Molecular identification of vancomycin and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in baby chicks with omphalitis in Egypt

Document Type : Original researches

Abstract

Vancomycin and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VMRSA) is one of the important emerging pathogens worldwide that pose a challenge to a wide range of diseases in humans and animals. It is responsible for causing nosocomial and community infections, but it has also been reported to cause livestock infections. The aim of the study was to investigate the occurrence of vancomycin- and methicillin-resistant S. aureus in baby chicks with omphalitis in Egypt. Out of a total of 200 chicks, 10 isolates were recognized as S. aureus by microbiological and molecular methods. All S. aureus isolates were subjected to in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing against 12 antimicrobial agents by the disc diffusion method. Isolates revealed 100% resistance to clindamycin, methicillin, and amoxicillin, followed by azithromycin and quinupristin/dalfopristin (81.8%). Whereas, perceptible resistance was observed against sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, erythromycin, Linezolid, and tetracycline, with a percentage of 72.7%. Conversely, there is a higher sensitivity to gentamycin and ciprofloxacin, with percentages of 27% for each. The MIC results of vancomycin did not display inhibition of the growth of the tested isolates. Vancomycin had high MIC values of 64 μg/ml against all tested S. aureus isolates, which exhibited MIC values of 32 μg/ml. All isolates were found to be multidrug-resistant (MDR), indicating that they were resistant to at least three different classes of antibiotics. Molecular detection for the antibiotic resistance gene revealed that the mecA gene was detected in (10/11) isolates of S. aureus with a percentage of 90.9% which is responsible for methicillin resistance. None of the isolates contained mecC gene. Amplification of Spa virulence gene by using PCR showed that all isolates were positive for spa gene with a percentage of (100%). Furthermore, van A gene was detected in (6/11) isolates (54.4%), and van B was detected in 5/11 isolates with a percentage of 45.5%. The findings of this study confirm the presence of multi-drug resistant organisms in chicks. It significantly points to the great need to evaluate and monitor the incidence rate of multi-drug resistant organisms. The presence of VMRSA in poultry meat is of great concern for public health. Strict supervision and enforcement of laws to control the antibiotic usage in the food chain within established safe levels must be followed.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Molecular identification of vancomycin and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in baby chicks with omphalitis in Egypt

 

Shaimaa H. Shaltot 1Abdelhafez Samir1& Nesma. M. Kamel 1

 

1Reference laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control on Poultry Production, Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Agricultural Re-search Centre (ARC), Dokki, Giza, Egypt.

 

Abstract

 

Vancomycin and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VMRSA) is one of the important emerging pathogens worldwide that pose a challenge to a wide range of diseases in humans and animals. It is responsible for causing nosocomial and community infections, but it has also been reported to cause livestock infections. The aim of the study was to investigate the occurrence of vancomycin- and methicillin-resistant S. aureus in baby chicks with omphalitis in Egypt. Out of a total of 200 chicks, 10 isolates were recognized as S. aureus by microbiological and molecular methods. All S. aureus isolates were subjected to in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing against 12 antimicrobial agents by the disc diffusion method. Isolates revealed 100% resistance to clindamycin, methicillin, and amoxicillin, followed by azithromycin and quinupristin/dalfopristin (81.8%). Whereas, perceptible resistance was observed against sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, erythromycin, Linezolid, and tetracycline, with a percentage of 72.7%. Conversely, there is a higher sensitivity to gentamycin and ciprofloxacin, with percentages of 27% for each. The MIC results of vancomycin did not display inhibition of the growth of the tested isolates. Vancomycin had high MIC values of 64 μg ml−1 against all tested S. aureus isolates, which exhibited MIC values of 32 μg ml−1. All isolates were found to be multidrug-resistant (MDR), indicating that they were resistant to at least three different classes of antibiotics. Molecular detection for the antibiotic resistance gene revealed that the mecA gene was detected in (10/11) isolates of S. aureus with a percentage of 90.9% which is responsible for methicillin resistance. None of the isolates contained mecC gene. Amplification of Spa virulence gene by using PCR showed that all isolates were positive for spa gene with a percentage of (100%). Furthermore, van A gene was detected in (6/11) isolates (54.4%), and van B was detected in 5/11 isolates with a percentage of 45.5%. The findings of this study confirm the presence of multi-drug resistant organisms in chicks. It significantly points to the great need to evaluate and monitor the incidence rate of multi-drug resistant organisms. The presence of VMRSA in poultry meat is of great concern for public health. Strict supervision and enforcement of laws to control the antibiotic usage in the food chain within established safe levels must be followed.

 

Key words: VMRSA, S. aureus, mecA and vanA.

 

Introduction

Egypt's poultry sector faced a variety of issues. One of them was early chick mortality, which caused significant economic losses, and many poultry experts and men have requested that it be investigated. In chickens, staphylococci, particularly S. aureus, are known to cause a variety of illnesses ranging from acute septicemia to chronic osteomyelitis. S. aureus is attracting widespread attention as a result of multi-resistant strains, which reduce the utility of antibiotics in human and animal medicine and so limit therapeutic alternatives. Staphylococcal infections were a widespread problem in chickens and turkeys, resulting in economic losses due to reduced egg production and weight gain (Adayel, 2005).

 

  1. aureus can be found in the natural microbiota of chicken skin, feathers, respiratory tracts, and digestive tracts, just like in humans and other animals (Olayinka et al., 2010). S. aureus is associated with a number of clinical signs, including tenosynovitis, omphalitis, femoral head necrosis, infected hock and stifle joints caused by coccidiosis, and "bumblefoot" (Suleiman et al., 2013). It also causes skin and food-borne illnesses in animals, birds, and humans (El-Ghany, 2021). It is well recognized that S. aureus has zoonotic potential and poses a considerable foodborne danger to global public health (Zaman et al., 2020). However, this pathogen has been linked to a number of clinical conditions, including dermatitis, arthritis, osteomyelitis, synovitis, and omphalitis (El-Tawab et al., 2017).

