Influence of essential oil galangal and yellow mustard on multidrug resistant Bacillus cereus in chicken meat products

Document Type : Original researches

Abstract

Chicken meat products are a great way to get vitamins, minerals, and nutrients that come from animals. Nonetheless, products containing chicken meat could expose people to foodborne pathogens including Bacillus cereus (B. cereus). The current study's initial goals were to find out how common B. cereus was in chicken meat products (burger, pane, nuggets, and luncheon, 50 each) sold in Egypt's local marketplaces. Second, PCR was applied to detect B. cereus enterotoxin-coding genes, such as non-haemolytic enterotoxin (nhe), haemolysin B (hbl), and cereulide (ces), which are the causes of diarrheal and emetic illness. In addition, the disk diffusion method was used to test antibacterial sensitivity of the isolates. Lastly, an assessment was conducted on B. cereus on the antibacterial properties of essential oils of galangal and yellow mustard. The data collected showed that 26% of the chicken meat products under examination had B. cereus isolated from them. In the case of the chicken burger, pane, nuggets, and luncheon under examination, B. cereus was isolated at 40%, 32%, 20%, and 12%, respectively. The enterotoxin-coding genes (nhe, hbl, and ces) were detected in the recovered B. cereus isolates. It's likely that multidrug resistance profiling was present in the retrieved isolates. It's interesting to note that yellow mustard and galangal oils had strong anti-B. cereus activity, especially at 2% concentration. Therefore, when producing such chicken meat products, stringent hygiene procedures should be followed. In the food industry, it is strongly encouraged to utilize 2% yellow mustard and galangal oils.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


Influence of essential oil galangal and yellow mustard on multidrug resistant Bacillus cereus in chicken meat

 

Marwa Ezzat Elkenawy Mansour1, Mona Ezzat Elkenawy Mansour2, Weam Mohamed Baher1, Gamilat Abo ElMagd Elsaid1, Eman Mahmoud Abdelaziz Elmehrath1, Wageh Sobhy Darwish3

1Food Hygiene Department, Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Mansoura Branch, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Dokki, Giza, Egypt.

2Biochemistry Departmeent, Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Mansoura Branch, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Dokki, Giza, Egypt.

3Department of Food Hygiene, Safety, and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

Abstract

Chicken meat products are a great way to get vitamins, minerals, and nutrients that come from animals. Nonetheless, products containing chicken meat could expose people to foodborne pathogens including Bacillus cereus (B. cereus). The current study's initial goals were to find out how common B. cereus was in chicken meat products (burger, pane, nuggets, and luncheon, 50 each) sold in Egypt's local marketplaces. Second, PCR was applied to detect B. cereus enterotoxin-coding genes, such as non-haemolytic enterotoxin (nhe), haemolysin B (hbl), and cereulide (ces), which are the causes of diarrheal and emetic illness. In addition, the disk diffusion method was used to test antibacterial sensitivity of the isolates. Lastly, an assessment was conducted on B. cereus on the antibacterial properties of essential oils of galangal and yellow mustard. The data collected showed that 26% of the chicken meat products under examination had B. cereus isolated from them. In the case of the chicken burger, pane, nuggets, and luncheon under examination, B. cereus was isolated at 40%, 32%, 20%, and 12%, respectively. The enterotoxin-coding genes (nhe, hbl, and ces) were detected in the recovered B. cereus isolates. It's likely that multidrug resistance profiling was present in the retrieved isolates. It's interesting to note that yellow mustard and galangal oils had strong anti-B. cereus activity, especially at 2% concentration. Therefore, when producing such chicken meat products, stringent hygiene procedures should be followed. In the food industry, it is strongly encouraged to utilize 2% yellow mustard and galangal oils.

 Keywords: Bacillus cereus, virulence genes, galangal, yellow mustard.

INTRODUCTION

Chicken meat products contribute significantly since they are a competitively priced alternative to red meat, which is woefully undersupplied in Egypt. High-quality animal protein, necessary amino acids, and trace elements are abundant in this type of meat. The rapid improvements in food processing and technology have led to the production and distribution of a number of chicken meat products into the chicken meat markets, such as chicken burgers, chicken luncheon, chicken nuggets, and chicken pane. These significant products stand out for their unique flavor and scent, which attract consumers, particularly children (El Bayomi et al., 2018 and Morshdy et al., 2024).

