Role of acetic acid as antibacterial on E.coli isolated from young rabbits

Document Type : Original researches

Abstract

An investigation into the incidence of E. coli bacterial infections linked to outbreaks of rabbit diarrhea was carried out using a field survey. Ninety samples were recovered from   diseased  and freshly dead rabbits, suffering from diarrhea , from Kafrelsheikh governorate farms. Samples of fecal swabs and Internal organs, including the liver, spleen, and intestinal contents, were aseptically collected, and E. coli was isolated and identified by traditional method. E.coli was typed serologically and tested for antimicrobial agents. E.coli infection incidence rate was (66.6%). Moreover, the serologically identified of seven E. coli isolates were three O91, two O128 ,one O17 and  one O44 .All bacterial isolates were highly sensitive to Ciprofloxacin , Amikacin, and Fosfomycin by 100% , while tetracycline and streptomycin resistance was present in 90% and 40% of the strains, respectively. The isolates were screened for presence of cnf1 and tsh virulence genes, qnrA and tetA(A) antibiotic resistance genes .   Six weeks-old thirty healthy rabbits were used , fecal swabs were taken to make sure that rabbits free from  E.coli . Rabbits were divided into 5 groups (6 rabbits for each) ; Group 1 were  kept as negative control (without infection) , Group 2,3,4,5 were inoculated orally with 1 ml of culture (1x107 CFU/ml) , Group 2 were  kept as positive control (without treatment)and tested for the virulence by expermintal examination , Group 3 were treated with ciprofloxacin 2 days after infection for 5 successive days , Group 4 treated with acetic acid 2 days after infection for 5 successive days , while Group 5 were treated with ciprofloxacin  and acetic acid 2 days after infection for 5 successive days . All animals were kept for 21 days (period of observation) with daily examination for clinical signs, mortality rate and gross P.M. lesions in dead animals till the end of the observation period and trials of reisolation were conducted .
Aim of the work
The principal objective of the research was to find out the incidence of E. coli is in young rabbits in the Egyptian governorate of Kafrelsheikh. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was also used to investigate the presence of certain virulence and antibiotic resistance genes in the isolated E. coli strains. Acetic acid alone and acetic acid with antibiotic were used as trials for treatment of artificially infected rabbits with E.coli .

Keywords

Main Subjects


Role of acetic acid as antibacterial on E.coli isolated from young rabbits

 

Mayada A.M. Abou Zeid1 ,  Atef A. Salim2, Haneen A. Ghazy3

 1Bacteriology, Kafrelsheikh Regional Laboratory, Animal Health Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt

2 Poultry diseases, Kafrelsheikh Regional Laboratory, Animal Health Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt,

3 Biotechnology, Kafrelsheikh Regional Laboratory, Animal Health Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt 

 

ABSTRACT

An investigation into the incidence of E. coli bacterial infections linked to outbreaks of rabbit diarrhea was carried out using a field survey. Ninety samples were recovered from   diseased  and freshly dead rabbits, suffering from diarrhea , from Kafrelsheikh governorate farms. Samples of fecal swabs and Internal organs, including the liver, spleen, and intestinal contents, were aseptically collected, and E. coli was isolated and identified by traditional method. E.coli was typed serologically and tested for antimicrobial agents. E.coli infection incidence rate was (66.6%). Moreover, the serologically identified of seven E. coli isolates were three O91, two O128 ,one O17 and  one O44 .All bacterial isolates were highly sensitive to Ciprofloxacin , Amikacin, and Fosfomycin by 100% , while tetracycline and streptomycin resistance was present in 90% and 40% of the strains, respectively. The isolates were screened for presence of cnf1 and tsh virulence genes, qnrA and tetA(A) antibiotic resistance genes .   Six weeks-old thirty healthy rabbits were used , fecal swabs were taken to make sure that rabbits free from  E.coli . Rabbits were divided into 5 groups (6 rabbits for each) ; Group 1 were  kept as negative control (without infection) , Group 2,3,4,5 were inoculated orally with 1 ml of culture (1x107 CFU/ml) , Group 2 were  kept as positive control (without treatment)and tested for the virulence by expermintal examination , Group 3 were treated with ciprofloxacin 2 days after infection for 5 successive days , Group 4 treated with acetic acid 2 days after infection for 5 successive days , while Group 5 were treated with ciprofloxacin  and acetic acid 2 days after infection for 5 successive days . All animals were kept for 21 days (period of observation) with daily examination for clinical signs, mortality rate and gross P.M. lesions in dead animals till the end of the observation period and trials of reisolation were conducted .

Aim of the work

The principal objective of the research was to find out the incidence of E. coli is in young rabbits in the Egyptian governorate of Kafrelsheikh. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was also used to investigate the presence of certain virulence and antibiotic resistance genes in the isolated E. coli strains. Acetic acid alone and acetic acid with antibiotic were used as trials for treatment of artificially infected rabbits with E.coli .

