It was done using Google and includes all relevant articles, regardless of the type of magazine or publisher.  Includes the pathophysiology, clinical signs , diagnostic techniques, etiological variables, and current BRD treatment and prevention strategies. It helps to improve disease management procedures and raise the productivity and health of cattle by bringing attention to recent developments and difficulties. Calves, BRD, phagocytosis, Pco2, haptoglobin, fibrinogen, MDA, diagnosis, and treatment were all included in the search phrases.

Causes and development of BRD:

The causes of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) are complex and mostly include interactions between pathogenic pathogens and environmental stresses. The disorder is mostly caused by viral pathogens, including Parainfluenza-3 Virus (PI3V), Bovine Respiratory Syncytial Virus (BRSV), Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV), and Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis Virus (IBRV). By impairing the animal's immune system, these viruses open the door for more serious bacterial infections. The most commonly implicated bacteria are Mycoplasma bovis, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni, and Mannheimia hemolytica. (Robb et al., 2007 and Donlon et al. , 2023 ).

The severity and stage of the infection affect the clinical manifestations of BRD. Fever, coughing, nasal discharge, elevated respiratory rate, lethargy, and decreased feed intake are typical symptoms (Nutsch et al., 2005). Animals with severe pneumonia may exhibit symptoms like cyanosis, open-mouth breathing, and profuse salivation. Effective management and a decrease in death rates depend on early detection of these indicators (Robb et al., 2007 and Duanghathai et al., 2022).

Animals with a robust immune system are capable of effectively combating viral infections; however, cattle experiencing immune suppression due to stressful conditions can no longer fend off these viral agents, which then penetrate the respiratory tract and disrupt the protective barriers of the normal trachea and lungs. Once these defenses are compromised, bacterial agents can infect the respiratory system (Powell, 1914). The onset of Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) is triggered by environmental stressors and viral infections that diminish the lung's defense mechanisms, facilitating bacterial colonization. The mixing of cattle from various sources and significant fluctuations in environmental temperatures are primary factors that lead to disease outbreaks in feedlots (Robb et al., 2007, Duanghathai et al., 2022).

Table: Causes of BRD (Bagley , 1997)

Stress Factors

Viral Agents

Bacteria

Heat , Cold , Anxiety, Dust

Nutritional deficiencies

Irritant gases , Surgery

Dampness, Injury , Fatigue

Dehydration, Hunger

PI3, IBR , BVD, BRSV

Adenovirus, Reovirus

Rhinovirus, Enterovirus

Herpesvirus IV , MCF

Pasteurella haemolytica

Hemophilus

Other

BRD is multifactorial:

Pre-and post-weaning factors affecting bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in beef calves and resulting outcomes of the disease (Lynch et al., 2010).

Transporting cattle from various herds can introduce different bacterial and viral flora. This exposure usually happens alongside the stress related to shipping, which can include adverse weather conditions, alterations in feed and water sources, and moving to a new location. The combination of transportation, the stress factors involved, and the encounter with unfamiliar bacterial and viral pathogens raises the likelihood of respiratory diseases in cattle that have recently been shipped (Robb et al., 2007 and Duanghathai et al., 2022).

Clinical findings and Diagnosis of BRD :

The development of BRD typically begins with a viral infection that damages the respiratory epithelium and disrupts the mechanisms of mucociliary clearance. This situation facilitates the invasion and colonization of bacteria in the lower respiratory tract. The immune system of the host reacts to these pathogens, which often results in excessive inflammation and damage to lung tissue, worsening respiratory distress and hindering the exchange of oxygen. (Assie et al., 2004, Snowder et al., 2005, and Chai et al., 2022).

Accurate diagnosis of Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) necessitates both clinical assessment and laboratory analysis. Veterinarians often employ methods like nasal swabs for pathogen identification through PCR, serological assays, thoracic auscultation, radiographic imaging, and ultrasonography. Additionally, necropsy results can offer further understanding of the disease's severity and help in identifying the causative organisms.

