Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of Eucalyptus extract in-ovo inoculation on post hatch Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in broiler chickens

Document Type : Original researches

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is considered as an important pathogen that threatens poultry industry resulting in severe economic losses. The ability of this pathogen to form biofilm and resistance to the antimicrobial agents represents a very great danger that produces treatment difficulties. So that, this study was conducted to isolate P. aeruginosa from 100 diseased broiler chickens farms in Dakahlia Governorate and studied the in vitro and in vivo antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of Eucalyptus extract on P. aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa were isolated from 100 diseased broiler chickens farms in Dakahlia Governorate with a percentage of (12%) and it showed higher resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanic (91.7%), ampicillin/sulbactam (83.3%), doxycycline and erythromycin (75% for each). Eight P. aeruginosa isolates were strong biofilm producers (8/12, 66.7%) and 4 isolates (4/12, 33.3%) were moderate. The in vitro antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of Eucalyptus extract on the isolated P. aeruginosa showed the higher activities of 50, 75 and 100 mg/ 1ml concentrations than 40 mg/ 1ml. The in vivo studies in experiment (1) showed (100%) hatchability with no embryonic mortalities in the inoculated groups with the Eucalyptus extract. In experiment (2), the study showed that inoculating group 5 with a 100 mg/ml concentration of Eucalyptus extract in-ovo had beneficial effects. It prevented deaths, lessened clinical symptoms, enhanced growth performance, and reduced P. aeruginosa colonization in internal organs compared to group 3 (inoculated with 50 mg/ml) and group 4 (inoculated with 75 mg/ml).
The expression of pslA gene (responsible for biofilm formation) was examined using RT- PCR and the results showed significant down regulation (decrease in the expression or activity of a gene) in the examined liver of chicks in group (5) in comparison with other groups. The obtained results suggested that application of Eucalyptus extract in-ovo inoculation is an alternative natural approach to control P. aeruginosa characterized by multidrug resistance and biofilm formation in broiler farms.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of Eucalyptus extract in-ovo inoculation on post hatch Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in broiler chickens

Heba, M. Hassan1, Nehal, M.Nabil1, Maram, M. Tawakol1, Ghada, S. AbdEl Hamed1 and Wessam Youssef 1

  • Animal Health Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Nadi El-Seid Street, Dokki, Giza 12618, Egypt.

 

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is considered as an important pathogen that threatens poultry industry resulting in severe economic losses. The ability of this pathogen to form biofilm and resistance to the antimicrobial agents represents a very great danger that produces treatment difficulties. So that, this study was conducted to isolate P. aeruginosa from 100 diseased broiler chickens farms in Dakahlia Governorate and studied the in vitro and in vivo antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of Eucalyptus extract on P. aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa were isolated from 100 diseased broiler chickens farms in Dakahlia Governorate with a percentage of (12%) and it showed higher resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanic (91.7%), ampicillin/sulbactam (83.3%), doxycycline and erythromycin (75% for each). Eight P. aeruginosa isolates were strong biofilm producers (8/12, 66.7%) and 4 isolates (4/12, 33.3%) were moderate. The in vitro antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of Eucalyptus extract on the isolated P. aeruginosa showed the higher activities of 50, 75 and 100 mg/ 1ml concentrations than 40 mg/ 1ml. The in vivo studies in experiment (1) showed (100%) hatchability with no embryonic mortalities in the inoculated groups with the Eucalyptus extract. In experiment (2), the study showed that inoculating group 5 with a 100 mg/ml concentration of Eucalyptus extract in-ovo had beneficial effects. It prevented deaths, lessened clinical symptoms, enhanced growth performance, and reduced P. aeruginosa colonization in internal organs compared to group 3 (inoculated with 50 mg/ml) and group 4 (inoculated with 75 mg/ml).

The expression of pslA gene (responsible for biofilm formation) was examined using RT- PCR and the results showed significant down regulation (decrease in the expression or activity of a gene) in the examined liver of chicks in group (5) in comparison with other groups. The obtained results suggested that application of Eucalyptus extract in-ovo inoculation is an alternative natural approach to control P. aeruginosa characterized by multidrug resistance and biofilm formation in broiler farms.

Key wards: Eucalyptus, in-ovo inoculation, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, broiler chickens

Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is an opportunistic pathogen infecting human being and animals (Badr et al., 2016& Farghaly et al., 2017& Yong et al., 2020). It is a Gram negative, non-capsulated, non-spore forming (Shukla and Mishra, 2015), motile rod shaped bacterium and usually produces water soluble green pigment with a fruity smell (fluorescent and pyocyanin) (Kebede, 2010).

  1. aeruginosa is of zoonotic importance which threatens the poultry industry resulting in economic losses (El-demerdash, et al., 2020& Abd El-Ghany, 2021& Marouf et al., 2023) due to the higher morbidity and mortality rates in chickens (El-demerdash, et al., 2020) in addition to the rapid spreading of infection between poultry flocks causing mortalities in all ages (Shukla and Mishra, 2015) and the difficulties in treatment of antibiotic resistant strains (Abd El-Ghany, 2021). P. aeruginosa is highly virulent in the young chicks (1 - 10 days) and less pathogenic at 11 - 20 days old but the older chickens (>20 days) have been found to resist the infection (Kebede, 2010). The pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa may resulted from the existence of virulence regulators and antimicrobial resistance genes (Farghaly et al., 2017) and has the ability to infect the host via wound and/or respiratory route (Kebede, 2010) and incase of lower immunity (Samanta et al., 2012). Poultry litters can also play a role in spreading the antimicrobial resistant P. aeruginosa in the environments (Farghaly et al., 2017).
  2. aeruginosa considered as an important bacterial disease infecting poultry particularly eggs and newly hatched chicks (Yong et al., 2020). Infected chicks showed symptoms of enteric and respiratory infections, septicemia and higher mortalities but the infected embryos showed death in the egg shell (Kebede, 2010& Abd El-Ghany, 2021). Shukla and Mishra, (2015) explained the symptoms of P. aeruginosa infection in chicks at 4 days old in form of drooping wings, ruffled feather and diarrhea. The in vivo experimental infections conducted by Marouf et al., (2023) with multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa revealed severe pathogenicity in oral and subcutaneous challenged birds with 40% and 100% mortalities respectively.