Omphalitis can be defined as an inflammation of the navel. The term "navel ill" is widely used to describe incorrect navel closure followed by bacterial infection (mushy chick illness). It occurs within the first few days of life. It is spread from filthy hatchery equipment to newly hatched birds with unhealed navels. Bacteria linked with omphalitis have been shown to deteriorate and decompose critical residual yolk sac (RYS) nutrients that should have been used as a source of energy during the post-hatch period (Khan et al., 2004). Bacterial infection of the navel area is one of the leading causes of mortality in chicks within the first week of hatching (Pattison et al., 2008). Several microbes, including E. coli. Salmonella spp. Proteus spp. Enterobacter spp. Pseudomonas spp. Klebsiella spp. Staphylococcus species. Streptococcus species. Clostridium spp. Bacillus cereus and Enterococcus were identified from bird yolk sac infections (Cortes et al., 2004).

 

The clinically most important MDR bacteria include extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) Enterobacteriaceae, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE). These three types of resistant bacteria are seen not just in hospitals, but also in farm animals and meat (Holzel et al., 2010). At present, about 70% of pathogenic microorganisms leading to nosocomial infections are resistant to at least one antimicrobial drug that were previously effective (Fair and Tor, 2014).

 

The term "MRSA" represents resistance to at least one antibiotic in three or more categories. Resistance 

to oxacillin or cefoxitin suggests nonsusceptibility to most βlactam antibiotics (Magiorakos et al., 2012).Waters et al. (2011) found that around 96% of S. aureus strains are resistant to at least one antibiotic, with 32% resistant to multiple antimicrobial classes.MRSA had its first appearance in 1961 in England (Fluit et al., 2013).It is a common human and animal pathogen that has been detected in numerous clinical trials (Persoons et al., 2009).MRSA is currently known as a superbug since it is resistant to practically every antibiotic available for treating Staphylococcus spp. (Stapleton & Taylor, 2007).Vancomycin is the recommended antibiotic for MRSA infections’ was isolated for the first time more than two decades ago (Chambers,2001). After this, vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) has been isolated from more countries in North America, Europe, Asia, Africa, and South America (Chesneau et al., 2000).

 

The use of antibiotics in poultry and livestock production is favorable to farmers and the economy as well because it has generally improved poultry performance effectively and economically, but at the same time, the likely dissemination of antibiotic resistant strains of pathogenic and non-pathogenic organisms into the environment and their further transmission to humans via the food chain could also lead to serious consequences on public health (WHO,2014). In addition to antibiotic resistance increasing from natural selection, bacteria can receive genetic material through the process of Horizontal Gene Transfer (HGT). HGT conferring resistance to many classes of antimicrobials has resulted in a worldwide epidemic of nosocomial and community infections caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms, leading to suggestions that mankind in effect is returning to the pre-antibiotic era (Warnes et al., 2012).

Regulatory measures such as restriction or banning the use of antimicrobial compounds for specific purposes, or in specific animal species, have also been established. Keeping these concerns of multidrug resistance in consideration, this study is undertaken for isolation and molecular identification of vancomycin and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus in baby chicks with omphalitis in Egypt.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. Materials and methods

2.1. Samples

Between November 2022 and August 2023, 200 organ samples (liver, heart, intestine and yolk sac) were collected from 1-day-old broiler chicks with omphalitis from different governorates in Egypt.  The broiler chicks ranged in age from 1 to 7 days. The samples were transported in sterile plastic bags under aseptic conditions to the Reference Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control on Poultry Production, Dokki, Egypt (RLQP), in cool boxes with ice packs to isolate Staphylococcus aureus.

2.2. Isolation and identification of Staphylococcus aureus

 Staphylococcus aureus was isolated according to Shokry et al. (2018) by inoculating 10 g of samples into 90 ml of buffer peptone water (Oxoid Limited, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., UK) and incubating at 37 °C for 24 h. A loopful of enriched samples was then streaked on Baird Parker agar (Oxoid Limited, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., UK) and Mannitol Salt Agar plates (Oxoid Limited, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., UK), and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. The plates were examined for the presence of black colonies without clear or opaque zones on Barid Parker and yellow or red colonies on Mannitol Salt agar. The suspected Staphylococcus aureus colonies were identified according to Holt et al. (1994) using different biochemical tests such as coagulase, catalase, sugar fermentation (mannose, sucrose, mannitol, trehalose, maltose, lactose, and rafnose), urea, Voges-Proskauer, ONPG, and novobiocin sensitivity.

2.3. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolated Staphylococcus aureus isolates using disk diffusion

The phenotypic antimicrobial profile of the isolated Staphylococcus aureus was assessed by disk diffusion technique using 12 commercial disks (Oxoid Limited, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., UK) following Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines (CLSI 2020). The tobramycin and methicillin breakpoints for the disk diffusion test were interpreted according to CLSI (2017). The antibiotic disks and corresponding concentrations used in this study were clindamycin (2 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), gentamycin (10 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), azithromycin (15 μg), methicillin (5 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (25 μg), amoxicillin (25 μg), linezolid (30 μg), and quinupristin/dalfopristin (15 μg). Isolates shown to be resistant to at least three different classes of agents were classified as multidrug resistant (MDR) (Kiratisin et al., 2008).

 

2.4. Determination of multi-drug resistance index (MDRI)

Multi-drug resistance index (MDRI) of individual isolates was calculated by dividing the number of antibiotics to which the isolate was resistant by the total number of antibiotics to which the isolate was exposed (Chandran et al., 2008). Isolates with MDRI values of more than 0.2 were considered highly resistant.