Erythrogram:

Calves with diseases exhibited a notable reduction in RBC count, hemoglobin concentration, and packed cell volume in those affected by pneumonia (El-Bealawy, 2003 and Faris et al., 2010). Calves with respiratory illnesses demonstrated a significant decline in RBC count, hemoglobin concentration, and packed cell volume, with no significant changes observed in MCV, MCH, or MCHC (Faris and Abd El-Hamied, 2007; El-Bealawy, 2003 and Ahmed and Abd El-Hamied, 2006).

Leukogram:

Neutrophils serve as the initial line of cellular defense against pathogens, while lymphocytes play a crucial role in both cell-mediated and humoral immunity (Paape et al., 2003 and Janeway et al., 2005). Meanwhile, several research studies have investigated the function and distribution of neutrophils and lymphocytes (Buckham et al., 2007 and Riondato et al., 2008) in both naturally occurring and experimentally induced cases of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) (Coomber et al., 2001 and Sandbulte and Roth 2002).

Biochemical Parameters in the Blood:

Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) in calves can be identified through biochemical blood tests conducted in a laboratory. Parameters like blood gases (pH, PCO2, PO2, tCO2, and HCO3) are crucial for providing insights into the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of diseases impacting the respiratory system and acid-base equilibrium (Radostits et al., 2005). The hypoxia associated with pneumonia affects the blood's oxygen-carrying capacity, leading to alterations in the balance of blood gases (Cambier et al., 2002). There was a notable rise in PCO2 and HCO3 levels, accompanied by a significant drop in both pH and PO2 levels.

Proteinogram:

Serum protein electrophoresis is a laboratory method utilized to separate serum proteins based on their size and electrical charge, thereby enabling the identification and quantification of different protein fractions (Ceron et al., 2010). The protein profile of the affected animals prior to treatment indicated that the overall serum protein levels were not significantly different, while a notable decrease in albumin was observed when compared to the healthy control group. The protein electrophoresis results for the diseased calves before treatment showed substantial alterations, with increased levels of α-globulin and total γ-globulin (Faris et al., 2010).

When comparing sick animals to clinically healthy calves of the same age and breed, calves with chronic respiratory illnesses displayed significantly elevated total serum protein levels relative to healthy calves, whereas the sick calves exhibited a significant shift in the concentrations of most protein fractions, presenting significantly higher amounts of α1, β1, β2, and γ-globulins, and lower albumin levels than those found in healthy calves (Tothova et al., 2012 and Csilla et al., 2013).

The protein profile of the affected animals indicated that the total serum protein levels were not significantly altered, attributed to the rise in serum globulin levels as a reaction to respiratory infections (El-Bealawy, 2003 and Faris and Abd El-El-Hamied, 2007).

 

Inflammatory markers:

The impact of BRD extends beyond the respiratory system; it also influences whole-body energy and nitrogen metabolism by triggering the immune response. Most studies on metabolite alterations due to BRD have concentrated on acute phase proteins, particularly serum fibrinogen and, most notably, haptoglobin (Baumann and Gauldie, 1994).

The concentration of serum haptoglobin (Hp) has been proposed as a method for guiding management decisions, based on findings showing an association between Hp levels and the need for treatment in cattle with BRD. Hp is an acute-phase protein synthesized by the liver in response to cellular damage. By assessing Hp concentration upon arrival, producers could potentially identify which animals are likely to stay healthy (Step et al., 2008).

Circulating levels of acute-phase proteins, such as serum haptoglobin, rise in response to infection and inflammation in cattle (Richeson et al., 2013).

Calves with the disease exhibited a marked increase in serum haptoglobin compared to healthy calves, and their levels significantly dropped in all treated calves, especially in groups B and C by the 10th day post-treatment, where the markers' levels nearly equaled those of the healthy calves (Eleiwa et al., 2014).

Oxidative status:       

Reduced antioxidant capacity, along with heightened oxidative stress markers, significantly contributes to the development of the syndrome within the initial three weeks post-transport (Chirase et al., 2004). Oxidative stress is believed to be a crucial factor in the onset of various lung diseases, not only due to direct damaging effects but also through its role in the molecular pathways that govern lung inflammation (Macnee, 2001). Calves with disease exhibited a marked increase in the average serum MDA levels when compared to healthy calves (Eleiwa et al., 2014).