 Biofilms are communities of bacteria that attach to a surface and embed into an extracellular matrix that supports the stability, defense and nutrition of the bacteria (Wilson et al., 2017). One of the most common bacteria producing biofilm is P. aeruginosa (Vallet et al., 2001& Zhang et al., 2013) which persists in some tissues and forms biofilm structure via a series of cellular interactions and adhesion to surfaces (Vallet et al., 2001). The extracellular matrix of biofilm is composed of exopolysaccharides, nucleic acids, proteins and lipid vesicles. The main components of this matrix are three exopolysaccharides (pel, psl and alginate) which protect the bacterial cell from the actions of the antimicrobial agents and immune responses (AL-Sheikhly et al., 2020). In P. aeruginosa infections, biofilms considered as one of the bacterial virulence factors which give protection against antibiotics and host immunity (Al-Wrafy et al., 2017& AL-Sheikhly et al., 2020). Overhage et al., (2005) identified psl gene cluster (15 cotranscribed genes) which involved in the biosynthesis of the exopolysaccharide and formation of biofilm in P. aeruginosa isolates.

Eucalyptus has become one of the most planted species in the world. Eucalyptus camaldulensis (The River Red Gum) is a plantation species in many parts of the world. It has significant antimicrobial properties against many Gram negative and positive bacteria (Sabo and Knezevic, 2019). In Egypt, the Eucalyptus camaldulensis is a well-known plant tree (Elhariri et al., 2016) and considered as a medicinal herb with antimicrobial and antioxidant properties which improves growth performance and health of broiler chickens (Mashayekhi et al., 2018). Some researchers such as Kamel et al., (2011) & Bachheti et al., (2011) and Pereira et al., (2014) explained the antibacterial properties of Eucalyptus against P. aeruginosa pathogen. The Eucalyptus leaves extract considered as a potential alternative approach with significant ability in preventing biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa (Kaur et al., 2018).

Material and methods

Samples collection and bacteriological identifications

One hundred diseased broiler chickens (aged 25- 37 days) from 10 farms (10 birds/ farm) in Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt were collected in this study. The examined birds were subjected to clinical and postmortem (PM) examinations whereas the observed clinical signs and lesions were recorded. The diseased birds were suffered from ruffled feather, respiratory distress, diarrhea in some cases and mortality (30%). The PM lesions showed septicemia, congested internal organs, perihepatitis, pericarditis, pneumonia and enteritis.

Samples from internal organs such as liver, heart, lungs, spleen and intestine were collected from each bird aseptically conditions to avoid cross contamination then labeled and transported to the Reference laboratory for veterinary quality control on poultry production (RLQP) to complete further examinations.

     The collected internal organs from each bird individually were pooled as one sample. The collected samples were inoculated in buffered peptone water (BPW) then incubated at 37°C for 24 hours in aerobic conditions. The inoculated broth was streaked onto Pseudomonas selective agar (HiMedia) supplemented with glycerol agar, Trypticase soya agar and MacConkey agar and incubated at 37°C for 24-48 hours. Lactose fermentation and pigment production were checked in the agar plates. The suspected colonies were subjected to Gram staining and biochemical identifications (Quinn et al., 2002).

Antimicrobial sensitivity pattern

 The antimicrobial sensitivity of isolated P. aeruginosa strains were examined using disc diffusion methods against 9 antimicrobial agents (Oxoid) belonged to 7 classes that commonly used in broiler farms; Aminoglycosides: streptomycin (10 µg, S), Macrolides: erythromycin (15 µg, E), Tetracyclines: doxycycline (30 µg, DO) and oxytetracycline (30 µg, OT), Amphotericols: florfenicol (30 µg, FF), Polypeptides: colistin sulphate (10 µg, CT), B-Lactam : amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 µg, AMC), ampicillin/sulbactam (SAM; 20 µg) and quinolones: norfloxacin (10 µg, NOR). The diameters of the obtained inhibition zone diameters were measured and categorized into sensitive or resistant according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2020). P. aeruginosa isolates that exhibited resistance to one antimicrobial agent in three or more classes were considered as multidrug resistant (MDR). Multidrug resistance index (MARI) was recorded (Number of antimicrobial agent showed resistance / Total number of the tested antimicrobial agents).

Detection of biofilm formation

   According to Christensen et al., (1982), qualitative technique (tube method) was used for the detection of biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa isolates (n= 12). Loops of P. aeruginosa culture were inoculated in sterile tubes containing 10 mL of trypticase soy broth. The inoculated tubes were incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C. The inoculated broth was decanted and the tubes were washed in buffered saline (pH 7.3) and dried. The dried tubes were stained with crystal violet (0.1%) then deionized water was used to remove any remaining stain. The tubes were dried at upside down position. Tube system scoring was performed based on the performance of P. aeruginosa control strains (supplied from Tawakol et al., 2018) the presence of transparent film on the tubes wall and bottom indicated the biofilm formation. It was rated 1, weak/none; 2, moderate, or 3, high/ strong (experiments were conducted in triplicate).

Antibacterial activity of Eucalyptus extract against P. aeruginosa

Eucalyptus plant extraction: Fresh leaves of Eucalyptus camaldulensis plant was collected from Dakahlia Governorate in September 2023.  According to Ammer et al., (2016), the leaves were washed under tap water and dried for 2 days at room temperature. The dried leaves were crushed into powder and 50 gram was added in flask and mixed with 200 ml methanol then heated for 1 hour on boiling water bath. The mixture was kept for 5 days at room temperature. The extract was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 5000 rpm and the clear were allowed to evaporate the solvent in hot water bath to obtain dried methanol free extract. The extract was diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for yielding different concentrations of 40, 50, 75 and 100 mg/ 1ml PBS (the lowest concentration 40 mg/ml and the highest concentration 100mg/ml were selected according to the study performed by Kamel et al., (2011) on the antibacterial activities of these Eucalyptus extract concentration on P. aeruginosa isolated from poultry.

Antibacterial assay: The antibacterial activity of Eucalyptus extract was evaluated using agar disc diffusion methods against 18 P. aeruginosa isolates recorded in this study. Four concentrations of the prepared extract were used: 40, 50, 75 and 100 mg/ 1ml. According to Ammer et al., (2016), a loop-full of the tested bacterial culture was inoculated into nutrient broth and incubated for 24 hours at 37 oC. The turbidity of the bacterial suspension was adjusted at a range of 1x108 bacterial cells/ml using McFarland standard and 100 µl of the prepared suspension was spread onto Mueller Hinton agar plates. Filter paper discs (diameter: 6 mm) were soaked with 15 ml of each extract concentration and evenly distributed in the Mueller Hinton agar plates. The agar plates were incubated aerobically for 16-18 hours at 37 oC. After incubation the agar plates were examined for the presence of inhibition zones (mm). The experiments were performed in triplicates.