 

2.5. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for vancomycin using the broth macrodilution method

The MIC test was used to determine the susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolates to vancomycin, as the disk diffusion test cannot distinguish between vancomycin-susceptible, -intermediate, and resistant isolates. All of these give inhibition-zones with similar diameter sizes (CLSI 2020). The microdilution broth technique was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin against 25 isolated Staphylococcus aureus following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI 2017; CLSIM07-A9, 2012). Vancomycin was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). The MIC breakpoints of vancomycin against Staphylococcus species range from 4 to 32 mg/mL

(CLSI 2020). To obtain the different concentrations of vancomycin, a twofold serial dilution was carried out from the working solution (1 mg/mL). For the preparation of bacterial inoculums, pure overnight yellow or red colonies cultured on mannitol salt agar medium were suspended in Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) medium (Oxoid Limited, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., UK) and adjusted to 5× 105 CFUml−1 as described by CLSIM07-A9 (2012). In the dilution series, 100 µl of each bacterial inoculum was added to 2 ml of MHB medium containing vancomycin. The tubes were incubated for 16 to 20 h at 35±2 °C. The last two tubes contained a positive control for each Staphylococcus species isolate and a negative control for MHB. The MIC was considered the lowest vancomycin concentration, which produced no visible growth (no turbidity was recorded).

 

2.6. Genotypic characterization by PCR:

DNA extraction from samples was performed using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany, GmbH) with modifications from the manufacturer’s recommendations. Briefly, 200 µl of the sample suspension was incubated with 10 µl of proteinase K and 200 µl of lysis buffer at 56OC for 10 min. After incubation, 200 µl of 100% ethanol was added to the lysate. The sample was then washed and centrifuged following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Nucleic acid was eluted with 100 µl of elution buffer provided in the kit.

Oligonucleotide primers used in PCR have specific sequences and amplify specific products, as shown in Table 1. Primers were utilized in a 25- µl reaction containing 12.5 µl of Emerald Amp Max PCR Master Mix (Takara, Japan), 1 µl of each primer of 20 pmol concentration, 5.5 µl of water, and 5 µl of DNA template. The reaction was performed in an Applied Biosystems 2720 thermal cycler.

 

The products of PCR were separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel (Applichem, Germany, GmbH) in 1x TBE buffer at room temperature using gradients of 5V/cm (Sambrook et al., 1989). For gel analysis, 15 µl of the products were loaded into each gel slot. Agene ruler 100 bp ladder (Fermentas, Germany) was used to determine the fragment sizes. The gel was photographed by a gel documentation system (Alpha Innotech, Biometra) and the data was analyzed through computer software. (Automatic Image Capture Software, Protein Simple , Formerly Cell Bioscience, USA)

 

 

 

 

 

3.Results

3.1. Incidence of S. aureus in chicks

In this study, out of 200 organ samples, 10 (5%) were positive for S. aureus by phenotypic isolation and PCR technique.

3.2. Antimicrobial sensitivity test:

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing against 12 antimicrobial agents was done by the disc diffusion method. S. aureus revealed 100% resistance to clindamycin, methicillin, and amoxicillin, followed by azithromycin and quinupristin/dalfopristin with a percentage of 81.8%. Whereas perceptible resistance was observed against sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, erythromycin, Linezolid, and tetracycline, with 72.7% of the isolates being resistant (for each). Conversely, there is a higher sensitivity to gentamycin and ciprofloxacin, with percentages of 27% for each. Table 2. The MIC results of vancomycin did not display inhibition of the growth of the tested isolates. Vancomycin had high MIC values of 64 μg ml−1 against all tested S. aureus isolates, which exhibited MIC values of 32 μg ml−1.

All isolates were found to be multidrug-resistant (MDR), indicating they were resistant to at least three different classes of antibiotics. (Table3).

3.3. Identification of MRSA and VRSA producers

All isolates that were resistant to methicillin are considered MRSA. The strains of Staphylococcus aureus that were found to be resistant to vancomycin were screened as VRSA with a percentage of 81.8%. Table 2.

3.4. Molecular characterization of resistant and resistant genes in S. aureus:

Molecular detection for the antibiotic resistance gene revealed mecA was detected in 10/11 of isolated S. aureus with a percentage of 90.9%, which is responsible for methicillin resistance in S. aureus (Fig. 1). None of the isolates contained the mec C gene (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the vanA gene was detected in 6/11 isolates (54.4%), vanB was detected in 5/11 isolates with a percentage of 45.5%, and van C1 was detected only in two isolates with a percentage of 18.2%, as shown in Figs. 4 and 6.

3.5. Molecular characterization of virulence genes of S. aureus revealed that the Spa gene was present in all isolates with a percentage of 100% (Fig 3).

 

 

 

 

Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers for PCR amplification of antibiotic resistance and virulance genes of isolated S. aureus.

Microbial agent

Gene

Primer sequence

(5'-3')

Amplified segment (bp)

Reference

S. aureus

mecC

GCTCCTAATGCTAATGCA

304 bp

Cuny et al., 2011

 

TAAGCAATAATGACTACC

 

mecA

GTA GAA ATG ACT GAA CGT CCG ATA A

310 bp

McClure et al., 2006

 

CCA ATT CCA CAT TGT TTC GGT CTA A

 

vanA

CATGACGTATCGGTAAAATC

885 bp

Patel et al., 1997

 

ACCGGGCAGRGTATTGAC

 

Spa

TCA ACA AAG AAC AAC AAA ATG C

 226 bp

Wada et al., 2010

 

GCT TTC GGT GCT TGA GAT TC

 

vanB

GTGACAAACCGGAGGCGAGGA

 433 bp

Kariyama et al., 2000

 