Keywords: Ecoli , PCR, acetic acid, diarrhea,  diseased rabbits.

 

INTRODUCTION

    Since that rabbit meat has a high protein content, low fat content, and a delicious flavor, rabbits are crucial to the solution of the meat problem (Rashwan & Marai, 2000). The primary risk factor for gastrointestinal disorders is stress, and during the weaning phase of rabbits, diarrhea is one of the most common issues(Petrov et al., 2005). Serious issues with rabbit farming were encountered in Egypt, and illnesses that are costing this industry money are being closely monitored (Saif-Edin et al., 1994). Rabbit farming may be significantly impacted by diarrhea, a syndrome of digestive abnormalities in young rabbits that can result in secondary infections that lower immunity and increase newborn mortality (Chen et al., 2017). Currently, the primary cause of morbidity in growing rabbits is digestive disorders, which causes a sharp increase in the death rate in putting on weight rabbitries (Rosell et al., 2009). Five days after weaning,The digesting enzymes in pancreatic tissue are not very active. because of interactions with other factors that might increase the chance of diarrhea after weaning (Hedemann and Jensen 2004).An imbalanced diet is one of the key risk factors for infections that cause enteritis, which is spread by the fecal-oral route (Newton et al., 2004).Some virulence-associated genes have been acquired by certain serotypes of this bacteria, allowing them to induce extraintestinal or intestinal illness. Enteric-pathogenic strains of E. coli are commonly referred to as diarrheagenic strains, and their pathogenesis is linked to certain virulence characteristics that differ based on the pathotype  (Xia et al., 2010). Provence and Curtiss discovered the tsh gene recently, which codes for a temperature-sensitive hemagglutinin ( Provence & Curtiss, 1994). The most recent member of the autotransporter family IgA protease, which is present in many pathotypes of Shigella spp. And Escherichia coli., is the tsh protein. A bacterial virulence factor linked to extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli strains is called Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor 1 (CNF1).CNF1 toxin activity may exacerbate tissue damage and inflammation, according to studies ( Schreiber et al., 2017).Due to the fact that rabbits were more prone to intestinal illnesses after they were weaned, prolonged use of antibiotics during therapy might only increase microbial resistance in agricultural animals. As a result, a number of substitutes have been developed, including organic acids, probiotics, and herbal extracts (Eiben et al., 2008).The intestinal mucosa in young rabbits is an essential barrier against antigenic attack and is involved in nutrition absorption and digesting (Gallois et al., 2005). The use of organic acids is crucial, Although it is true that there is a dearth of scientific evidence and frequently conflicting information about how they affect the microflora population, mucosal immunity, and growth performance in rabbits (Falcão-e-Cunha et al., 2007). The organic acids play a direct action on the bacterial cell integrity (Maetrens et al., 2006).The antibacterial activity of acetic acid, which was traditionally diluted and used as vinegar, has probably been used for food preservation purposes longer than any other preservative due to its effects on food safety, wholesomeness, and quality. Because gut bacteria are kept from competing with the host for nutrients by organic acids, they are a reliable substitute for antibiotics in a rabbit's diet (Falcao-e-Cunha et al., 2007).

Material and methods

Examined rabbits

Ninety samples in total were gathered from  diseased & dead rabbits with a history of diarrhea.The samples were collected from different farms in Kafrelsheikh Governorate, clinically examined and put through a postmortem investigation in case of dead animals OIE (2015).

 Bacteriological examinations:

  • Isolation of coli.
  1. coliwas isolated from fecal sample and  internal organs( spleen,intestine and liver )  from diseased & freshly dead rabbits as stated by Quinn et al. (2002). then E. coli isolates were recognized morphologicaliy & biochemically based on MacFaddin (2000). Diagnosing E. coli isolates with fast diagnostic sets of antisera (DENKA SEIKEN Co., Japan), Kok et al. (1996) identified the isolates based on serological analysis.

 

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

The disc diffusion method was used to 10 E. coli bacterial isolates using commercially available antibiotic discs , the following antibiotic discs were used: Ciprofloxacin ( CIP )5ug, Amikacin ( AK ) 30ug, Tetracycline ( TE ) 30ug, Fosfomycin ( FO)200ug, Streptomycin ( S ) 10ug, Chioramphenicol (C ) 30ug, Neomycin ( N) 30ug and Gentamicin ( CN )10ug.  In compliance with the guidelines provided by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards  (NCCLS, 2007) ,then incubated at 37°C for a full day. The manufacturer's interpretation of the inhibitory zone was utilized to categorize isolates into groups that were either sensitive, intermediate, or resistant (CLSI, 2018).

The use of Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to identify certain virulence and antibiotic resistance genes in E. coli  isolates.