In vitro anti-biofilm activity of Eucalyptus extract

As previously mentioned for the detection of biofilm by tube method. The presence of transparent film on the tubes wall and bottom were examined and scored as previously mentioned by Christensen et al., (1982): 1, weak/none; 2, moderate, or 3, high/ strong (experiments were conducted in triplicate).

In ovo-inoculations of Eucalyptus extract in SPF embryonated chicken eggs

 The role of Eucalyptus extract in controlling of P. aeruginosa post hatching was studied. Experiment (1) design: 75 Specific pathogen-free (SPF) embryonated chicken eggs were obtained from a breeder (Ross broiler breeder flock, age 38 weeks) which was free from P. aeruginosa and not vaccinated. The eggs were weighed and divided into 5 groups (15 eggs/ group) and the eggs with similar average egg of weights were placed in the same group. All eggs were incubated under standard conditions (37.5 °C and 54% relative humidity) (De Oliveira et al., 2014& Nabil et al., 2023). The eggs were candled and the viability of embryos was checked all over the incubation period. Three effective Eucalyptus extract concentrations (50, 75 and 100 mg/ 1ml) which produced antibacterial activities against P. aeruginosa were used in the inoculation process. At the 17th day of incubation, the eggs were disinfected outside the incubator with alcohol (70%) and the inoculation process was conducted as follows: control group non inoculated (1) and (2) inoculated in the yolk sac with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), group (3) was inoculated in the yolk sac with a Eucalyptus extract (50 mg/ 1ml for each kg of eggs), group (4) inoculated in the yolk sac with a Eucalyptus extract 75 mg/ 1ml for each kg of eggs) and group (5) was inoculated in the yolk sac with a Eucalyptus extract (100 mg/ 1ml for each kg of eggs). Each egg in groups 3, 4 and 5 was inoculated with 70µl of the extract using pipette attached to a needle (23- ga). After the inoculation process the eggs were sealed with paraffin and returned to the incubator again. The eggs were examined to determine the hatchability at 21th days (number of hatched chicks/ number of the inoculated eggs per group) and embryonic mortalities.

Experiment (2): After hatching at 21th days the effects of the Eucalyptus extract inoculation in embryonated chicken eggs were studied in the hatched chicks which challenged with P. aeruginosa (selected from the current study). Fifty hatched chicks were selected from the previous groups (10 chicks from each group) (groups kept their previous numbers as previously mentioned). The experiments were performed in animal facility (BSL2 +). The chicks in all groups were supplied with starter ration (protein 23%) and drinking water ad-libitum. Groups (2), (3), (4) and (5) challenged by subcutaneous route at the 3rd day of age with 0.1ml the bacterial suspension containing 10⁷ CFU/ml  multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa in brain heart infusion broth (Bakheet and Torra, 2020). Group (1) control negative and group (2) control positive (challenged with P. aeruginosa). The experimental chicks were fed with broiler starter and supplied with water ad-libitum. Clinical signs and mortalities were recorded daily and any dead chicks were subjected to post-mortem (PM) examination. At the end of the experiment (10th day of age, 7th day post P. aeruginosa challenge) (7th dpc) growth performance parameters; body weight (BW) feed conversion ratio (FCR), feed intake (FI), and body weight gain (BWG) were determined. Chicks were killed by cervical dislocation at the end of the experimental period. Samples from liver, lung, heart and spleen were collected aseptically from each chick and subjected to P. aeruginosa isolation and counting (CFU/ gm) as follow; the tissue sample was weighed and homogenized in sterile NaCl solution (0.9%). One ml from the prepared homogenate was transferred into a tube containing 9 ml of sterile BPW and tenfold serial dilution was performed.  A total of 0.1 ml from each dilution was plated into Pseudomonas selective agar and incubated for 48 hours at 37°C. The obtained greenish yellow colonies were counted (ISO, 2004).

Gene expression assay was used on the collected liver from the experimental chicks to evaluate the activity of the Eucalyptus extract. The samples were subjected to RNA extraction from liver tissues using QIAampRNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany, GmbH): 30 mg of the sample was added to a volume of 600 µl RLT buffer containing 10 μl β-mercaptoethanol per 1 ml. The samples homogenization was performed by placing the tubes into adaptor sets that were fixed into the clamps of the QiagentissueLyser. The disruption was conducted in 2 minutes high-speed (30 Hz) shaking step. One volume of ethanol (70%) was added to the cleared lysate then the steps were completed according to the Purification of Total RNA from Animal Tissues protocol of the QIAampRNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany, GmbH). On column DNase digestion was done to remove residual DNA.The used oligonucleotide Primers used were obtained from Metabion (Germany).

SYBR green rt-PCR: the primers were used in a 25- µl reaction which contain 12.5 µl of 2x QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Qiagen, Germany, GmbH), 0.25 µl RevertAid Reverse Transcriptase (200 U/µL) (Thermo Fisher), 0.5 µl from each primer of 20 pmol concentration, 8.25 µl water, and 3 µl RNA template. The reaction was conducted in a Stratagene MX3005P real time PCR instrument.

The results of SYBR green rt-PCR results were analyzed as follow: the CT values and the amplification curves were detected using stratagene MX3005P software. To detect the variation of the gene expression on RNA of the different examined samples, the CT value of each sample was compared with that of the positive control group according to the "ΔΔCt” method recorded by Yuan et al., 2006 using the following ratio: (2-DDct).

 ΔΔCt = ΔCt reference – Δcttarget& ΔCt target = Ct control Ct treatment and ΔCt reference = Ct control- Ct treatment

Statistical analysis

 Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 29. One-Way ANOVA test was used to detect the significant differences between the experimental groups (P ˂ 0.05).

Table (1): SYBR green rt-PCR (primers sequences, target genes and cycling conditions)

 

Target gene

Primers sequences

Reverse transcript-ion

Primary

denaturation

Amplification (40 cycles)

Dissociation curve

(1 cycle)

Reference

Secondary denaturation

Annealing

(Optics on)

Extension

 Secondary  denaturation

Annealing

 

Final denatu-reation

Pseudomonas

 16S rRNA

GACGGGTGAGTAATGCCTA

 

50˚C

30 min.

94˚C

15 min.

 

 

94˚C

15 sec.

 

50˚C

30 sec.

 

72˚C

30 sec.

 

 

94˚C

1 min.

 

 

50˚C

1 min.

 

94˚C

1 min.

 

Spilker et al., 2004

CACTGGTGTTCCTTCCTATA

pslA

TCCCTACCTCAGCAGCAAGC

 

60˚C

30 sec.