CCGCCATCCTCCTGCAAAAAA

 

VanC1

GGTATCAAGGAAACCTC

822 bp

 

CTTCCGCCATCATAGCT

           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolated S. aureus using the disk diffusion test

 

 

Antibiotic

Resistant isolates number (%)

Intermediate isolates number (%)

Sensitive isolates

number (%)

Clindamycin (CD)

11(100%)

0

0

Erythromycin (E)

8(72.7%)

3(27%)

0

Trimethoprim -sulphamethoxazole (SXT)

8(72.7%)

1(9%)

2(18%)

Gentamycin (G)

4(36%)

4(36%)

3(27%)

Tetracycline (T)

8(72.7%)

3(27%)

0

Azithromycin (AZI)

9(81.8%)

2(18%)

0

Methicillin (M)

11(100%)

0

0

Ciprofloxacin (CIP)

2(18%)

6(54.5%)

3(27%)

Chloramphenicol (C)

6(54.5%)

4(36%)

1(9%)

Amoxicillin (AMX)

11(100%)

0

0

Linezolid (LNZ)

8(72.7%)

0

3(27%)

Quinupristin/dalfopristin (QDA)  

Vancomycin

9(81.8%)

 

9(81.8%)

2(18.2%)

 

(18.2%)

0

 

The percentage of sensitive, intermediate, and resistant S. aureus isolates were calculated according to total number of isolates for Staphylococcus aureus (11), breakpoints for disk diffusion were according to CLSI 2017 and 2020.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 3. Drug resistance patterns and molecular characterization of the 11 strains of S. aureus.

Isolate

Resistant

Antibiotic

MDR
index

MDR

mec A

mec C

vanA

van B

van C

spa

1.

CD-SXT-G-V-M-AMX

0.5

+

+

-

+

-

-

+

2.

CD-E-SXT-AZ-T-C-L-AMX-Q-V-M

0.9

+

+

-

+

-

-

+

3.

CD-E-G-AZ-C-CIP-L-T-AMX-M-Q-V

1

+

+

-

-

+

+

+

4.

CD-E-SXT-AZ-C-T-M-CIP-L-AMX-Q-V

1

+

+

-

-

+

-

+

5.

CD-E-AZ-G-C-T-M-L-AMX-Q

0.8

+

+

-

+

-

-

+

6.

CD-E-SXT-AZ-AMX-Q-V-M-T-L

0.8

+

+

-

+

-

-

+

7.

CD-SXT-AZ-V-M-AMX-L

0.6

+

+

-

+

-

-

+

8.

CD-Q-V-M-SXT

0.4

+

-

-

+

-

-

+

9.

CD-E-G-AZ-T-Q-M-AMX

0.7

+

+

-

-

+

+

+

10.

CD-E-SXT-AZ-T-C-L-AMX-Q-V-M

0.9

+

+

-

-

+

-

+

11.

CD-E-SXT-AZ-T-C-L-AMX-Q-V-M

0.9

+

+

-

-

+

-

+

     

 

11/11

 

10/11

 

0/11

 

6/11

 

5/11

 

2/11

 

11/11

 

 

 

 

 

 Fig 1. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR for detection of mecA gene in S. aureus. Showing amplification of 310 bp. in 10/11 examined samples. L (Ladder): DNA ladder (100-1000 bp). All samples are positive except one sample Lane (8). P: Positive control; N: Negative control.

 Fig 2. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR for detection of mec C gene in S. aureus. Showing no amplification of 304 bp. in 11 examined samples. L (Ladder): DNA ladder (100-1000bp).. P: Positive control; N: Negative control.

 

 

 Fig3. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR for detection of Spa gene in S. aureus. Showing amplification of 226 bp. in 11 examined samples. L (Ladder): DNA ladder (100-1000bp). P: Positive control; N: Negative control.

 

 

Fig4. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR for detection of Van C1 gene in S. aureus in 2/11 examined samples. L (Ladder): DNA ladder (100-1000bp). All samples are negative except two samples lanes (3&9) is positive. P: Positive control; N: Negative control.

 

 

Fig5. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR for detection of Van A gene in S. aureus in 6/11 examined samples. L (Ladder): DNA ladder (100-1000bp). six samples are positive lanes (1,2,5,6,7&8). P: Positive control; N: Negative control.

 

 

 

Fig6. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR for detection of Van B gene in S. aureus in 5/11 examined samples. L (Ladder): DNA ladder (100-1000bp). five samples are positive lanes (3,4,9,10&11). P: Positive control; N: Negative control.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion

  1. aureus is a bacterium of significant importance because of its ability to cause a wide range of diseases and its capacity to adapt to diverse environmental forms (Waldvogel, 2000). In poultry, S. aureus isa ubiquitous pathogen found in feedstuffs as well as on equipment and utensils present in farms. It is considered an important cause of omphalitis, gangrenous dermatitis, and localized abscesses. (Abou-Zahr et al., 2018). Many studies recorded that E. coli, Salmonella spp., and Staphylococcus spp. were identified as the major bacterial species responsible for omphalitis in broiler and layer chicks examined. These bacterial agents were also found to be associated with omphalitis in chicks earlier by Sato et al. (1961) and Ijaz et al. (1994).

 The prevalence of Staphylococci with omphalitis cases ranked at 5% in this study, which disagrees with Nasrin et al. (2012), who recorded 24% in 1-3-day-old chicks and 28.6% in 4-7-day-old chicks, but a previous study (Iqbal et al., 2006) recorded a 0.5% prevalence of Staphylococci. It is therefore suggested that chicks be obtained from hatcheries that adopt strict hygienic measures during the whole hatching process. Moreover, a hygienic environment should be provided to the young chicks during brooding, and special attention should be paid to the humidity in the brooding house.