DNA extraction. Using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany, GmbH) and making certain adjustments based on the manufacturer's instructions, DNA was extracted from samples. In summary, 200 microliters of the sample suspension were treated for 10 minutes at 56 degrees Celsius with 10 microliters of proteinase K and 200 microliters of lysis buffer. Following the incubation period, the lysate was mixed with 200 µl of 100% ethanol. The manufacturer's instructions were then followed while washing and centrifuging the sample. The elution buffer contained in the kit was 100 µl., which was used to elute the nucleic acid.

Oligonucleotide Primer. The primers utilized were provided by Metabion (Germany) and are mentioned in table (1).

PCR amplification. A twenty five µl reaction was conducted using one microliter of each primer at a concentration of 20 pmol, along with 12.5 µl of EmeraldAmp Max PCR Master Mix (Takara, Japan) in addition to 5.5 µl of water., and 5 µl of DNA template. An Applied Biosystem 2720 heat cycler was used to carry out the process.

Analysis of the PCR Products.

The PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1.5% agarose gel (Applichem, Germany, GmbH) in 1x TBE buffer at room temperature using gradients of 5V/cm. Fifteen microliters (µl) of each gel analysis item were placed within each gel slot. A generuler 100 bp ladder (Fermentas, Germany) was used to measure the fragment sizes. Biometra's gel documentation system, Alpha Innotech, was utilized to capture images of the gel, and data analysis was done using software.

Table (1 ): Primers sequences, target genes, amplicon sizes and cycling conditions.

Target gene

Primers sequences

Amplified segment

(bp)

Primary

denaturation

35 cycles of amplification)

Final extension

Reference

Secondary denaturation

Annealing

Extension

 

 

tsh

GGT GGT GCA CTG GAG TGG

620

94˚C

5 min.

94˚C

30 sec.

54˚C

30 sec.

72˚C

30 sec.

72˚C

10 min.

(Delicato et al., 2003)

AGT CCA GCG TGA TAG TGG

cnf1

TATATAGTCGTCAAGATGGA

620

94˚C

5 min.

94˚C

30 sec.

63˚C

45 sec.

72˚C

30 sec.

72˚C

7 min.

(Kadhum et al., 2008)

CACTAAGCTTTACAATATTGAC

tetA(A)

GGTTCACTCGAACGACGTCA

  570

94˚C

5 min.

94˚C

30 sec.

50˚C

40 sec.

72˚C

45 sec.

72˚C

10 min.

(Randall et al., 2004)

CTGTCCGACAAGTTGCATGA

qnrA

ATTTCTCACGCCAGGATTTG

516

94˚C

5 min.

94˚C

30 sec.

55˚C

40 sec.

72˚C

45 sec.

72˚C

10 min.

(Robicsek et al., 2006)

GATCGGCAAAGGTTAGGTCA

 

Experimental design:-

Preparation of E. coli infective dose :

   For experimental infection , 30 healthy rabbits of 6 weeks-old were used ,the bacterial isolate  was adjusted by normal saline to a concentration of 1x107CFU/ml  (  Skřivanová and  Marounek , 2007)   McFarland and used for this experiment. The rabbits were housed in cages and monitored for a week in order to assess their adaptability, fecal swabs were taken to make sure that rabbits free from  E.coli ,then divided into 5 groups(6 rabbits)  : Group 1 were  kept as control negative (without infection) , Group 2 were inoculated orally with 1 ml of culture (1x107 CFU/ml) kept as positive control (without treatment), Group 3 were inoculated orally with 1 ml of culture (1x107 CFU/ml) and treated with ciprofloxacin two days following infection for five days in a row , Group 4  were inoculated orally with 1 ml of culture (1x107 CFU/ml) and treated with acetic acid Brand Chemicals (60% )1ml /litre in drinking water 2 days after infection for 5 successive days , while Group 5 were inoculated orally with 1 ml of culture (1x107 CFU/ml)  and treated with ciprofloxacin  and acetic acid 1ml /litre in drinking water 2 days after infection for 5 successive days . For a duration of 21 days, all animals were kept under observation. During this time, reisolation trials were carried out and daily checks were made for clinical symptoms, the mortality rate, and gross P.M. lesions in dead animals

Results

Incidence of E.coli  infection in rabbits:

A total of 90 rabbit samples were recovered from  diseased & freshly dead rabbits from Kafrelsheikh governorate farms.Samples of fecal swabs & internal organs (liver, spleen and intestinal contents) , yielded 60 E.coli positive samples with percent of 66.6 as shown in Table (2).