One of the most significant foodborne pathogens, Bacillus cereus (B. cereus), is often recovered from meat and poultry meat products (Rahnama et al., 2023). B. cereus can contaminate a variety of meals and foodstuffs, such as meat, meat products, chicken meat, and chicken meat products (Aman et al., 2016). According to Liu et al. (2015), Bacillus cereus is a rod-shaped, aerobic, spore-forming Gram-positive bacterium. Worldwide, B. cereus is linked to numerous incidences of food poisoning. These negative consequences result from the presence of important B. cereus toxins, such as cereulide (ces), which causes the emetic syndrome, and non-haemolytic enterotoxin (nhe), which causes diarrheal syndrome. According to JeBberger et al. (2014), the most virulent enterotoxin of B. cereus is the nhe.

According to Darwish et al. (2013), antimicrobials are widely used in chicken farms to prevent and manage bacterial infections, as feed additives to increase the feed conversion ratio, and as preservatives in the chicken meat products business. However, foodborne bacteria have developed drug resistance as a result of the unchecked use of such antimicrobials (Alsayqh et al., 2021).

Galangal (Alpinia officinarum) is very famous spices especially for Thai foods. This spices gives taste to foods, however its medical characteristics is more important. This plant is used commonly as carminative, stomachic, antispasmodic medicine, and antibacterial drugs (Özkinali et al., 2017).

Yellow mustard (Sinapis alba) oil was known for its antimicrobial and antioxidant activity due to its high content of phenolic compounds such as sinapine (the highest content) and sinapic acid (negligible concentration) (Fahmi, 2016).

Insight of the previous facts, this study targeted an investigation of the prevalence of B. cereus in chicken meat products retailed in some Egyptian markets including luncheon, nuggets, burger and pane. Besides, examining the recovered isolates for the diarrheal toxin: haemolysin BL (hbl), and non-hemolytic enterotoxin (nhe), and the emetic toxin: cereulide toxin (ces). Furthermore, the antibiogram of the recovered isolates was screened. Lastly, the influence of the galangal and yellow mustard oils on B. cereus was investigated.

Material and Methods:

Sample preparation:

  1. Collection of samples

Two hundreds of chicken meat product samples including luncheon, nuggets, burger, and pane (n = 50 per each product) were randomly collected from Egyptian local markets. The collected samples were transferred cooled directly to the Food Hygiene Department of the Animal Health Research Institute, Mansoura Branch, where they were tested for isolation and identification of B. cereus.

  1. Isolation and identification of Bacillus cereus:

Using peptone water as enrichment and Polymyxin-pyrovate-Egg yolk-Mannitol-Bromothymol blue Agar base (PEMBA) with Polymyxin B and Egg yolk supplement (Oxoid) as a selective media, Bacillus cereus was isolated in accordance with APHA (2001) and Tallent et al. (2012). Biochemical testing was done on the isolates according to Markey et al. (2013).

  1. Genotypic detection of some virulence genes in Bacillus cereus using polymerase chain reaction (PCR):

The virulence genes of 10 selected recovered B. cereus isolates were screened using PCR. For the purpose of genotyping the virulence genes of the ten recovered B. cereus strains, three sets of primers were employed (Table 1). Haemolysin BL (hbl), non-hemolytic enterotoxin (nhe), and cereulide toxin (ces) were the genes associated with diarrheal and emesis toxins, respectively. Using the QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (Catalogue no. 51304), the Emerald Amp GT PCR master mix (Takara, Japan) with Code No. RR310A, and 1.5% agarose gel electrophoreses (Sambrook et al., 1989), DNA was extracted from the chosen isolates.

Table (1): Oligonucleotide primers sequences:

Primer

Sequence

Amplified product

Reference

hbl

F- GTA AAT TAI GAT GAI CAA TTTC

R- AGA ATA GGC ATT CAT AGA TT

1091  bp

Ehling-Schulz et al., 2006

nhe

F- AAG CIG CTC TTC GIA TTC

R-ITI GTT GAA ATA AGC TGT GG

766 bp

ces

F- GGTGACACATTATCATATAAGGTG

R-GTAAGCGAACCTGTCTGTAACAACA

1271 bp

                                                                              

  1. Antibiotic Resistance of B. cereus (Antibiogram):

        Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by the single diffusion method according to CLSI guidelines (Wayne, 2013). Sensitivity discs with variable concentrations were used to determine the susceptibility of the isolated bacterial strains (Oxoid Limited, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK).                   