 The low incidence of S. aureus in this study agreed with Wladyka et al. (2011), who stated that the incidence rate of staphylococcosis in chickens ranges from 0.5 to 20%. On the other hand, the current result disagreed with Rasheed (2011), who isolated a higher percent (50.98%) of S. aureus from broiler chickens. The difference in percentage of isolation could be attributed to many factors, some of which are related to birds, such as age, immune virulence, and resistance gene detection. Other factors might be related to differences in hygienic measures inside farms.

 Extensive use and misuse of antimicrobial drugs in the poultry industry is the main cause of resistance to commonly used antibiotics and the rise of multi-drug-resistant strains (Sharada et al., 2009). In the present study, the antibiotic resistance patterns of Staphylococcus aureus in poultry show resistance to various antibiotics commonly used in veterinary medicine. High percentages of resistance were detected for clindamycin and amoxicillin (100% resistant isolates). Contrary to the findings of Benrabia et al. (2020) and Silva et al. (2022), who reported resistance to clindamycin in a percentage of 68.6%, 97.5%, and 97.3%, respectively, the level of resistance in this study was higher.

The resistance to quinupristin/dalfopristin in this study was higher than that obtained by Malik et al. (2023), who revealed resistance in a percentage of 13%. It was reported that the azithromycin resistance in this study was 81.8%, lower than those obtained by Malik et al. (2023), who reported resistance in a percentage of 84%. Considering this study, 11 isolates (100%) were methicillin-resistant, which was higher than those obtained by Malik et al. (2023), of whom only 4% were resistant to methicillin. The reason behind the high prevalence of MRSA might be due to the high common use of methicillin for treatment and growth purposes, as well as to avoid the widespread use of penicillin. MRSA is frequently associated with other antibiotic resistance, particularly aminoglycoside resistance, fluoroquinolones, lincosamides, and macrolides. In addition, vancomycin and linezolid (Shlaes & Projan, 2009).

 

Increase the prevalence of MRSA in the current study. Go ahead with many studies. Previously, El-Tawab et al. (2017) detected 66.6% MRSA from chicken samples in Giza, Egypt. Recently, Olayinka et al. (2010) also reported 39.8% MRSA from poultry farm isolates in Zaria, Nigeria. Benrabia et al. (2020) reported 33.5% MRSA in laying hens. But the dissimilar results of MRSA reported in chicken meat were found to be 20.0% in Bangladesh (Ali et al., 2017) and 25.0% from fresh chicken in Germany (Feßler et al., 2011). 15.9% MRSA in broilers in Algeria. Earlier,

Moreover, an increase in the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA, 80.8%) was observed in the present study. This is in line with other documented percentages of vancomycin resistance (9%–46%) among S. aureus isolates in animals and food on the African continent, as reported by Lozano et al. (2016). This study's findings on vancomycin resistance contrast with the findings reported by Naeim et al. (2023), who found 100% susceptibility to vancomycin. Also, Osman et al. (2016) found vancomycin- and methicillin-resistant poultry in proportions of 27.8% and 52.8%, respectively. Recently, El-Ghany et al. (2021) reported 54% VRSA from poultry in northwest Algeria. Vancomycin is not commonly used for the treatment of poultry infections. But various degrees of vancomycin resistance were found during antibiotic susceptibility testing of poultry samples. For decades, vancomycin has been frequently used where MRSA is found (Cong et al., 2019).

The antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed the occurrence of multidrug-resistant S. aureus in poultry. Similar high resistance to beta-lactams and erythromycin has been equally reported among coagulase-positive S. aureus isolated from smallholder flocks in Maiduguri, northeastern Nigeria (EFSA, 2011) and in Zaria, north-central Nigeria (Otalu et al., 2011). The overuse of antibiotics in animal husbandry and for other veterinary purposes encourages resistant microbes to emerge via selective pressure (Enemor et al., 2015). The high resistance of S. aureus to beta lactams may be due to the actions of β-lactamase and/or cephalosporins, which destroy the β-lactam antibiotics (Ogundare & Ekundayo, 2016), or the production of PBP2a, an alternative target that is resistant to inhibition by the penicillins (Akagha et al., 2015).

It was found that most isolates were highly sensitive to Ciprofloxacine and gentamicin; similar findings were reported by Ciocîrlan (2008), contradictory to those reported by Jamali et al. (2015), who stated that S. aureus is resistant to gentamicin and ciproflaoxicin. The differences in resistance patterns are widely due to factors that include differences in geographical locations, particular bacteria species involved, animal production systems, the extent to which antibiotics are used, sampling techniques, and the period of sampling (Adzitey et al., 2015).

All 11 (100%) S. aureus isolates detected proved to be MDR. Similar results of MDR were reported in previous investigations on chicken meat and were found to be 75.0% in Bangladesh (Ali et al., 2017) and 18.2% in the United States (Hanson et al., 2011).

Molecular detection of the antibiotic resistance gene for S. aureus revealed that all examined 10/11 isolates (90.9%) of S. aureus were positive for the mecA gene. The mecA gene is responsible for the resistance to methicillin, which codes for the penicillin-binding protein PBP 2A (Wielders et al., 2002). This was also reported by Pyzik et al. (2014), who detected the mecA gene in two S. aureus-like strains isolated from table eggs. Zarfel et al. (2010) detected 26 ESBL-producing E. coli, five mecA genes harboring Staphylococci (but no MRSA), and four VRE in chicken meat samples of Austrian origin.

 

In the current study, the van A gene was detected in 6/11 isolates (54.4%), and van B was detected in 5/11 isolates with a percentage of 45.5%. The high detection rate of the van A phenotype in the poultry is consistent with the findings by other researchers (Radu et al., 2001). Only two isolates harbored van C1. A previous study by Radu et al. (2001) reported that van A and vanC2/C3 genotypes were isolated from poultry in Malaysia but not van B. Considering VRE isolated from poultry and other animal sources, Van A-type resistance is predominant (Chen et al., 2002).