Table( 2 ) : Incidence of E.coli:

 

Samples

 

No. of +ve samples

 

Percentage %

 

90

 

 

60

 

66.6

 

Table( 3 ) : Identification of E. coli via serology

E. coli Serotype

No. of Strains

O91

three

O17

one

O128

two

O44

One

Total

seven

Table ( 4). Antimicrobial susceptibility test for E.coli  isolates (no=10)

Antimicrobial agent

Sensitive

Intermediate

Resistant

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

 

Ciprofloxacin ( CIP )

 

 

10

 

100

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

Amikacin ( AK )

 

 

10

 

100

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

Fosfomycin ( FO)

 

 

10

 

100

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

Neomycin ( N)

 

 

9

 

90

 

-

 

-

 

1

 

10

 

Gentamicin ( CN )

 

 

9

 

90

 

-

 

-

 

1

 

10

 

Chioramphenicol (C )

 

 

9

 

90

 

-

 

-

 

1

 

10

 

Streptomycin ( S )

 

 

 

4

 

40

 

2

 

20

 

4

 

40

 

Tetracycline (TE)

 

 

-

 

-

 

1

 

10

 

9

 

90

 

 

 

 

Table( 5 ): Incidence of E.coli some virulence genes and antibiotic resistance genes in some isolates

 

No.of isolates

cnf1

tsh

qnrA

tetA(A)

1(O91)

-

+

+

+

2(O17)

+

+

+

-

3(O128)

-

+

+

+

4(O91)

-

+

+

-

5(O91)

+

+

+

+

6(O44)

-

-

+

+

7(O128)

-

+

+

+

Total%

2(28.5%)

6(85.7%)

7(100%)

5(71.4%)

 

 

Fig ( 1 ):PCR result for the virulence gene cnf1 on an agarose gel electrophoresis .

Lanes  2and 5: cnf1 gene positivity with 620 bp band.

 

 

 

Fig ( 2 ):tsh virulence gene agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR result.

Lanes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5and 7: tsh gene positive with 620 bp band.

 

 

Fig ( 3 ):PCR results for the antibiotic resistance genes qnrA and tetA(A) on an agarose gel electrophoresis.

Lanes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7: qnrA gene positivity with a 516 bp band.

 

Lanes 1, 3, 5, 6 and 7: tetA(A)gene positive with 570 bp band.

 

Experimentally infected rabbits with E. coli clinical signs and postmortem lesions.

Clinical signs :

   The animals in all infected groups showed decrease in food intake , emaciation , apathy, fever , diarrhea or pasty feces with frequent urination . increase water intake and decrease body gain (as shown in figure 4). The severity of symptoms were reduced in group 5 (infected ,treated with acetic acid & ciprofloxacin ) , than group 3  ( infected &treated with ciprofloxacin ) , than group 4 (infected &treated with acetic acid ),than in group 2 (positive control) where the symptoms were sever , the symptoms reduced gradually and disappeared  nearly at 14 day post infection in all groups  

Fecal swabs

Fecal swabs were taken from four infected groups (group 2, group 3, group4 and group5) after one day of oral inoculation indicated fecal shedding of the E.coli and from diarrhea which  started from day 2 of infection and stopped at day 7

 

 

postmortem lesions :

   Postmortem lesions of infected rabbits in all infected groups were taken at 7day of infection by slautaring 2 rabbits from each group& reisolation of E.coli from internal organs of experimentally infected rabbits were done . The infected rabbits in all infected groups showed congested enlarged liver , enlarged gall bladder,  congested heart , congested lungs , congested spleen and intestine which filled                     with gases and watery content (as shown in figure 5).  

 

 

Discussions

Incidence of Ecoli infection in rabbit Samples

The data illustrated in table ( 2 ) clarified that the numbers of positive samples of  E. coli from rabbit fecal swabes gathered from sick and internal organs from freshly dead rabbits in different localities at Kafrelsheikh governorate (Egypt). E. coli was found in 60 samples in a total percentage of 66.6%. These results resembled to Alton et al. (2013) who, at a rate of 61%, isolated E. coli from  fecal samples obtained from adult 141 New Zealand white rabbits  ,Sawsan, (2012) who isolated it in a percentage of 64% from freshly dead rabbits. However, we achieved higher results than it was acquired by Saif-Eldin et al., (1994) who recorded E. coli isolation by 54% from Rabbits with diarrhea that were 4–8 weeks old had a 70–78% death rate,.Also, El-Masry& Tamam., (2021) who isolated 54% of the E. coli from diarrheal rabbit fecal samples in different parts of the Egyptian governorates of Cairo, Giza, and Qalubia.Season variation, sample type, and the use of hygienic procedures on the farm could all be contributing factors to the difference in the results.

Serelogical idetification

Rabbit diarrhea is caused by highly pathogenic strains that may be quickly identified using O serogrouping and biotyping. These strains fall into 12 different biotypes (Pisoni et al., 2004).Serotyping of E. coli isolates as displayed in table ( 3,5 ) indicated that 7 isolates of E. coli were serologically categorized into (three O91, two O128 ,one O17 and  one O44 E. coli). Different serotypes were reported in rabbit by others as O111, O114 and O125  Scaletsky et al. (1984), Shahin et al. (2011) discovered that the most common E. coli serotypes in rabbits were O44 and O158,.Also O78 , O125 , O152 , O158 , O114 , O115 & O168 serotypes were detected  in rabbit by Aboelhadid et al. (2022)  . The variations in E. Coli serotypes from various sources could be the cause of the difference in the results . Luo et al. (2023) demonstrated that strains from several farms in the same area had different serotypes, and it's likely that other farms had the same strains.