Immunity:

A- Changes in Immunoglobins:

Newborn heifers that experienced a failure of passive transfer of colostral immunoglobulins faced a higher risk of developing BRD compared to those that received sufficient colostral antibodies (Van Der Fels-Klerxi et al., 2002). Blood samples were obtained 24 hours after birth to assess plasma protein and serum immunoglobulin (IgG) levels. Respiratory illness in feedlot calves was linked to lower plasma protein levels, though serum IgG levels were not affected at 24 hours postpartum. Calves with insufficient plasma proteins at 24 hours after birth were at a greater risk of illness and respiratory conditions in the feedlot in contrast to those with adequate plasma proteins. These findings indicate that beef cattle producers should effectively manage both cows and calves to ensure successful passive transfer (Godden, 2008; Ackermann et al., 2010; Berman et al., 2022).

B-Changes in cellular immunity:

The presence of viruses within the bovine respiratory tract may modify the microenvironment of mucosal surfaces and the structure of bacteria, resulting in impaired mucociliary function and damage to cilia. Furthermore, viral infections may lower the levels of antimicrobial peptides, affecting bacterial adherence and invasion by modifying the host immune response. Diseased calves suffering from BRD prior to treatment showed a notable reduction in both the percentage of phagocytosis and the phagocytic index, whereas treatment with flumethasone led to a significant decline in cellular immunity on the 3rd and 7th days following treatment. In contrast, treating the calves with meloxicam did not affect any measures of cellular immunity, as reported by Faris et al. (2010). Diseased calves exhibited a significant rise in phagocytic activity (%) and the phagocytic index when compared to healthy calves. Calves treated with oxytetracycline (20 mg/kg bwt twice with a 48-hour interval) and Floxon (0.5 ml/10kg bwt) showed a significant decrease in both phagocytic activity (%) and the phagocytic index on the 3rd and 10th days post-treatment, while calves in the group receiving 5 mg/kg bwt daily revealed no significant changes when compared to diseased calves prior to treatment, as stated by Eleiwa et al. (2014).

Treatment of BRD:

The treatment of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) often includes antibiotics to address bacterial infections, along with anti-inflammatory drugs and supportive care measures like fluid therapy and nutritional assistance. Nevertheless, due to increasing worries about antibiotic resistance, management strategies that integrate multiple approaches are being prioritized. These strategies comprise effective vaccination programs against viral and bacterial pathogens, stress reduction through improved management and housing conditions, and the incorporation of immunostimulants, probiotics, and phytogenics as supplementary measures. It is generally more effective to administer antibiotics or sulfa medications via drinking water instead of feed, as sick cattle tend to stop eating but usually continue to drink water for a longer period (Bagley, 1997).

A variety of approved antimicrobials are available for managing respiratory disease by treating entire groups of cattle, including tilmicosin (Micotil®, Elanco Animal Health), oxytetracycline (Tetradure®, Merial), ceftiofur crystalline free acid (Excede™, Pfizer Animal Health), florfenicol (Nuflor®, Schering-Plough Animal Health Corporation), and tulathromycin (Draxxin®, Pfizer Animal Health) (Robb et al., 2007).

Several macrolide antibiotics, such as erythromycin, tylosin, tilmicosin, spiramycin, and tulathromycin, are authorized for the treatment and/or prevention of BRD in cattle (Zhanel et al., 2001). Although these antibiotics are typically well absorbed and attain effective levels in lung tissue, many of them have a high affinity for plasma proteins, limiting their distribution outside the blood vessels (Jain and Danziger, 2004; Huang et al., 2010).

Various studies have highlighted the positive impact of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), like meloxicam, in treating BRD. This disease is economically significant, particularly in the beef feedlot sector, and a crucial aspect of the disease's pathogenesis is the harmful cycle initiated by chemotaxis and the ensuing release of lysosomal substances from neutrophils. Other inflammatory mediators contribute to the inflammatory response, causing vascular changes in the lungs and leading to fibrin deposition on the lung and pleural surfaces (Bednarek et al., 1999; Francoz et al., 2012).