 

60˚C

1 min.

 

Ghadaksaz et al., 2015

TGTTGTAGCCGTAGCGTTTCTG

 

 

 

 

 

Results

  1. aeruginosa isolation and identification

Bacteriologically, the characteristic P. aeruginosa colonies in this study showed irregular, large, translucent, fruity smell and greenish diffusible pigment on the agar plates. Gram staining revealed a Gram negative rod shaped bacteria. Indole, MR and VP tests were negative however gelatin hydrolysis and citrate utilization produced positive results.

From the bacteriological examinations, 12 P. aeruginosa isolates were recovered from 12% of tested 100 diseased broiler chickens collected from farms in Dakahlia Governorate.

Antimicrobial sensitivity pattern

The results in table, (2) showed high resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanic (91.7%) followed by ampicillin/sulbactam (83.3%), doxycycline and erythromycin (75% for each). Lower resistances were recorded to oxytetracycline and florfenicol (58.3% for each).

  The investigation of the antimicrobial resistant P. aeruginosa isolates showed that 11 out of 12 isolates (91.7%) showed multidrug resistant to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial classes. Twelve antimicrobial agent pattern profiles were recorded in the examined isolates with a multidrug resistant index which ranged from 0.22 to 1.

Table (2) Antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of P. aeruginosa (12 isolates)

 

NOR

DO

OT

AMC

SAM

S

E

FFC

CT

Resistant

8 (66.7%)

9 (75%)

7 (58.3%)

11 (91.7%)

10 (83.3%)

8 (66.7%)

9 (75%)

7 (58.3%)

8 (66.7%)

Susceptible

 

4 (33.3%)

3 (25%)

5 (41.7%)

1 (8.3%)

2 (16.7%)

4 (33.3%)

3 (25%)

5 (41.7%)

4 (33.3%)

Norfloxacin: NOR, doxycycline: DO, oxytetracycline: OT, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid: AMC, ampicillin/sulbactam: SAM, Streptomycin: S, eyrthromtcin; E, florfenicol: FFC and colistin sulphate: CT.

 

 

 

Table (3) P. aeruginosa antimicrobial resistant pattern profiles .

Antimicrobial agent pattern profiles

Antimicrobial agent

NO. of isolates

No. of resistance markers

MDRI

1

DO-AMC-SAM-S-E

1

5

0.56

2

NOR-DO- OT-AMC-SAM-E-FF-CT

1

8

0.89

3

NOR-DO- OT-AMC-SAM-FF-CT

1

7

0.78

4

NOR-DO-AMC-S-E-FF-CT

1

7

0.78

5

NOR-DO-AMXC-S-E-FF

1

6

0.67

6

NOR-DO-AMC-SAM-S-E-FF

1

7

0.78

7

OT-AMC-SAM-S-E-CT

1

6

0.67

8

SAM-S

1

2

0.22

9

NOR-DO- OT-AMC-SAM-S-E-FF-CT

1

9

1

10

OT-AMC-SAM-E-CT

1

5

0.56

11

NOR-DO-OT-AMC-SAM-S-E-CT

1

8

0.89

12

NOR-DO-OT-AMC-SAM-FF-CT

1

7

0.78

 

Biofilm formation

The obtained results showed that all isolates formed biofilm: 8 isolates (8/12, 66.7%) were strong producers, 4 isolates (4/12, 33.3%) were moderate.

Antibacterial activity of Eucalyptus extract against P. aeruginosa

The concentrations of 40 mg/ 1ml had antibacterial activity against 4 out of 12 examined isolates. However, the concentrations 50, 75 and 100 mg/ 1ml showed antibacterial activity against all P. aeruginosa isolates. The mean diameter of the inhibition zones  were 3±4.5   mm, 8.8±0.72 mm, 12.4±0.8  mm and 14.2±0.72mm for the concentrations 40, 50, 75 and 100 mg/ 1ml respectively .

In vitro anti-biofilm activity of Eucalyptus extract

the concentration of 40 mg/ 1ml, had the ability to inhibit the biofilm formation in 4 P. aeruginosa isolates while  concentrations 50, 75 and 100 mg/ 1ml showed anti-biofilm activity in all isolates.

In ovo-inoculations of Eucalyptus extract in SPF embryonated chicken eggs

Effects of Eucalyptus extract in-ovo inoculation on the embryonic mortalities and egg hatchability: on the first day of hatching, the hatchability was calculated and the results showed that the hatchability was (93.3%), (100%), (100%), (100%) and (100%) in groups (1), (2), (3), (4) and (5) respectively. The embryonic mortalities were recorded in group 1 (non- inoculated groups). The examination of dead embryo revealed the presence of sticky embryo to the eggs shell. The other groups showed no embryonic mortalities.

Evaluation of Eucalyptus extract in-ovo inoculation on post hatch P. aeruginosa infection in experimental chicks.

The health of the experimental chicks was monitored daily until the end of the 10-day experiment, which included a challenge with Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the 7th day. The negative control group showed no clinical signs. Chicks in (positive control) displayed signs of depression, ruffled feathers, respiratory distress, and diarrhea starting from the 2nd day post-challenge (dpc). Groups 3 and 4 exhibited mild clinical signs such as depression, ruffled feathers, and respiratory distress starting from the 3rd dpc and lasting throughout the experiment. In Group 5, slight signs of depression and respiratory distress appeared at 3 dpc, gradually disappearing thereafter. By the 6th and 7th dpc, chicks in Group 5 regained their vitality. No deaths were recorded in Groups 1, 3, 4, and 5. However, in Group 2, 50% mortality occurred within 4 dpc. Postmortem examinations revealed pneumonia, septicemia, unabsorbed yolk sac, and congested internal organs in Group 2 (positive control). Groups 3 and 4 also showed pneumonia and congested internal organs during postmortem examinations. Group 5 exhibited slight congestion in the lungs and liver of some chicks. No postmortem lesions were observed in Group 1.

 

 

  Figure (1) clinical signs and PM lesions of the experimental chicks  , Figure 1a & 1b show images of chicks displaying clinical signs such as depression, ruffled feathers, and respiratory distress.Figure c,  septicemia  Figure d , unabsorbed yolk sac, Figure e and f  exhibited slight congestion in the lungs and liver of some chicks

   

Growth performance parameters such as body weight (BW), body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were calculated at the end of experiment at (7th dpc) (table, 4).  Significant improvement of the growth performance parameters were recorded in group (5) when compared with other groups. No significant difference was recorded between groups (1) and (4). The parameters were significant higher in group (4) and (5) than group (3). Lower performance parameters were recorded in the positive control (group, 2) when compared with other groups.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table (4) mean values of body weight (BW), body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR) of the experimental chicks

       Parameters

Groups  

No.