S.aureus attaches to the surface of the host cell to begin the colonization process via adhesins that the bacteria have on their surface (Yīlmaz et al., 2022). The majority of the adhesins present in S. aureus are protein A proteins in the X-region and Lg G-binding regions that are found in cell peptidoglycan (spa) (Sharma et al., 2016). Due to its ability to attach to molecules and agglutinate bacteria against particular bacterial antigens, protein A is utilized as a crucial reagent in immunology and diagnostic laboratory technology because it can attach to molecules and agglutinate bacteria against a particular antigen (Atalla, 2010). The spa gene produces protein A as a result of this process. The investigation indicated that all isolates were positive for the presence of the spa (X-region) gene.

In this study 11 isolates were screened for virulence genes using PCR. The results of this investigation revealed 100 % (11/11) of the isolates carrying the spa gene. This result disagrees with the result recorded by Momtaz et al. (2013), who reported a spa with a percentage of 26.82%, respectively.

Conclusion

MRSA found in poultry and poultry farm personnel is a major health issue that indicates the zoonotic significance of MRSA. In this study, we found MRSA and VRSA in broiler chicks’s samples, which reveal the direct threat to the consumer’s health. The findings underscore the necessity of mitigating actions based on the farm-to-fork principle at all points in the poultry production chain to prevent or eradicate MRSA transmission in humans, poultry, and farms. The implementation of continued surveillance and monitoring schemes for the S. aureus continuum to monitor their emergence, spread, and significance to human health. Additionally, measures such as reducing the use of antibiotics as growth promoters.

Abou-Zahr, T., Carrasco, D. C., Shimizu, N., Forbes, N. A., Dutton, T. A., Froehlich, F., & De Bellis, F. (2018). Superficial chronic ulcerative dermatitis (SCUD) in psittacine birds: Review of 11 cases (2008-2016). Journal of avian medicine and surgery32(1), 25-33.‏
Adayel, S. A. (2005). Incidence of Staphylococcus aureus causing Arthritis of broiler breeders. In 4th Int Sci Conf Mansoura (pp. 65-70).‏
Adzitey, F.;Teye, G.A.; and Anachinaba, I.A. (2015): Microbial quality of fresh and smoked guinea fowl meat sold in the Bolgatanga Municipality, Ghana. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 9: 165-171.
Akagha, T. N., Gugu, T. H., Enemor, E. C., Ejikeugwu, P. C., Ugwu, B. C., & Ugwu, M. C. (2015). Prevalence and antibiogram of Salmonella species and Staphylococcus aureus in retail meats sold in Awka metropolis, southeast Nigeria. Int. J. Biol. Pharmaceut. Res6(12), 924-929.‏
Ali, Y., Islam, M. A., Muzahid, N. H., Sikder, M. O. F., Hossain, M. A., & Marzan, L. W. (2017). Characterization, prevalence and antibiogram study of Staphylococcus aureus in poultry. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine7(3), 253-256.‏
Atalla, H. N. (2010). Bovine Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants (SCVs) and the responses they induce in persistent bovine mastitis compared to their parental strains (Doctoral dissertation, University of Guelph).‏
Benrabia, I., Hamdi, T. M., Shehata, A. A., Neubauer, H., & Wareth, G. (2020). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in poultry species in Algeria: Long-term study on prevalence and antimicrobial resistance. Veterinary sciences7(2), 54.‏
Chambers, H. F. (2001). The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus. Emerging infectious diseases7(2), 178.‏
Chandran, A., AA, M. H., Varghese, S., & Sheeja, K. M. (2008). Prevalence of multiple drug resistant Escherichia coli serotypes in a tropical estuary, India. Microbes and environments23(2), 153-158.
Chen, H. Y., Hill, R. L., Kirk, M., Casewell, M. W., & Beighton, D. (2002). Differential antimicrobial susceptibility between human and chicken isolates of vancomycin-resistant and sensitive Enterococcus faeciumInternational journal of antimicrobial agents19(1), 39-46.‏
Chesneau, O., Morvan, A., & Solh, N. E. (2000). Retrospective screening for heterogeneous vancomycin resistance in diverse Staphylococcus aureus clones disseminated in French hospitals. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy45(6), 887-890.‏
Ciocîrlan, E. (2008). Research on incubation bacterial microflora.‏
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2012) Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, 9th edn. CLSI document M07-A9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2017) Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Tween-seventh Informational Supplement M100-S27.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2020) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 30th edn. CLSI supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA
Cong Y, Yang S, Rao, X.(2019). Vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: A review of case updating and clinical features. J Adv Res. 2020; 21: 169-176. DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.10.005.
Cortés, C. R., Isaías, G. T., Cuello, C. L., Flores, J. M. V., Anderson, R. C., & Campos, C. E. (2004). Bacterial isolation rate from fertile eggs, hatching eggs, and neonatal broilers with yolk sac infection. Revista latinoamericana de microbiologia46(1-2), 12-16.
 