 

 

 

CONCLUSION

It could be concluded that:

  • Bovine Respiratory Disease continues to pose a major risk to the cattle industry, characterized by its complicated causes and considerable financial implications. Addressing BRD calls for a comprehensive strategy that includes prevention, swift diagnosis, and timely treatment. Continued research is critical for discovering new treatment alternatives and enhancing disease management techniques, ultimately supporting improved animal health and production efficiency.
  • Respiratory illnesses impacted the hematological profile and caused alterations in both total and differential leukocyte counts. Additionally, they caused significant disruptions in blood gases, indicating respiratory acidosis, as well as changes in protein electrophoresis, various inflammatory markers, oxidative status, and finally, immunological parameters.
  • The use of draxxin combined with meloxicam in calves affected by BRD proved to be more effective than administering the antibiotic alone.
  • The combination of levamisole and draxxin improves both humoral and cellular immunity in calves affected by BRD.

 

Ahmed G.N. and Abd El-Hamied S.S. (2006): A comparison of the effect of tylosin and amoxicillin in the treatment of respiratory diseases in cattle calves. Zag. Vet. J., 34 (2): 72-80.
Ackermann M.R., Derscheid R. and Roth J.A. (2010): Innate Immunology of Bovine Respiratory Disease. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract., 26(2): 215–228.
Andrews A.H. (2004): Calf respiratory diseases. In: Bovine Medicine. edited by Andrews A. H., ISBN 0-632-05596-0, Oxford, UK, pp. 239-248.
Assie S., Seegers H.  and Beaudeau F. (2004): Incidence of respiratory disorders during housing in non‐weaned Charolais calves in cow–calf farms of Pays de la Loire (western France). Prev. Vet. Med., 63: 271‐282.
 Bagley C.V. (1997): Bovine Respiratory DiseaseProduct of Extension Beef Cattle Resource Committee Adapted from the Cattle Producer’s Library. Utah State University. Logan UT., 84322-5600.
Baumann H. and Gauldie J. (1994): The acute phase response Immunol. Today, 15:74–80.
Bednarek D., Szuster-Ciesielska A., Zdzisinska B., Kondracki M., Paduch R. and Kandefer-Szersze N.M. (1999): The effect of steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the cellular immunity of calves with experimentally induced local lung inflammation. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 71: 1–15.
Bednarek D., Czerwinska M.S. and Dudek K. (2012): Bovine respiratory syndrome (BRD) etiopathogenesis, diagnosis and control. National veterinary research institute, Department of cattle and sheep diseases, Poland. Abird-Eye view of Veterinary Medicine.7: 363 -378.
Berman J., Francoz D., Abbdallah A., Dufour S. and Buczinski S.(2022): Development and validation of a clinical respiratory disease scoring system for guiding treatment decisions in veal calves using a Bayesian framework. Jouurnal Dairy  Science.  105(12):9917-9933.
Brito B.P., Frost M. J., Anantanawat K., Jaya F., Batterham T., Djordjevic S.P., Chang W.S., Holmes E. C., Darling A. E. and Kirkland P. D.(2023): Expanding the range of the respiratory infectome in Australian feedlot cattle with and without respiratory disease using metatranscriptomics. Microbiome Veterinary Journal. 11:158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01591-1.
Buckham K.R.S., Burton J.L., Earley B. and Crowe M.A. (2007): Transportation stress in young bulls alters expression of neutrophil genes important for the regulation of apoptosis, tissue remodelling, margination, and antibacterial function. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 118:19-29.
 