       Agar plate method was applied by using nutrient agar as a substrate for growth of the tested bacterium for its antibiotic sensitivity. The bacterial culture was uniformly spread on the surface of nutrient agar. Then the antibiotic discs were placed over the surface of inoculated plate. Moreover, the plate was then incubated at suitable temperature (25°C) for 2-7 days and checked for the growth of the bacterium around the antibiotic discs.

      The tested strains were evaluated as susceptible, intermediate and resistant. Multiple Antibiotic Resistance (MAR) index for each strain was determined according to the formula stipulated by Singh et al. (2010) as follow:                                                                                                                 MAR index= No. of resistance (Isolates classified as intermediate were         considered sensitive for MAR index) / Total No. of tested antibiotics

Anti-B. cereus activity of galangal and yellow mustard oils:

Galangal and yellow mustard oils were tested for their ability to inhibit the growth of B. cereus. The oils were utilized at two different concentrations, specifically 1% and 2% in corn oil. Such concentrations were reported to have no alteration on the sensory attributed of different food subjects (Nguyen, 2020).

Twenty-five cubes of pane samples free from B. cereus, each weighing 50 g, were partitioned into five groups, with each group including 5 cubes. The cubes were inoculated with B. cereus (recovered from the current study) at a concentration of 6 log cfu/g. All examined samples were submerged in corn oil (has no antibacterial activity) for 30 minutes and samples were assigned as follow: Group 1 was set as a control group. Group 2 was submerged in 1% galangal for 30 minutes. Group 3 was submerged in 2% galangal. Group 4 was submerged in 1% yellow mustard in corn oil for 30 minutes. Group 5 was submerged in 2% yellow mustard. Subsequently, the enumeration of B. cereus was performed on Tryptic Soya Agar (TSA, Oxoid). The sensory attributes and rates of decline were assessed based on the methodology outlined by Bourdoux et al. (2018).

Statistical analysis:

The statistical analysis was done using the SPSS-21 software, a statistical package for social sciences, based in Chicago, IL, USA. The Duncan Multiple Range test was used to analyze the differences among individual groups. A significant level of 95% confidence was applied, with P<0.05 deemed as statistically significant as (Feldman et al., 2003).

Results

The obtained results of the current study revealed isolation of B. cereus from the examined samples at 40%, 32%, 20%, and 12% from the examined chicken burger, pane, nuggets, and luncheon, respectively (Fig. 1).

 

Fig. 1: Prevalence rate (%) of B. cereus in the examined chicken meat products.

The obtained results in Fig. 2 revealed detection of the hbl and nhe-coding genes responsible for diarrhea in all screened isolates, while ces-coding gene responsible for vomiting was detected in 8 out of 10 examined isolates.

 

Fig. 2: Detection of hbl, nhe, and ces coding genes in the recovered B. cereus isolates

 

In this study, antimicrobial resistance was screened for the recovered B. cereus as seen in Tables 2, and 3. Multidrug resistance was very apparent in the current study. The screened isolates of B. cereus showed the highest resistance to nalidixic acid (100%) and cephalothin, and Sulphamethoxazol at 80% for both, while the lowest resistance was shown towards Daptomycin at 10%, with an average MAR index of 0.431.

Table 2: Antimicrobial susceptibility of B. cereus (n=10).

 

Antimicrobial agent

 

S

I

R

NO

%

NO

%

NO

%

Nalidixic acid (NA)

-

-

-

-

10

100

Cephalothin (CN)

-

 

2

20

8

80

Sulphamethoxazol (SXT)

1

10

1

10

8

80

Ampicillin (AM)

3

30

1

10

6

60

Tobramycin (TO)

3

30

2

20

5

50

Penicillin G (PG)

4

40

1

10

5

50

Gentamicin (G)

4

40

2

20

4

40

Amikacin (AK)

6

60

-

-

4

40

Piperacillin(P)

4

40

3

30

3

30

Aztreonam (AT)

5

50

2

20

3

30

Ciprofloxacin (CP)

5

50

2

20

3

30

Azithromycin (AZ)

6

60

1

10

3

30

Imipenem (IPM)

6

60

2

20

2

20

Vancomycin (V)

7

70

1

10

2

20

Linezolid (LZ)

8

80

-

-

2

20

Daptomycin (DA)

9

90

-

-

1

10

 

Table 3: Antimicrobial resistance profile of B. cereus (n=10).