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

Testing for susceptibility in vitro revealed that the isolates of E. coli were extremely sensitive to Ciprofloxacin ,Amikacin and Fosfomycin by 100% , while the strains were 90 % resistant to Tetracycline and 40% to Streptomycin table ( 4 ),analogous findind were detected by Sakr et al. (2019)  who showed that antimicrobial sensitivity of isolated E. coli showed the highest sensitivity to Gentamycin 88.57% and Streptomycin 65.71% but different results were obtained by Aboelhadid et al. (2022) who declared that the isolates showed total resistance to neomycin (100%), and high resistance to the majority of the tested antimicrobials,considerable sensitivity to amikacin (40%) and ciprofloxacin (43.3%) was observed.

Prevalence of some Virulence & antibiotic resistance genes of    E. coli isolates          

The virulence genes of E. coli, such as those that encode adhesion, pathogecity islands, and outer membrane proteins, are linked to the bacteria's pathogenicity.Many E. coli virulence genes interact with one another during invasion to allow the bacteria to break free and destroy the host defense system, which triggers an inflammatory reaction in the host (Ugwu et al., 2020) .

 The current investigation used the pcr approach table (5), fig (1, 2, 3) to screen E. coli isolates for the presence of the virulence genes cnf1 and tsh  moreover, the antibiotic resistance genes qnrA and tetA(A).

A protein toxin called Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor 1 (Cnf1) which can induce necrosis in rabbit skin and multinucleation (cytotoxicity) in cultured cells (Wu et al., 2007). Our results showed that two isolates only having cnf1 with carrying rate of 28.5% , these findings conflict with (Sakr et al.,2019) who discovered no E. coli serotype from rabbits had cnf1  in it.

Tsh is an autotransporter of serine protease from E. Coli (Goudarztalejerdi et al., 2020) demonstrating that the sickness was mostly caused by the strains' ability to adhere, use transport systems, or activate enzymes. And it was noted that this gene contributed to the clones' development of multidrug resistance (Dhanji et al., 2011). Our study showed that six isolates having tsh with carrying rate of 85.7% this comes in agreement with a study showed that tsh was found in all E.coli isolates (Saad Eldin & Reda , 2016). A lower finding was noted by Huynh et al. (2021) who showed that tsh found in E. coli strains of rabbits by 57.14%

The qnrA is antibiotic resistance gene, it is the first identified plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance gene that encodes DNA gyrase protection protein so increasing prevalence will increase resistance (Wu et al., 2007). Our result clarified that the seven E.coli isolates carried qnrA gene with a carrying percent 100 The result was greater than Zhao et al. (2018) who provide that  the quinolone-resistance genes, qnrS were presented by (5.5%) and Qing et al. (2006) who detected qnrS by (59.8%).

It was reported that tetA gene display phenotypic resistance to tetracycline antibiotic (Pereira et al., 2020)  and this come in agreement with our study which showed  that 5 isolates carried the gene with a carrying rate 71.4% and invitro resistance for tetracyclines by 90% .

Experimental infection :

   The signs and postmortem lesions of infection appeared in all infected groups but the severity of signs and postmortem lesions were reduced in group 5 (infected ,treated with acetic acid & ciprofloxacin ) , than group 3  ( infected &treated with ciprofloxacin ) , than group 4 (infected &treated with acetic acid ),than in group 2 (positive control) where the symptoms were sever

Clinical signs :

   The animals in all infected groups showed decrease in food intake , emaciation , apathy, fever ,diarrhea or pasty feces with frequent urination ,increase water intake and decrease body gain fig (4) . These symptoms almost identical to that found by Coussement et al. (1984) ,
Ismail
et al.(2017) , Lateef et al.(2018 ) , SKRYPKA et al. ( 2020) ,  while  Mohamed et al.(2019)
mentioned mild watery diarrhea and abdominal distension

Postmortem lesions :

   Postmortem lesions of infected rabbits, in all infected groups, showed congested enlarged liver , enlarged gall bladder,  congested heart , congested lungs , congested spleen and intestine which filled with gases and watery content fig (5) .We found similar results in this investigation to that recorded by Lateef et al .(2018 ), they mentioned enlargement and congestins of visceral organs,while Coussement et al. (1984) mentioned thal the intestinal content was watery and yelwish ,   Saravia et al. (2017) who showed pale liver , distended bladder .hypremic lungs with frothy material, Blanco et al.(1997) who observed ceacal edema with light brown cecal content with some haemorrhages in ceacal mucosa