Cambier C., Clerbaux T., Detry B., Marville V., Frans A. and Gustin P. (2002): Blood oxygen binding in hypoxaemic calves. Vet. Res., 33: 283-290.
Ceron J.J., Caldin M. and Martínez-Subiela S. (2010): Electrophoresis and acute phase protein measurement, In: Weiss DJ, Wandrop KJ (eds.), Schalm‘s Veterinary Haematology, Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, Ia., 1157-61.
Chai J. , Capik S. F.  KegleyB., Richeson J. T. Powell J. G. and Zhao J.(2022): Bovine respiratory microbiota of feedlot cattle and its association with disease. Veterinary Research Journal. Research 53:4
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-021-01020.
Chirase N.K., Greene L.W., Purdy Ch.W., Loan R.W., Auvermann B.W., Parker D.B., Walborg E.F., Stevenson D.E., Xu Y. and Klauning J.E. (2004): Effect of transport stress on respiratory disease, serum antioxidant status and serum concentrations of lipid peroxidation biomarkers in beef cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 65: 860-864.
Coomber B.L., Nyarko K.A., Noyes T.M. and Gentry P.A. (2001): Neutrophil-platelet interactions and their relevance to Bovine Respiratory Disease. Vet. J., 161:41-62.
 
Csilla T., Oskar N. and Gabriel K. (2013): The serum protein electrophoretic pattern and acute phase proteins concentrations in calves with chronic respiratory diseases. Acta Veterinaria (Beograd), 63 (5-6): 473-486.
Donlon J.D., Mee J.F. and McAloon C.G.(2023) : Prevalence of respiratory disease in Irish preweaned dairy calves using hierarchical Bayesian latent class analysis ORIGINAL RESEARCH article , Sec. Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics. Volume 10 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1149929
 Saipinta D.,  Panyamongkol, T.  Chuammitri Ph., and Suriyasathaporn W.  (2022): Reduction in Mortality of Calves with Bovine Respiratory Disease in Detection with Influenza C and D Virus. Animals (Basel).  Dec; 12(23): 3252.
El-Bealawy M.A. (2003): Hematological and biochemical studies on pneumonia in new born calves. Egypt. J. Agri. Res., 81 (1):253-261.
Eleiwa N.Z.H., Gad G.N.A. and El-Shorbagy A.I.A. (2014): Effect of a combined Oxytetracycline HCl/Flunixin meglumine therapy on undifferentiated respiratory disease in calves. International Journal of Advanced Research, 2 (3): 387-398.
Faris A.E.S. and Abd El-Hamied S.S.(2007): Evaluation of tulathromycin for the treatment of bacterial respiratory diseases in cattle calves .Zag. Vet. J., 35 (3): 134-141.  
Faris A.E.S., Abd El-Hamied S.S., Mohamed M.M. and Refaat S.A. (2010): A comparison on the effect of steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with antibiotic treatment of respiratory diseases in calves. Suez Canal Veterinary Journal.1110-6298.
Francoz D., Buczinski S. and Apley M. (2012): Evidence related to the use of ancillary drugs in bovine respiratory disease (anti‐inflammatory and others): are they justified or not? Vet. Clin. Food Anim., 28:23‐38.
Godden S. (2008): Colostrum Management for Dairy Calves, Vet. Clin. Food Anim. Vol. 24, 1:19-39.
Huang R.A., Letendre L.T., Banav N., Fischer J. and Somerville B. (2010): Pharmacokinetics of gamithromycin in cattle with comparasion of plasma and lung tissue concentrations and plasma antibacterial activity. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther., 33:227-237.
Jain R. and Danziger L.H. (2004): The macrolide antibiotics :a pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic overview. Curr. Pharm. Des., 10:3045-3053.
Janeway C.A., Travers M., Walport M. and Shlomchik M.J. (2005): Immunobiology, the immune system in health and disease.Garland Science Publications, New York, 6.
Lynch E.M., Earley B., McGee M. and Doyle S. (2010): Effect of abrupt weaning at housing on leukocyte distribution, functional activity of neutrophils, and acute phase protein response of beef calves. BMC Veterinary Research, pneumonia. Journal and Veterinary Advances, 8 (11): 2345-2349.