Body weight

(BW)

(g)

body weight gain (BWG)

(g)

feed intake (FI)

(g)

feed conversion ratio (FCR)

Group 1

291.5±0.67b

250.8±0.74b

286.1±0.77ab

1.14±0.005c

Group 2

175.1±6.1d

134.5±6.13d

181.8±8.9a

1.36±0.045a

Group 3

271±0.3c

230.4±0.31c

294.9±1.03a

1.28±0.005b

Group 4

285.7±0.33b

244.9±0.41b

288.4±0.4ab

1.18±0.002c

Group 5

306.5±0.37a

265.2±0.68a

281.6±0.4b

1.06±0.002d

* Mean values mean ± SEM (mean± standard error). The Mean values expressed by different letters (a, b, c and d) showed the significant differences between the experimental groups at P< 0.05.

.

 

After the PM examination, the isolation of P. aeruginosa from the collected internal organs (liver, lung, heart and spleen, and intestine) showed on microbiological examination a Gram staining rod shaped bacteria with irregular, large, translucent colonies in addition to fruity smell and greenish diffusible pigment on the agar plates. Indole, MR and VP tests were negative however gelatin hydrolysis and citrate utilization produced positive results. No P. aeruginosa was detected in negative control group (1). The mean CFU of P. aeruginosa (log10 CFU/g) was detected in the liver, lung, spleen and heart samples and the results showed that P. aeruginosa was localized in the examined internal organs in group (2) (positive control) with 6.95, 6.6, 5.9 and 5.3 log10 CFU/g respectively. Lower colonization of P. aeruginosa was detected in group (4) than group (3). In group (5) the recorded colonization in the examined internal organs was lower than group (3) and (4). Group (5) showed colonization in liver, lung, spleen and heart samples with 1.3, 1.2, 1 and 1 log10 CFU/g respectively (table, 5).

 

 

Table (5) Mean of colonization (log10 CFU/g) P. aeruginosa in the internal organs of experimental chicks

Groups

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Group 4

Group 5

Liver

0

6.95

3.9

2.85

1.3

Lung

0

6.6

3.6

2.3

1.2

Spleen

0

5.9

2.78

1.9

1

Heart

0

5.3

2.95

1.48

1

 

The effects of Eucalyptus extract in-ovo inoculation on pslA gene expression which responsible for biofilm formation in the post hatch P. aeruginosa infection was examined by quantitative RT-PCR (figure, 2). The mean values of the fold change expression were compared to Group (2) whereas the transcription of pslA gene was significantly down regulated in the in-ovo inoculated groups (3), (4) and (5). However the gene transcription was significantly down regulated in group (5) when compared with group (3) and (4) (p<0.05) (table, 6).

Table (6) Mean fold change of pslA gene expression

Group no.

Group 2

Group 3

Group 4

Group 5

Mean fold change

1±0.0a

0.76±0.01b

0.64±0.02c

0.12±0.003d

      * Mean values expressed by mean± standard error. The Mean values expressed by different letters (a, b, c and d) showed the significant differences between the experimental groups at P< 0.05.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Figure (2) amplification plots of pslA gene expression using quantitative RT-PCR technique

 

Discussion

  1. aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen that causes serious problems in the chicken farms. It is one of the most important bacterial pathogens producing opportunistic infections in human. Poultry has been considered as a reservoir for antibiotic resistant bacteria, which may exacerbate the problem of pseudomonas infection (Badr et al., 2020). In the current study, P. aeruginosa was isolated from 100 diseased chickens collected from broiler farms in Dakahlia Governorate. The obtained results were nearly similar to Radwan et al., (2018) who isolated P. aeruginosa with a percentage of 10.4% from broiler chickens. Another research studies conducted by Badr et al., (2016) and Farghaly et al., (2017) identified lower P. aeruginosa incidence from chickens than recorded in the current study with percentages of 6.5% and 8.75% respectively. However higher incidences were reported by Hassan et al., (2020), El-demerdash et al., (2020), Badr et al., (2020) and Marouf et al., (2023) with percentages of 18%, 20%, 39.78% and 48.1% respectively.

The antimicrobial sensitivity of the isolated P. aeruginosa in this study showed higher resistances to amoxicillin/clavulanic, ampicillin/sulbactam, doxycycline and erythromycin with percentages (91.7%), (83.3%), (75%) and (75%) respectively. Meanwhile, low resistance was recorded with percentage of (58.3%) for oxytetracycline and florfenicol. The isolated P. aeruginosa exhibited multidrug resistance in 11 out of 12 isolates (91.7%) in addition to 12 antimicrobial agent pattern profiles. Our findings nearly agreed with El-demerdash et al., (2020) who reported resistance of P. aeruginosa to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and ampicillin. Another study conducted by Radwan et al., (2018) recorded resistance to amoxicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, doxycycline and florfenicol with percentages of (80%), (100%), (100%), (96%), (84%) and (80%) respectively. In contrast to our study, Ramatla et al., (2024) recorded resistance of P. aeruginosa isolated from broiler chicken to ampicillin (26%) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (4%) with (26%) and (4%) respectively and Abd El- Tawab et al., (2014) who reported complete resistance (100%) to streptomycin, florphenicol, and doxycycline. Salem et al., (2024) found complete resistance of P. aeruginosa to streptomycin, amoxicillin, doxycycline and erythromycin.

The biofilm formation in the isolated P. aeruginosa was studied using tube method and all isolates exhibited ability to produce biofilm. The obtained results recorded that 8 isolates (8/12, 66.7%) were strong producers for biofilm and the remaining 4 isolates (4/12, 33.3%) were moderate producers. These findings were in similarity with the previous study performed by Tawakol et al., (2018). However Abdelraheem et al., (2020) recorded strong biofilm, moderate and weak biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa isolates with percentages of (14%), (7%) and (6%) respectively.