Beneficial effect of acetic acid on rabbits

    In this study the use of acetic acid to minimize effect of colibacillosis in rabbits alone or with suitable antibiotic was obvious ingroup 5 and group 4 which may agreed with Skřivanová and Marounek, (2002)  who reported the antimicrobial activity of organic acids in rabbits , Cardinali et al.( 2008) who stated that in experimentally infected rabbits, organic acids lessen the harm that both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria can inflict. while Hollister et al., 1990; Scapinello et al.(2001) reported no effect  of organic acid were recorded.  Dietary acidifiers can actually emerge as the most well-liked and successful substitute for antibiotics to be able help improve the rabbits' development and overall health  because of acetic acid has the potential to act as an antibacterial because it can lower stomach pH, which reduces the survival of E. coli through the stomach.

Conclusions

The data collected demonstrated that diarrhea related to enteritis is regarded as a serious health and economic risk factor in rabbit farms. For rabbits, the weaning age is a brief, stressful time that may be linked to an overgrowth of harmful bacteria in the intestine. Stricter sanitary and preventive measures are needed in the rabbit farming business due to the high level of E. coli isolation in the studied rabbits. Moreover, PCR and serotyping are regarded as quick and accurate diagnostic methods for identifying E. coli. The isolates of E. Coli were 100% susceptible to Ciprofloxacin, Amikacin, and Fosfomycin. In addition,   the presence of antibiotic resistant genes qnrA and tetA(A) indicated that antibiotic use in rabbit farms should to be done so carefully. When using acetic acid (1ml /litre) in drinking water  in conjunction with the right antibiotics it can help in treatment of colibacllosis infections in rabbits.There is a growing inclination towards using organic acids as a viable substitute for antibiotics to enhance the health condition and growth efficiency of rabbits.