Macnee W. (2001): Oxidative stress and lung inflammation in airways disease. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 429:195-207.
Nutsch R.G.,Skogerboe T.L., Rooney K.A, Weigel D.J., Gajewski K. and Lechtenberg K.F. (2005): Comparative efficacy of tulathromycin, tilmicosin, and florfenicol in the treatment of bovine respiratory disease in stocker cattle. Vet. Ther., 6 (2): 167-179.
Paape M.J., Bannerman D.D., Zhao X. and Lee J.W. (2003): The bovine neutrophil: Structure and function in blood and milk. Vet. Res., 34:597-627.
Powell J. (1914): Livestock Health Series Bovine Respiratory Disease University of Arkansas, United States Department of Agriculture and County Governments Cooperating.
Radostits O.M., Gay C.C., Blood D.C., Arundel J.H. and Hinchcliff K.W. (2005): Veterinary Medicine, Text Book of the Diseases of Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats and Horses. B 9th Edn., W.B. Saunders, USA., pp:421-465.
Richeson J.T., Pinedo P.J., Kegley E.B., Powell J.G., Gadberry M.S., Beck P.A. and Falkenberg S.M. (2013): Association of hematologic variables and castration status at the time of arrival at a research facility with the risk of bovine respiratory disease in beef calves. JAVMA., 243 (7): 1035-1041.
Riondato F., D’Angelo A., Miniscalco B., Bellino C. and Gugliemino R. (2008): Effects of road transportation on lymphocyte subsets in calves. Vet. J., 175:364-368.
Robb E.J., Tucker C.M., Corley L., Bryson W.L., Rogers K.C., Sturgess K., Bade D.J. and Brodersen B. (2007): Efficacy of Tulathromycin versus Enrofloxacin for Initial Treatment of Naturally Occurring Bovine Respiratory Disease in Feeder Calves* This study was funded by Pfizer Animal Health, Kalamazoo, Michigan.127-135.
Sandbulte M.R. and Roth J.A. (2002): T-cell populations responsive to bovine respiratory syncytial virus in seronegative calves. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 84:111-123.
Snowder G.D., Van Vleck L.D., Cundiff L.V and Bennett G.L. (2005): Influence of breed, heterozygosity, and disease incidence on estimates of variance components of respiratory disease in preweaned beef calves. J. Anim. Sci., 83 (6): 1247‐1261.
Step D.L., Krehbiel C.R., DePra H.A., Cranston J. J., Fulton R.W., Kirkpatrick J.G., Gill D.R., Payton M.E., Montelongo M.A. and Confer A.W. (2008): Effects of commingling beef calves from different sources and weaning proto­cols during a forty-two-day receiving period on perfor­mance and bovine respiratory disease. Journal of Animal Science, 86: 3146-3158.
Sudaryatma PE., Saito A., Mekata H., Kubo M., Fahkrajang W., Mazimpaka E.and Okabayashi T.(2020): Bovine respiratory syncytial virus enhances the adherence of Pasteurella multocida to bovine lower respiratory tract epithelial cells by upregulating the platelet-activating factor receptor. Front Microbiol 11:1676.
ToaffRosenstein R., Gershwin L., Zanella A.J., and Tucker C. (2012): Characterization of the sickness response in bovine respiratory disease. Proc. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci.Annual Meeting. July 17 , Phoenix, AZ.
Tothova C., Nagy O., Seidel H. and Kovac G. (2012): The effect of chronic respiratory diseases in calves on the serum protein electrophoretic pattern. Acta. Vet. Brno., 81: 365–370.
Van Arsdall D. (2009): Pasteurellosis (Pasteurella multocida). Large Animal Internal Medicine, 3rd Ed. Mosby-Elsevier Publishing. St. Louis, MO. pp., 559-561.
Van Der Fels-Klerxi H.J. , Martin S.W. , Nielenj M. and Huirnei R.B.M. (2002): Effects on productivity and risk factors of Bovine Respiratory Disease in dairy heifers; a review for the Netherlands Netherlands. Journal  of Agricultural Science. 50, 27-45.
Zhanel G.G., Dueck M.and Hoban D.J. (2001): Review of macrolides and ketolides: focus on respiratory tract infections. Drugs, 61:443-498.