NO

Antimicrobial resistance profile

MAR index

1

NA, CN, SXT, AM, TO, PG, G, AK, P, AT, CP, AZ, IPM, V, LZ, DA

1

2

NA, CN, SXT, AM, TO, PG, G, AK, P, AT, CP, AZ, IPM, V, LZ

0.937

3

NA, CN, SXT, AM, TO, PG, G, AK, P, AT, CP, AZ

0.750

4

NA, CN, SXT, AM, TO, PG, G, AK

0.500

5

NA, CN, SXT, AM, TO, PG

0.375

6

NA, CN, SXT, AM

0.250

7

NA, CN, SXT

0.188

8

NA, CN, SXT

0.188

9

NA

0.062

10

NA

0.062

      

Average = 0.431

 

         

AM: Ampicillin           V: Vancomycin                  PG: Penicillin G       

CN: Cephalothin       DA: Daptomycin               SXT: Sulphamethoxazol   

AZ: Azithromycin   NA: Nalidixic acid   AK: Amikacin      CP:Ciprofloxacin          G: Gentamicin                  LZ: Linezolid          TO: Tobramycin         P: Piperacillin                     AT: Aztreonam      IMP: Imipenem                                                                                           

Both galangal and yellow mustard oils showed a pronounced and potent anti-B. cereus effects in the protection testing, according to the current investigation. 1% and 2% galangal oil, respectively, decreased B. cereus at 11.65% and 33.33%, respectively. Similarly, B. cereus was lowered by 1% and 2% of yellow mustard oil, respectively, at 8.71% and 18.31% (Table 4, Fig. 3). The samples under examination retained their sensory qualities after using the oils (Nadarajah et al., 2005; Tomar and Shrivastava, 2014). Similarly, galangal oil was effective in the inhibition of B. subtilis and E. coli in an in vitro approach (Rini et al., 2018).

Table 4. B. cereus counts (log 10 cfu/g) and reduction percentages after treatment with galangal and yellow mustard oils

 

Min

Max

Mean

Reduction %

Control

5.9

6.17

6

0

Galangal 1%

5.17

5.6

5.3

11.65

Galangal 2%

3.69

4.3

4

33.33

Yellow Mustard1%

5

5.69

5.47

8.71

Yellow Mustard 2%

4

4.47

4.3

28.31

 

 

Fig. 3: Anti-B. cereus activities of galangal and yellow mustard oils

 

Discussion

Products made from chicken meat may become contaminated at any stage of the processing, packing, and shipping process with various pathogens. The chicken products become hazardous to customers and inappropriate for human consumption due to these pathogens.

The obtained results of the current study revealed isolation of B. cereus from the examined samples at 40%, 32%, 20%, and 12% from the examined chicken burger, pane, nuggets, and luncheon, respectively (Fig. 1). In agreement with our findings, Smith et al. (2004) isolated B. cereus from chicken meat products including nuggets, fillets, and chicken parts retailed in USA at 45%.

Hospitalizations due to B. cereus are commonplace worldwide. Fever, diarrhea, stomach pain, vomiting and dehydration are signs of B. cereus infection (Suthar et al., 2022). The obtained results in Fig. 2 revealed detection of the hbl and nhe-coding genes responsible for diarrhea in all screened isolates, while ces-coding gene responsible for vomiting was detected in 8 out of 10 examined isolates. Likely, Smith et al. (2004) detected hbl, ces, and nhe in the recovered B. cereus isolates from chicken meat products.

Antibiotic abusage is causing B. cereus to become more resistant to drugs over time, and different regions are seeing distinct pandemic trends. Previous reports (Alsayeqh et al., 2021) have indicated that antibiotic-resistant B. cereus has been linked to outbreaks of foodborne disease, particularly multidrug-resistant (MDR) B. cereus, which present a threat to public health security (Darwish et al., 2013).