Cuny, C.; Layer, F.; Strommenger, B.and Witte, W. (2011): Rare occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC130 with a novel mecA homologue in humans in Germany. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24360.
El-Ghany, W. A. A. (2021). Staphylococcus aureus in poultry, with special emphasis on methicillin-resistant strain infection: a comprehensive review from one health perspective.‏
El-Tawab, A., Ashraf, A., Hofy, F. I., Mohamed, S. R., & Amin, S. H. (2017). Characterization of Methicillin Resistance Staphylococcus aureus isolated from chicken and human. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal32(1), 132-137.‏
Emilia Ciocîrlan (2008): Research on the incubation bacterial microflora. Cercetări Agronomice În Moldova vol. XII, no. 2 (134).
Enemor, E. C., Ngwoke, K. G., Gugu, T. H., Oli, A. N., Eze, C. O., Ugwu, B. C., ... & Ugwu, M. C. (2015). Phytochemical analysis and antimicrobial activity of ethanolic stem extracts of Cnestisferruginea on multidrug resistant bacteria isolated from raw retail meat sold in Awka, Nigeria. Journal of Pharmaceu
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), 2011. Scientific Opinion on an update on the present knowledge on the occurrence and control of foodborne viruses. EFSA Journal9, 2190.
Fair, R. J., & Tor, Y. (2014). Antibiotics and bacterial resistance in the 21st century. Perspectives in medicinal chemistry6, PMC-S14459.‏
Feßler, A. T., Kadlec, K., Hassel, M., Hauschild, T., Eidam, C., Ehricht, R., ... & Schwarz, S. (2011). Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from food and food products of poultry origin in Germany. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.77(20), 7151-7157.‏
Fluit, A. C., Carpaij, N., Majoor, E. A., Bonten, M. J., & Willems, R. J. (2013). Shared reservoir of ccrB gene sequences between coagulase-negative staphylococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy68(8), 1707-1713.‏
Hanson, B. M., Dressler, A. E., Harper, A. L., Scheibel, R. P., Wardyn, S. E., Roberts, L. K., ... & Smith, T. C. (2011). Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on retail meat in Iowa. Journal of infection and public health4(4), 169-174.‏
Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PH, Staley JT, Williams ST (1994) Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 9th edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, NY, USA.
Hölzel, C. S., Schwaiger, K., Harms, K., Küchenhoff, H., Kunz, A., Meyer, K., ... & Bauer, J. (2010). Sewage sludge and liquid pig manure as possible sources of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Environmental Research110(4), 318-326.
Ijaz, M., Arshad, M., Hussain, M., & Iqbal, M. (1994). Studies on the prevalence of bacterial agents isolated from yolk of broiler chicks suffering from omphalitis. Animal Health and Production14, 51-54.‏
Iqbal, M., Shah, I., Ali, A., Khan, M., & Jan, S. (2006). Prevalence and in vitro antibiogram of bacteria associated with omphalitis in chicks. Proteus13(5), 8.‏
Jamali, H., Paydar, M., Radmehr, B., Ismail, S., & Dadrasnia, A. (2015). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw milk and dairy products. Food control54, 383-388.‏
Kariyama, R.; Mitsuhata, R.; Chow, J.W.; Clewell, D.B. and Kumon, H. (2000): Simple and reliable multiplex PCR assay for surveillance isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Journal of clinical microbiology, Aug. 2000, p. 3092–3095.
Khan, K. A., Khan, S. A., Aslam, A., Rabbani, M., & Tipu, M. Y. (2004). Factors contributing to yolk retention in poultry: a review. Pakistan Veterinary Journal24(1), 46-51.‏
Kiratisin, P., Apisarnthanarak, A., Laesripa, C., &Saifon, P. (2008). Molecular characterization and epidemiology of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates causing health care-associated infection in Thailand, where the CTX-M family is endemic. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy52(8), 2818-2824.‏
Lozano, C., Gharsa, H., Ben Slama, K., Zarazaga, M., & Torres, C. (2016). Staphylococcus aureus in animals and food: methicillin resistance, prevalence and population structure. A review in the African continent. Microorganisms4(1), 12.‏
Magiorakos, A. P., Srinivasan, A., Carey, R. B., Carmeli, Y., Falagas, M. E., Giske, C. G., ... & Monnet, D. L. (2012). Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clinical microbiology and infection18(3), 268-281.‏
Malik, H. A., yar Saleem, S., Hamza, M., Naseer, S., Usman, M., & Haseeb, M. B. (2023). Prevalence and antibiogram of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the fecal material of poultry in pakistan. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology30(17), 1857-1865.‏
McClure J-A, Conly JM, Lau V, Elsayed S, Louie T, Hutchins W, Zhang K. (2006): Novel multiplex PCR assay for detection of the staphylococcal virulence marker Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes and simultaneous discrimination of methicillin-susceptible from -resistant staphylococci. J ClinMicrobiol 44: 1141-114.
Momtaz, H., Dehkordi, F. S., Rahimi, E., Asgarifar, A., & Momeni, M. (2013). Virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from chicken meat in Isfahan province, Iran. Journal of Applied Poultry Research22(4), 913-921.‏
Naeim, D. E., Eldesoukey, I. E., Moawad, A. A., & Ahmed, A. M. (2023). Molecular detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from different foodstuffs in Egypt. In Veterinary Research Forum (Vol. 14, No. 5, p. 243). Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.‏
Nasrin, S., Islam, M. A., Khatun, M., Akhter, L., & Sultana, S. (2012). Characterization of bacteria associated with omphalitis in chicks.‏ The Bangladesh Veterinarian. 29(2): 63-68
Ogundare, A. O., & Ekundayo, F. O. (2016). Antibiotic Sensitivity Profile of Staphylococcus Species from Anatomical and Environmental Sites in the Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria. Biotechnology Journal International, 1-8.‏