      Concerning the obtained results of the in vitro antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of different Eucalyptus extract (40, 50, 75 and 100 mg/ 1ml) on 12 P. aeruginosa isolated in this study, it was found that the concentration of 40 mg/ 1ml had antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity against 4 out of 12 examined isolates. However, the concentrations 50, 75 and 100 mg/ 1ml showed antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities against all of the P. aeruginosa isolates. The mean values of the inhibition zones diameters (mean with standard deviation) were 3±4.5 mm, 8.8±0.72 mm, 12.4±0.8 mm and 14.2±0.72 mm for the concentrations 40, 50, 75 and 100 mg/ 1ml respectively. These findings were supported by Kaur et al., (2018) and Al-taai et al., (2022) who recorded that Eucalyptus extract prevented biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa pathogen. Our results were nearly coordinated with Kamel et al., (2011) who recorded higher antibacterial effects of Eucalyptus globules at a concentration of 100 mg/ 1ml against P. aeruginosa isolated from poultry. The results in this study was supported by Sabo and Knezevic, (2019) who mentioned that Eucalyptus camaldulensis extract and essential oils showed activity against Gram negative and Gram positive bacteria. The Eucalyptus camaldulensis extracts and essential oil had the most antibacterial activity in comparison with other species of the genus Eucalyptus. Bachheti et al., (2011) reported significant antibacterial effects of essential oil extracted from different Eucalyptus species against Pseudomonas, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, E.coli and Lactobacillus isolates. Another study conducted by Mota et al., (2015) mentioned that Eucalyptus globulus oil exhibited antimicrobial activity against different pathogens.

     With regard to the in ovo-inoculations of Eucalyptus extract in SPF embryonated chicken eggs (experiment 1), the effects of the extract on the embryonic mortalities and egg hatchability recorded that the inoculated groups (3), (4) and (5) showed (100%) hatchability and no embryonic mortalities. These findings reflected the safety of Eucalyptus extract on the embryonated chicken eggs with any negative effects on hatchability. Fathi et al., (2020) reported that the supplementing of quail diet with 0.1 Eucalyptus leaves powder as a feed additive enhanced the eggshell quality, immunocompetence and help in the reduction of broken Japanese quails eggs.

The evaluation of Eucalyptus extract in-ovo inoculation on post hatch P. aeruginosa infection in experimental chicks (experiment 2) showed no clinical signs in group 1 (negative control). Depression, ruffled feather, respiratory distress, diarrhea, (50%) mortalities, pneumonia, septicemia and congested internal organs were recorded in group (2, positive control). Some research studies identified clinical signs, gross lesion and mortalities resulted from experimental infection of chicks with P. aeruginosa such Badr et al., (2016) who indicated that the subcutaneous injection of P. aeruginosa in 3 days old chicks produced (100%) mortalities within 24-72 hours after injection and Shukla and Mishra, (2015) who reported 100% mortalities after intramuscularly and 30% after swapping of the palatine cleft with P. aeruginosa. The PM lesions showed congested liver, distended gall bladder, congested internal organs (heart, lungs and kidneys) and enlarged yolk sac. Bakheet and Torra, (2020) recorded 70% mortalities after P. aeruginosa subcutaneous infection within 3 dpc and the unabsorbed yolk sac, congested heart and lung and pale liver with petechial foci.

It was observed from this study that the Eucalyptus extract prevented mortalities and helps the reduction of clinical signs. In the inoculated groups (3) (received 50 mg/ml) and group (4) which received 75 mg/ml, mild clinical signs (depression, ruffled feather and respiratory distress with pneumonia and congested internal organs) were recorded. However in group (5) which received the higher concentration (100mg/ml) showed slight congestion in lung and liver of some chicks and slight clinical signs (depression and respiratory distress) which disappeared gradually and the chicks regain their viability at the 6dpc and 7dpc. The obtained findings may be attributed to the findings of Mashayekhi et al., (2018) who stated the positive effects of the extract as antimicrobial and antioxidant in addition to improving the bird’s immunity, Kamel et al., (2011) who reported the antibacterial effect of Eucalyptus against P. aeruginosa and Mustafa, (2019) who found that the dietary supplementation with Eucalyptus powder decreased the mortalities in broiler chicken.

      From table (4), the growth performance parameters that recorded at the end of experiment at (7th dpc) showed significant improvement in group (5) when compared with other groups. No significant difference was recorded between group 1 (negative control) and 4. The parameters were significant higher in group (4) and (5) than group (3). Lower performance parameters were recorded in the positive control (group, 2) when compared with other groups. The group (5) which received the higher Eucalyptus extract concentration (100 mg/ 1ml) showed higher improvement than group (4) which received 75 mg/ 1ml and group (3) which received 50 mg/ 1ml and these findings may be attributed to the using of higher concentration increase the absorbance of feed nutrients in the gastrointestinal tract. These findings were supported by Mustafa, (2019) who found that the supplementation of broiler with Eucalyptus improved relative length of the small intestine and duodenum (increasing number of goblet cells, crypt depth, villus height, improved lipase, amylase, chymotrypsin and trypsin, count of Lactobacillus). A researchers study performed by Mashayekhi et al., (2018) mentioned the effectiveness of Eucalyptus powder when added with a concentration of 0.5% in broiler diets as an alternative for antibiotics and improvement of growth performance. Mustafa, (2019) recorded significant higher body weight and body weight gain in case of the supplementation of broiler diet with Eucalyptus powder. On the other side Farhadi et al., (2017) reported different results about the dietary supplementation of Eucalyptus leaf powder in decreasing body weight gain during 7-28 days of age.

The mean CFU of P. aeruginosa (log10 CFU/g) was detected in the liver, lung, spleen and heart samples and the results showed that P. aeruginosa was localized in the examined internal organs in group (2) (positive control) with 6.95, 6.6, 5.9 and 5.3 CFU/g respectively. Lower colonization of P. aeruginosa was detected in group (4) than group (3). Lower colonization of P. aeruginosa was detected in group (4) than group (3). Group (5) showed lower colonization of P. aeruginosa in liver, lung, spleen and heart samples with 1.3, 1.2, 1 and 1 log10 CFU/g  respectively (table, 5). For chicks in group (5) Eucalyptus had the ability to reduce the colonization of P. aeruginosa than the other inoculated groups and this may explain the positive effect of the higher concentration of the extract (100mg/ml) in increasing the birds immunity, gut health and performance. These findings supported by Mashayekhi et al., (2018) and Farhadi et al., (2017) who reported the ability of Eucalyptus in improving immunity in broiler chickens. Some researchers such as Kamel et al., (2011) & Bachheti et al., (2011) and Pereira et al., (2014) reported the antibacterial activities of Eucalyptus against P. aeruginosa pathogen. The uses of Eucalyptus oil via spray or drinking water in broiler chicken can potentially help in controlling respiratory pathogens (Petrolli et al., 2019). The supplementation of Eucalyptus globulus extract in poultry feed showed antibacterial activity and help the reduction of Escherichia coli, Salmonella Pullorum and C. perfringens Type A counts in experimental birds (Ullah et al., 2021).