Aboelhadid, S. M., Hashem, S. A., Abdel-Kafy, E.-S. M., Abdel-Baki, A.-A. S., Al-Quraishy, S., Abed, A. H., & Kamel, A. A. (2022). Prevalence and antimicrobial sensitivity of Escherichia coli and Salmonella species in field cases of rabbit intestinal coccidiosis treated with prebiotic. Austral Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 54(1), 9–16.
Alton, G.S., Ellen, M.B., Carolyn, M.M, Charles, P.B., Rachel, S.D., Loretta, R., Nicola, M.A.P.& James, G.F.(2013). Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Prevalence in Laboratory Rabbits. Vet. Microbiol. 163(3-4): 395– 398.
Blanco, J. E., Blanco, M., Blanco, J., Mora, A., Balaguer, L., Cuervo, L., ... & Muñoa, F. (1997). Prevalence and characteristics of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli with the eae gene in diarrhoeic rabbits. Microbiology and immunology41(2), 77-82.‏
Cardinali, R., Rebollar, P., Dal Bosco, A., Cagiola, M., Moscati, L., Forti, K., Mazzone, P., Scicutella, N., Rutili, D., & Mugnai, C. (2008). Effect of dietary supplementation of organic acids and essential oils on immune function and intestinal characteristics of experimentally infected rabbits. 573–578.
Chen, Y., Zhao, B., Wu, Y., Hu, S., Mu, L., Zhu, C., Pan, Y., & Wu, X. (2017). Impacts of diarrhea on the immune system, intestinal environment, and expression of PGRPs in New Zealand rabbits. PeerJ, 5, e4100.
CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute).( 2018). Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard—10th ed. M07-A11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
Coussement, W., Ducatelle, R., Charlier, G., Okerman, L., & Hoorens, J. (1984). Pathology of experimental colibacillosis in rabbits. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin Reihe B31(1‐10), 64-72.‏
Delicato, E. R., de Brito, B. G., Gaziri, L. C. J., & Vidotto, M. C. (2003). Virulence-associated genes in Escherichia coli isolates from poultry with colibacillosis. Veterinary Microbiology, 94(2), 97–103.
Dhanji, H., Doumith, M., Rooney, P. J., O’Leary, M. C., Loughrey, A. C., Hope, R., Woodford, N., & Livermore, D. M. (2011). Molecular epidemiology of fluoroquinolone-resistant ST131 Escherichia coli producing CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases in nursing homes in Belfast, UK. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 66(2), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkq463
Eiben, C., Gippert, T., Gódor-Surmann, K., & Kustos, K. (2008). Feed additives as they affect the fattening performance of rabbits. 625–630.
El-Masry, S. S., & Tamam, A. (2021). Isolation of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and their Specific Phages from Rabbits. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology, 12(3), 49–54.
Falcão-e-Cunha, L., Castro-Solla, L., Maertens, L., Marounek, M., Pinheiro, V., Freire, J., & Mourão, J. L. (2007). Alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in rabbit feeding: A review. World Rabbit Science, 15(3).
Gallois, M., Gidenne, T., Fortun-Lamothe, L., Le Huerou-Luron, I., & Lallès, J.-P. (2005). An early stimulation of solid feed intake slightly influences the morphological gut maturation in the rabbit. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 45(1), 109–122.
Goudarztalejerdi, A., Mohammadzadeh, A., Najafi, S. V., Nargesi, F., & Joudari, S. (2020). Serogrouping, phylotyping, and virulence genotyping of commensal and avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from broilers in Hamedan, Iran. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 73, 101558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101558
Hedemann, M. S. and Jensen, B. B. (2004). Variations in enzyme activity in stomach and pancreatic tissue and digest in piglets around weaning. Arch. Anim. Nutr.; 58 (1):47-59.
Hollister, A., Cheeke, P., Robinson, K., & Patton, N. (1990). Effects of dietary probiotics and acidifiers on performance of weanling rabbits. Journal of Applied Rabbit Research, 13(1), 6–9.
Huynh, V. C , Le, T. L. P. & Dang T. L. (2021). Serotypes, toxins and antibiotic resistance of escherichia coli (E. coli) strains isolated from diarrheic rabbits in phu vang, thua thien hue. Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 9(5), 610-617.
Ismail, A., Abdien, H., Hamed, D., & El Feil, W. M. (2017). Prevalence of some Enteric Bacterial Infections Causing Rabbit Enteritis and Attempts to Control Rabbit Coli Enteritis with Phytobiotics. Zagazig Veterinary Journal, 45(Supplementary 1), 91–101.
Kadhum, H., Finlay, D., Rowe, M., Wilson, I., & Ball, H. (2008). Occurrence and characteristics of cytotoxic necrotizing factors, cytolethal distending toxins and other virulence factors in Escherichia coli from human blood and faecal samples. Epidemiology & Infection, 136(6), 752–760.
Kok, T.; Worswich, D. and Gowans, E. (1996). Some serological techniques for microbial and viral infections. In Practical Medical Microbiology (Collee, J.; Fraser, A.; Marmion, B. and Simmons, A., eds.), 14th ed., Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, UK.
Lateef, A. N., Hammadi, K. M., & Mohammed, A. J. (2018). Clinical and pathological study of rabbits experimentally infected with E. coli O157: H7 isolated from human. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies6(1), 1487-1492.‏
Luo, S., Liao, C., Peng, J., Tao, S., Zhang, T., Dai, Y., ... & Ma, Y. (2023). Resistance and virulence gene analysis and molecular typing of Escherichia coli from duck farms in Zhanjiang, China. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 13, 1202013.‏
MacFaddin, J. F. (2000).Biochemical tests for identification medical bacteria. Warery Press Inc, Baltimore, Md. 21202 USA.
Maetrens, L., FALCAO-E-CUNHA, L., & MAROUNEK, M. (2006). 4.6. Feed additives to reduce the use of antibiotics. Recent Advances in Rabbit Sciences, 259.
Mohamed, F. M., El Hendy, A. H., & El Shehedi, M. A. (2019). Weanling Rabbit Mortalities Caused by Enteropathogenic Bacteria: Bacteriological and Pathological Investigation. Journal of Applied Veterinary Sciences4(1), 18-29.‏