Olayinka, B. O., Bala, H. K., Ehinmidu, J. O., & Onaolapo, J. A. (2010). Multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from poultry farms in Zaria, Nigeria. In 14th International Symposium on Staphylococci and Staphylococcal Infections (pp. 6-9).‏
Osman, K., Badr, J., Al-Maary, K. S., Moussa, I. M., Hessain, A. M., Girah, Z. M. A., ... & Saad, A. (2016). Prevalence of the antibiotic resistance genes in coagulase-positive-and negative-Staphylococcus in chicken meat retailed to consumers. Frontiers in microbiology7, 1846.‏
Otalu, O., Junaidu, K., Chukwudi, O. E., & Jarlath, U. V. (2011). Multi-drug resistant coagulase positive Staphylococcus aureus from live and slaughtered chickens in Zaria, Nigeria. International Journal of Poultry Science10(11), 871-875.‏
Patel, R.;.Uhl, J.R.; Kohner, P.; Hopkins, M.K. And Cockerill, F.R. (1997): Multiplex PCR Detection of vanA, vanB, vanC-1, and vanC-2/3 Genes in Enterococci. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, P. 703–707.
Pattison M, McMullin PF, Bradbury JM, Alexander DJ (2008). Poultry Disease. 6 th Edition, Saunders Elsevier, London, pp. 141-142.
Persoons, D., Van Hoorebeke, S., Hermans, K., Butaye, P., De Kruif, A., Haesebrouck, F. &Dewulf, J. (2009). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in poultry. Emerging infectious diseases15(3), 452.‏
Pyzik, E., Marek, A., & Hauschild, T. (2014). Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus aureus–like strains isolated from table eggs. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy58(1), 57-63.‏
Radu, S., Toosa, H., Rahim, R. A., Reezal, A., Ahmad, M., Hamid, A. N., ... &Nishibuchi, M. (2001). Occurrence of the vanA and vanC2/C3 genes in Enterococcus species isolated from poultry sources in Malaysia. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease39(3), 145-153.‏
Rasheed, B. (2011). Isolation and identification of bacteria causing arthritis in chickens. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences25(2), 93-95.‏
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual (No. Ed. 2). Cold spring harbor laboratory press.‏
Sato, G., Miura, S., Miyamae, T., Nakagawa, M., & Ito, A. (1961). Characters of staphylococci isolated from dead chick embryos and from pathological conditions in chickens. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research9(1), 1-13.‏
Shahjada, Z., Hussain, K., Islam, M. M., Majumder, S., Hasan, I., Rahman, M., & Saha, S. (2017). Bacteria causing omphalitis in newly hatched chicks from broiler and layer flocks and their antibiotic profiles. Int. J. Natl. Soc. Sci4(2), 73-81.‏
Sharada, R., Ruban, S. W., & Thiyageeswaran, M. (2009). Antibiotic resistance pattern of Escherichia coli isolated from poultry in Bangalore. Int J Microbiol7(1).‏
Sharma, V. K., Johnson, N., Cizmas, L., McDonald, T. J., & Kim, H. (2016). A review of the influence of treatment strategies on antibiotic resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes. Chemosphere150, 702-714.‏
Shlaes, D. M., & Projan, S. J. (2009). Antimicrobial resistance versus the discovery and development of new antimicrobials. In Antimicrobial drug resistance: Mechanisms of drug resistance (pp. 43-50). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.‏
Shokry MH, Bosila M, El-Ghany A, Wafaa A, Redwan IA, Amer MM (2018) Pathogenicity of coagulase negative Staphylococcus chicken isolates to 10 days old broiler chickens. Egypt J Vet Sci 4.
Silva V, Caniça M, Ferreira E, Vieira-Pinto M, Saraiva C, Pereira JE, Capelo JL, Igrejas G, Poeta P (2022) Multidrug-resistant methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci in healthy poultry slaughtered for human consumption. Antibiot 11:365.
Stapleton, P.D, Taylor, P.W. (2007) Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Science Progress. 85:57-72
Suleiman, A., Zaria, L. T., Grema, H. A., & Ahmadu, P. (2013). Antimicrobial resistant coagulase positive Staphylococcus aureus from chickens in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences11(1), 51-55.‏
Wada, M.; Lkhagvadorj, E.; Bian, L.; Wang, C.; Chiba, Y.; Nagata, S.; Shimizu, T.; Yamashiro, Y.; Asahara, T. and Nomoto, K. (2010): Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assay for the rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Applied Microbiology 108 (2010) 779–788.
Waldvogel F.A. (2000). Staphylococcus aureus. In:GL Mandell, RG Douglas & JE Bennett (ed.), Principles and practices of infectious disease, 3rd ed.Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
Warnes, S. L., Highmore, C. J., & Keevil, C. W. (2012). Horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes on abiotic touch surfaces: implications for public health. MBio3(6), e00489-12.
Waters, A. E., Contente-Cuomo, T., Buchhagen, J., Liu, C. M., Watson, L., Pearce, K., ... & Price, L. B. (2011). Multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in US meat and poultry. Clinical Infectious Diseases52(10), 1227-1230.‏
Wielders, C. L., Vriens, M. R., Brisse, S., de Graaf-Miltenburg, L. A., Troelstra, A., Fleer, A., ... & Fluit, A. C. (2002). In-vivo transfer of mecA DNA to Staphylococcus aureusLancet (London, England)357(9269), 1674-1675.‏
Wladyka, B., Dubin, G., & Dubin, A. (2011). Activation mechanism of thiol protease precursor from broiler chicken specific Staphylococcus aureus strain CH-91. Veterinary microbiology147(1-2), 195-199.‏
Yilmaz, M., & Seker, E. (2022). Investigation of mecA, vanA and pvl genes in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine mastitis in smallholder dairy farms. Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi33(1), 50-55.‏
Zaman, S. B., Sobur, M. A., Hossain, M. J., Pondit, A., Khatun, M. M., Choudhury, M. A., ... & Rahman, M. T. (2020). Molecular detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in ornamental birds having public health significance.
Zarfel, G., Galler, H., Luxner, J., Petternel, C., Reinthaler, F., Haas, D., ... &Feierl, G. (2010).Multiresistant bacteria isolated from chicken meat in Austria. International journal of environmental research and public health11(12), 12582-12593.