  1. aeruginosa is one of the most common bacteria producing biofilm (Vallet et al., 2001& Zhang et al., 2013, Tawakol et al., 2018 and Abdelraheem et al., 2020). It has the ability to persist in some tissues producing biofilm structure via a series of cellular interactions and adhesion to surfaces (Vallet et al., 2001). psl exopolysaccharide is one the main components of biofilm matrix which help the protection of bacteria from the effects of the antimicrobial agents and immune responses (AL-Sheikhly et al., 2020). Overhage et al., (2005) suggested the important role of pslA in the biofilm differentiation. For this reason, the inhibition of biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa is an important issue to control its adverse effects such as the protection of bacterial cell from the antimicrobial agents and immune responses. So that the effects of Eucalyptus extract in-ovo inoculation to control pslA gene expression was examined using quantitative RT-PCR technique. The obtained results showed lower mean values of the fold change expression in group (3), (4) and (5) in comparison to positive control group (2). However the mean fold change was down regulated in group (5) than group (3) and (5). These findings reflected the significant down regulation of pslA gene expression in group (5) which in-ovo inoculated with the higher Eucalyptus extract concentration (100mg/ml) in this study. The obtained results in this study showed the positive effects of Eucalyptus extract in-ovo inoculation as an alternative natural anti-biofilm substance.

Conclusion

It was concluded from this study that Eucalyptus extract showed in vitro antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities against P. aeruginosa. The Eucalyptus extract in-ovo inoculation with concentration of 100 mg/ml in embryonated chicken eggs showed no adverse effect on hatchability in addition to its ability to prevent mortalities, reduce clinical signs, improve growth performance parameters and reduce the colonization of P. aeruginosa in the internal organs of post hatched chicks. Furthermore the expression of pslA gene (responsible for biofilm formation) was significantly down regulated. These findings suggested the application of Eucalyptus extract in-ovo inoculation as an alternative natural approach to control P. aeruginosa in broiler farms. Further studies should be applied to determine the immune response and pathological changes in the experimental chicks. 

 