NCCLS. (2007). "performance standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; fifteenth Informational Supplement According to CLSI. CLSI document M100-s15." In CLSI, document M100- s15., edited by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory standard. Clinical Laboratory standard Institue, Wayne
NEWTON, H. J.; SLOAN, J.; BENNETT-WOOD, V.; ADAMS, L. M.; ROBINS-BROWNE, R. M. AND HARRTLAND, E. L. .(2004). Contribution of long polar fimbriae to the virulence of rabbit-specific entropathogenic E. coli. Infect. Immun. 72 (3):12301239.
OIE. (2015). "Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals." In. Rome, Italy: OIE.
Pereira, R. V., Foditsch, C., Siler, J. D., Dulièpre, S. C., Altier, C., Garzon, A., & Warnick, L. D. (2020). Genotypic antimicrobial resistance characterization of E. coli from dairy calves at high risk of respiratory disease administered enrofloxacin or tulathromycin. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76232-w
Petrov, V., Lyutskanov, M., Vachkov, A., Tsachev, I., Mihaylov, G., & Tanchev, S. (2005). EXPERIMENTAL E. COLI (EPEC) INFECTION IN RABBITS-CLINICAL AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES AND ATTEMPT TO CONTROL WITH AN PHYTOBIOTIC. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 3(2), 50–55.
Pisoni, A., Piccirillo, A., Gallazzi, D., Agnoletti, F., & Grilli, G. (2004). Biotype and susceptibility to antimicrobial agents of rabbit Escherichia coli. 7–10.
Provence, D. L., and R. Curtiss III. 1994. Isolation and characterization of a gene involved in hemagglutination by an avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strain. Infect. Immun. 62:1369–1380
Qing F. K., G. Yi, H. Y. Ze et al.(2006). Detection of quinolone resistance and plasmid mediated quinolone gene in Escherichia coliisolated from rabbit,” Chinese Journal of Preventive VeterinaryMedicine, vol.38,pp944-948,2006.
Quinn P, Markey B, Carter M, et al.(2002). Veterinary Microbiology and Bacterial Disease. London: Black Well Science; 2002:1–648.
Randall, L., Cooles, S., Osborn, M., Piddock, L., & Woodward, M. J. (2004). Antibiotic resistance genes, integrons and multiple antibiotic resistance in thirty-five serotypes of Salmonella enterica isolated from humans and animals in the UK. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 53(2), 208–216.
Rashwan, A., & Marai, I. (2000). Mortality in young rabbits: A review. World Rabbit Science, 8(3), 111–124.
Robicsek, A., Strahilevitz, J., Jacoby, G. A., Macielag, M., Abbanat, D., Hye Park, C., Bush, K., & Hooper, D. C. (2006). Fluoroquinolone-modifying enzyme: A new adaptation of a common aminoglycoside acetyltransferase. Nature Medicine, 12(1), 83–88.
Rosell, J. M.; de la Fuente, L.F.; Badiola, J. I.; Fernández de Luco, D.; Casal, J. and Saco, M. (2009). Study of urgent visits to commercial rabbit farms in Spain and Portugal during 1997-2007. World Rabbit Sci., 17: 127-136.
Saad Eldin, W. F., & Reda, L. M. (2016). Prevalence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in suckling rabbits. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research64(Supplement 2), S149-S153.‏
Saif-Edin, M., Soliman, A., & AI, M. (1994). Prevalence and pathogenicity of enterobacteriacae in rabbits. 94–99.
Sakr, M. M., Ebied, S. K., & Ibrahim, M. S. (2019). Detection of Diarrheagenic Escherichia Coli in Rabbits. Alexandria Journal for Veterinary Sciences, 62(1).
Saravia, M., Segovia, C., Valderrama, K., & Santander, J. (2017). Colibacillosis in a New Zealand white rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries11(02), 203-206.‏
Sawsan (2012). Studies on some pathogenic bacteria causing mortality in young rabbits and study the effect of honey on these bacteria in vitro. Alex. J. Vet. Sci. 36(1): 149-162.
Scaletsky, I., Silva, M., & Trabulsi, L. R. (1984). Distinctive patterns of adherence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to HeLa cells. Infection and Immunity, 45(2), 534–536.
Scapinello, C., Faria, H. G. de, Furlan, A. C., & Michelan, A. C. (2001). Efeito da utilização de oligossacarídeo manose e acidificantes sobre o desempenho de coelhos em crescimento. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 30, 1272–1277.
Schreiber, H. L. et al.(2017). Bacterial virulence phenotypes of Escherichia coli and host susceptibility determine risk for urinary tract infections. Sci Transl Med 9, (2017).
Shahin, A., Lebdah, M., & Ali, G. (2011). Escherichia coli as an etiological agent of mucoid enteropathy in rabbits. Researcher, 3(7), 8–16.
Skřivanová, E., & Marounek, M. (2007). Influence of pH on antimicrobial activity of organic acids against rabbit enteropathogenic strain of Escherichia coliFolia Microbiologica52(1), 70-72.‏
Skřivanová, V., & Marounek, M. (2002). Effects of caprylic acid on performance and mortality of growing rabbits. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 71(4), 435–439.
Skrypka, M., TUL, O., & KYRYCHKO, B. (2020). Pathomorphological Changes in Organs of Rabbits with Experimental Colibacillosis. Bulletin of the University of Agricultural Sciences & Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Horticulture, 77(2).
Ugwu, I. C., Lee-Ching, L., Ugwu, C., Chah, K., & Okoye, J. O. A. (2020). Virulence-associated genes of avian pathogenic E. coli isolated from chickens with colibacillosis in Enugu State, Nigeria. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 101, 541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1404.
Wu, J.-J., Ko, W.-C., Tsai, S.-H., & Yan, J.-J. (2007). Prevalence of Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance Determinants QnrA, QnrB, and QnrS among Clinical Isolates of Enterobacter cloacae in a Taiwanese Hospital. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 51(4), 1223–1227. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01195-06
Xia, X., Meng, J., McDermott, P. F., Ayers, S., Blickenstaff, K., Tran, T.-T., Abbott, J., Zheng, J., & Zhao, S. (2010). Presence and characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and other potentially diarrheagenic E. coli strains in retail meats. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76(6), 1709–1717.
Zhao, X., Yang, J., Ju, Z., Chang, W., & Sun, S. (2018). Molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli from rabbit farms in Tai’an, China. BioMed Research International, 2018.