In this study, antimicrobial resistance was screened for the recovered B. cereus as seen in Tables 2, and 3. Multidrug resistance was very apparent in the current study. The screened isolates of B. cereus showed the highest resistance to nalidixic acid (100%) and cephalothin, and Sulphamethoxazol at 80% for both, while the lowest resistance was shown towards Daptomycin at 10%, with an average MAR index of 0.431. These results agree with previous reports that studied the antimicrobial resistance of B. cereus (Alsayeqh et al., 2021). Multidrug resistant forms of bacteria are becoming more frequently as a result of the widespread use of antibiotics in recent decades, posing serious risks to public health. B. cereus is able to quickly develop resistance to almost all antibiotics due to its ability to adapt to its surroundings. In agreement with the obtained results of the present study, Suthar et al. (2022) reported that B. cereus isolates recovered from raw chicken meat samples showed multidrug resistance towards Penicillin G, Ampicillin, Trimethoprim, Cefotaxime and Ceftazidime followed by Clindamycin.

Both galangal and yellow mustard oils showed a pronounced and potent anti-B. cereus effects in the protection testing, according to the current investigation. 1% and 2% galangal oil, respectively, decreased B. cereus at 11.65% and 33.33%, respectively. Similarly, B. cereus was lowered by 1% and 2% of yellow mustard oil, respectively, at 8.71% and 18.31% (Table 4, Fig. 3). In agreement with the obtained results of the present study, yellow mustard oil at 1.5% and 2% could reduce other bacterial species such as E. coli and S. aureus contamination of meat and reduced the natural flora to undetectable levels (Abu Zaid et al., 2018). The antimicrobial activities of mustard oil also agree with previous reports and were attributed to its richness of phenolic compounds such as flavonoids, carotenoids, and alkaloids. The samples under examination retained their sensory qualities after using the oils (Nadarajah et al., 2005; Tomar and Shrivastava, 2014). Similarly, galangal oil was effective in the inhibition of B. subtilis and E. coli in an in vitro approach (Rini et al., 2018). Likely, galangal oil showed antimicrobial activity in vitro against B. cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella Typhimurium (Budiati et al., 2018).

Conclusion:

The findings of this study demonstrated that improper sanitation practices during the handling of chicken meat products resulted in the contamination of those items with B. cereus. As a result, stringent sanitation regulations must be adhered to when processing chicken meat products. Using 2% galangal and/or yellow mustard oils is highly recommended in order to lower the B. cereus load that contaminates chicken meat products.

Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Abu Zaid, A.A.; Hassan, N.S. and Hashem, A. (2018): Evaluation of mustard seed properties and the antibacterial potential in meat preparation. Egypt. J. Nutr. Health, 13(1), 59-72.
Alsayeqh, A.F.; Baz, A.H.A. and Darwish, W.S. (2021): Antimicrobial-resistant foodborne pathogens in the Middle East: A systematic review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28(48), 68111-68133.
Aman, I.M.; Abbas, E. and Elkassas, W. (2016): Safety of infant milk powder sold at Kafrelsheikh governorate markets, Egypt. Res.  Rev. J. Vet. Sci., 2, 2347-3207.
American Public Health Association (APHA) (2001): Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological examination of Foods. 4th edition.  APHA. Washington D.C., USA.
Bourdoux, S.; Rajkovic, A.; De Sutter, S.; Vermeulen, A.; Spilimbergo, S.; Zambon, A.; Hofland, G.; Uyttendaele, M. and Devlieghere, F. (2018): Inactivation of Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli O157: H7 inoculated on coriander by freeze-drying and supercritical CO2 drying. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol., 47, 180-186.
Budiati, T.; Suryaningsih, W.; Umaroh, S.; Poerwanto, B.; Bakri, A. and Kurniawati, E. (2018): December. Antimicrobial activity of essential oil from Indonesian medicinal plants against food-borne pathogens. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 207, 012036.
Darwish, W.S.; Eldaly, E.A.; El-Abbasy, M.T.; Ikenaka, Y.; Nakayama, S. and Ishizuka, M. (2013): Antibiotic residues in food: the African scenario. Jpn. J. Vet. Res., 61, S13-S22.
Ehling-Schulz, M.; Guinebretiere, M.H.; Monthán, A.; Berge, O.; Fricker, M. and Svensson, B. (2006): Toxin gene profiling of enterotoxic and emetic Bacillus cereus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 260, 232-240.
El-Bayom, R.M.; Darwish, W.S.; Elshahat, S.S. and Hafez, A.E. (2018): Human health risk assessment of heavy metals and trace elements residues in poultry meat retailed in Sharkia governorate, Egypt. Slov. Vet. Res., 55, 211-219.
Fahmi, R. (2016): Antioxidant and antibacterial properties of endogenous phenolic compounds from commercial mustard products (Master's thesis), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Feldman, D.; Ganon, J.; Haffman, R. and Simpson, J. (2003): The solution for data analysis and presentation graphics. 2nd Ed., Abacus Lancripts, Inc., Berkeley, USA.
JeBberger, N.; Dietrich, R.; Bock, S.; Didier, A. and Märtlbauer, E. (2014): Bacillus cereus enterotoxins act as major virulence factors and exhibit distinct cytotoxicity to different human cell lines. Toxicon, 77, 49-57.
Liu, Y.; Lai, Q.; Göker, M.; Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Wang, M.; Sun, Y.; Wang, L. and Shao, Z. (2015): Genomic insights into the taxonomic status of the Bacillus cereus group. Sci. Rep., 5, 14082.
Markey, B.K.,; Leonard, F.C.; Archambault, M.; Cullinane, A. and Maguire, D. (2013): Clinical Veterinary Microbiology, Second edition. MOSBY. Elsevier Ltd. Edinburgh London New York Oxford Philadelphia St Louis Sydney Toronto.
Morshdy, A.E.M.; Morsy, D.M.; Mahmoud, A.F. and Darwish, W. (2024): Antimicrobial activities of coriander in chicken meat products: A review. J. Adv. Vet. Res., 14(2), 326-329.
Nadarajah, D. Han, J.H. and Holley, R.A. (2005): Use of mustard flour to inactivate Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef under nitrogen flushed packing. Inter. J. Food Microb., 99, 257-267.
Nguyen, M.P. (2020): Synergistic Effect of Turmeric (Curcuma longa), Galanga (Alpinia galanga) Powder and Lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) Essential Oil as Natural Preservative in Chilled Storage of White Hard Clam (Meretrix lyrata). Oriental J. Chem., 36(1), 195.
Özkinali, S.; Şener, N.; Gür, M.; Güney, K. and Olgun, Ç. (2017): Antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of coriander & galangal essential oil. Ind. J. Pharm. Edu. Res., 51(3), 221-224.
Rahnama, H.; Azari, R.; Yousefi, M.H.; Berizi, E.; Mazloomi, S.M.; Hosseinzadeh, S.; Derakhshan, Z.; Ferrante, M. and Conti, G.O. (2023): A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of Bacillus cereus in foods. Food Control, 143, 109250.
Rini, C.S.; Rohmah, J. and Widyaningrum, L.Y. (2018): September. The antibacterial activity test galanga (Alpinia galangal) on the growth of becteria Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 420, No. 1, p. 012142). IOP Publishing.
Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.R. and Maniatis, T. (1989): Molecular coloning. A laboratory manual (2nd ed.). Cold spring Harbor Laboratotry press, New York.
Singh, A.; Yadav, S.; Singh S. and Bharti, P. (2010): Prevalence of Salmonella in chicken eggs collected from poultry farms and marketing channels and their antimicrobial resistance. Food Res. Inter., 43, 2027- 2030
Smith, D.P.; Berrang, M.E.; Feldner, P.W.; Phillips, R.W. and Meinersmann, R.J. (2004): Detection of Bacillus cereus on selected retail chicken products. J. Food Prot., 67(8), 1770-1773.
Suthar, A.P.; Kumar, R.; Savalia, C.V.; Nayak, D.N. and Kalyani, I.H. (2022): Determination of Prevalence and Multidrug Resistance Pheno types of Bacillus cereus in Raw Chicken Meat and Swabs of Human Subjects. Pharm. Innov., 11(12), 1159-1164.
Tallent, S.M.; Kotewicz, K.M.; Strain, E.A. and Bennett, R.W. (2012): Efficient isolation and identification of Bacillus cereus group. J. AOAC Inter., 95, 446-451.
Tomar, R.S. and Shrivastava, V. (2014): Efficacy evaluation of ethanolic extract of Brassica nig potential antimicrobial agent against selected microorganisms. Inter. J. Pharm. Sci. Health Care, 4, 3.
Wayne, P. (2013): Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. CLSI approved standard M100–S23. Clin. Lab. Stand. Inst., 33, 118-156.