Abd El- Tawab A A, El-Hofy F I,  Khater D F, Al-Adl, M M. 2014. PCR detection and gene sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from broiler chickens. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal, 27 (2):449-455.
Abd El-Ghany WA. 2021. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection of avian origin: Zoonosis and one health implications, Veterinary World, 14(8): 2155-2159
Abdelraheem W M, Abdelkader A E, Mohamed E S, Mohammed M S .2020. Detection of biofilm formation and assessment of biofilm genes expression in different Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Meta Gene 23 (2020) 100646.
AL-Sheikhly M A H, Musleh L N, Al Mathkhury H J F. 2020. Gene Expression of pelA and pslA in Pseudomonas aeruginosa under Gentamicin Stress. Iraqi Journal of Science, 61 (2): 295-305.
Al-taai N A, Al-Gburi N M, Khalil N K. 2022. Antibacterial and Anti Biofilm activity of Eucalyptus Plant Extract Spp. REDVET - Revista electrónica de Veterinaria, 23 (3): 130- 148.
Al-Wrafy F, Brzozowska E, Górska S, Gamian A. 2017. Pathogenic factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa – the role of biofilm in pathogenicity and as a target for phage therapy. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (online), 2017; 71: 78-91
Ammer M R, Zaman S, Khalid M, Bilal M, Erum S, Huang D, Che S. 2016. Optimization of antibacterial activity of Eucalyptus tereticornis leaf extracts against Escherichia coli through response surface methodology. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences 9 (2016) 376- 385.
Bachheti R K, Joshi A, Singh A. 2011. Oil Content variation and Antimicrobial activity of Eucalyptus leaves oils of three different Species of Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. Int.J. ChemTech Res. 2011,3 (2) 625-628.
Badr H, Roshdy  H, Abd El-Hafez A S, Farghaly E. 2016. Prevalence, pathogenicity and antibiogram sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from diseased chickens. Assiut Vet. Med. J. (62) 119-126.
Badr J M, El Saidy F R, Abdelfattah A A. 2020. Emergence of Multi-Drug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Broiler Chicks. International Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 5 (2): 41-47.
Bakheet A A, Torra D E. 2020. Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Dead Chicken Embryo with Reference to Pathological Changes and Virulence Genes. AJVS. Vol. 65 (1): 81-89.
Christensen G D, Simpson W A, Bisno A L, Beachey E H. 1982. Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces. Infection and Immunity, 37(1), 318-326.
CLSI. 2020. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 30th ed. CLSI supplement M100. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
De Oliveira J E, van der Hoeven-Hangoor E, van de Linde I B, Montijn R C, van der Vossen J M B M. 2014.  In ovo inoculation of chicken embryos with probiotic bacteria and its effect on post hatch Salmonella susceptibility. Poult. Sci. 93, 818–829 (2014).
El-demerdash G O, EL-shafei A A, Mahmoud A E M, Roshdy, H. 2020. Potential risk of pseudomonas infection in broiler chickens with detection of the antibiotic resistant genes. Egypt Poult. Sci. Vol. (40) (IV): 783-792.
Elhariri M, Hamza D, Elhelw R, Refai M. 2016. Eucalyptus Tree: A Potential Source of Cryptococcus neoformans in Egyptian Environment. International Journal of Microbiology, 4080725, 1- 5. 
Farghaly E M, Roshdy H, Bakheet A A, Abd El-Hafez A S, Badr H. 2017. Advanced studies on Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in chicken. Animal Health Research Journal, 5, 4 (A): 207-217.
Farhadi D, Karimi A, Sadeghi G, Sheikhahmadi A, Habibian M, Raei A, Sobhani K. 2017. Effects of using eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus L.) leaf powder and its essential oil on growth performance and immune response of broiler chickens. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, vol 18, No. 1, Ser. No. 58, Pages 60-62.
Fathi M  M, Al-Homidan I, Ebeid T A, Abou-Emera O K, Mostafa M M. 2020 Dietary supplementation of Eucalyptus leaves enhances eggshell quality and immune response in two varieties of Japanese quails under tropical condition. Poultry Science 99:879–885.
Ghadaksaz A, Fooladi AAA, Hosseini H H, Amin M. 2015. The prevalence of some Pseudomonas virulence genes related to biofilm formation and alginate production among clinical isolates. Journal of Applied Biomedicine, 13 (1): 61-68.
Hassan W H, Ibrahim A M K, Shany S A S, Salam H S H. 2020. Virulence and resistance determinants in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from pericarditis in diseased broiler chickens in Egypt. J Adv Vet Anim Res 2020; 7(3):452–463.
International Standards Organization (ISO). 2004. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs. Horizontal method for detection and enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae, Part 2: colony count method. International Standards Organization, Geneva.
 Kamel G M, Ezz eldeen N A, El-Mishad M Y, Ezzat R F. 2011. Susceptibility Pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Against Antimicrobial Agents and Some Plant Extracts with Focus on its Prevalence in Different Sources. Global Veterinaria 6 (1): 61-72, 2011.
Kaur S, Sharma N, Aanchal, Ghambir A, Sharma A, Sharma A, Sharma V. 2018. Anti-biofilm potential of aqueous Eucalyptus leaf extract against nosocomial pathogens: Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The Pharma Innovation Journal 2018; 7(11): 425-432.
Kebede F. 2010. Pseudomonas infection in chickens. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health Vol. 2(4): 55-58.
 Marouf S, Li X, Salem H M, Ahmed Z S, Nader S M, Shaalan M, Awad F H, Zhou H, Cheang T. 2023. Molecular detection of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa of different avian sources with pathogenicity testing and in vitro evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of silver nanoparticles against multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Poultry Science 102:102995.
Mashayekhi H, Mazhari M, Esmaeilipour O. 2018. Eucalyptus leaves powder, antibiotic and probiotic addition to broiler diets: effect on growth performance, immune response, blood components and carcass traits. Animal, 12:10, 2049–2055.
Mota V, Turrini R N T, Poveda V. 2015. Antimicrobial activity of Eucalyptus globulus oil, xylitol and papain: a pilot study. Rev Esc Enferm USP · 2015; 49(2): 215-219.
Mustafa M A. 2019. Effect of Eucalyptus leaves and its supplementation with diet on broiler performance, microbial and physiological statues to alleviate cold stress. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences –1029:50(1):953-963.
Nabil N M, Tawakol M M, Samir A, Hassan H M, Yonis A E, Reda R M, Elsayed M M. 2023. Synergistic infuence of probiotic and forfenicol on embryonic viability, performance, and multidrug‑resistant Salmonella Enteritidis in broiler chickens. Scientific Reports, 13:9644.
Overhage J, Schemionek M, Webb J S, Rehm B H A. 2005. Expression of the psl Operon in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 Biofilms: PslA Performs an Essential Function in Biofilm Formation. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 71 (8): 4407–4413.
 Pereira V, Diasb C, Vasconcelos MC, Rosa, E, Saavedra M J. 2014. Antibacterial activity and synergistic effects between Eucalyptus globulus leaf residues (essential oils and extracts) and antibiotics against several isolates of respiratory tract infections (Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Industrial Crops and Products 52 (2014) 1– 7.
Petrolli T G,  Sutille M A, Petrolli O J, Stefani L M, Simionatto A T, Tavernari F C, Zotti C A, Girardini L K. 2019. Eucalyptus oil to mitigate heat stress in broilers. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 48:e20160306.
Quinn P J, Markey B K, Carter M E, Donnelly W J, Leonard F C. 2002. Veterinary Microbiology and Microbial Disease. (1st ed., pp: 43-122). Cornwall, Great Britain. Blackwell Science Ltd.
Radwan I A, Shehata A A E, Abd Elwahab S H. 2018. Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Recovered from Kidney Lesions of Broiler Chickens. Assiut Vet. Med. J., 64 (156) 2018, 110-116.
Ramatla T, Mokgokong P, Lekota K, Thekisoe O. 2024. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated from broiler chickens. Food Microbiology 120 (2024) 104476.
Sabo V A, Knezevic P. 2019. Antimicrobial activity of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. plant extracts and essential oils: A review. Ind Crops Prod, 132:413-429.
Salem M, Younis G, Sadat A, Nouh N A T, Binjawhar D N,  Abdel‑Daim M M, Elbadawy M, Awad, A. 2024. Dissemination of mcr‑1 and β-lactamase genes among Pseudomonas aeruginosa: molecular characterization of MDR strains in broiler chicks and dead-in-shell chicks infections. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob (2024) 23:9.
Samanta I, Joardar S N, Palas Das, Ghosh, D, Sar T K, Taraphder S. 2012. Multi Drug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa From Wild Hanuman Langur in India. Journal of Biomedical Sciences, 1 No. 2:1 doi: 10.3823/1005.
 Shukla S, Mishra, P. 2015. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Broiler Chicks in Jabalpur. International J Ext Res. 6:37-39.
Spilker T, Coenye T, Vandamme P, LiPuma J J. 2004. PCR-Based Assay for Differentiation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Other Pseudomonas Species Recovered from Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Journal Of Clinical Microbiology, May 2004, p. 2074–2079.
Tawakol M M, Nabil NM, Reda R M. 2018. Molecular studies on some virulence factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from chickens as a biofilm forming bacteria. Assiut Vet. Med. J, 64 (159): 43-51.
Ullah A, Anjum A A, Rabbani M, Ijaz M, Nawaz M, Ashraf M, Ali A, Rashid A, Najeeb I, Hussain A. 2021. Activity of ethanolic extract of Eucalyptus globulus leaves against multi drug resistant poultry pathogens in broiler chicks. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy le Grand), 67 (1): 153-158.
Vallet I, Olson J W, Lory S, Lazdunski A, Filloux A. 2001. The chaperoneyusher pathways of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Identification of fimbrial gene clusters (cup) and their involvement in biofilm formation. PNAS, 2001, 98 (12): 6911–6916
Wilson C, Lukowicz R, Merchant S, Valquier-Flynn H, Caballero  J, Sandoval J, Okuom M, Huber C, Brooks T D, Wilson E, Clement B, Wentworth C D, Holmes A E. 2017. Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment Methods for Biofilm Growth: A Mini-review. Res Rev J Eng Technol. 2017 6(4): 1-25.
Yong X, Ling Y, Xiao-cui Z, Li-zhen L, Peng L, Wei-sheng C. 2020. Rapid detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by cross priming amplification. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2020, 19(10): 2523–2529.
Yuan J S, Reed A, Chen F, Stewart CN. 2006. Statistical analysis of real-time PCR data. BMC Bioinformatics, 7:85.
Zhang L, Fritsch M, Hammond L, Landreville R, Slatculescu C, Colavita A, Mah T. 2013. Identification of Genes Involved in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm-Specific Resistance to Antibiotics. PLoS ONE 8(4): e61625.