Document Type : Reviews articles
Abstract
Keywords
Main Subjects
Mastitis caused by methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
Hala Saleh*, Heba Farhan* and Amira Mohamed** Yasser Hana*, Halla, A. El Said. **
Bacteriology Dept., Animal Health Research Institute, Dokki. **Bacteriology Dept., *
AHRI, Zagazig.
Mastitis is one of the most common diseases in dairy cattle and cause great economic loss to the dairy industry’, this study will shine a spotlight on Staphylococcus aureus isolates with particular reference to MRSA strains from milk of mastitic cows, as well as its in-vitro antimicrobial sensitivity. And biochemical blood changes. Our result indicates that out of 300 samples of quarter milk from cows showing signs of mastitis, 50 blood samples from mastitic cows and 10 blood samples from apparently healthy contact cows in Giza Provence; the results show that S. aureus was isolated from 100/300 samples with an incidence of 33.3%. of which 36/100 strains are Antibiotic resistant to at least one antibiotic was obtained through the results of antibiotic sensitivity tests. 10/100 strains of S. aureus were multi-drug resistant to more than three Antibiotics. 8/100 of strains are confirmed methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by Vitek 2 Compact System's declaration and the presence of the resistance MecA gene in MRSA strains was confirmed by PCR results. Significant increases in WBCs, neutrophils, lymphocytes, malondialdehyde, total protein, and globulin, AST, ALT, and ALP are also caused by mastitis. Mastitis also causes a significant decrease in RBCs, Hb, PCV percent albumin/globulin (A/G ratio), catalase, and super oxide dismutase. It is possible to draw the conclusion that mastitis has a negative impact on the hemogram, liver, and kidney functions of cattle in a number of ways.
Introduction
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the leading sources of intra-mammary infections in dairy cows (Dufour et al.,2012; Zecconi and Scali, 2013). It is reported that 10–40% of the mastitis cases are caused by S. aureus (Kateete et al., 2013; Basanisi et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2017). Mastitis is a global challenge that it can result in financial losses for the dairy industry and the economy due to the substandard quality of milk, treatment costs, and causing subsequent new infection of other cows (Schroeder, 2012).
Contaminated raw milk at farm level, may lead to subsequent problems further along the food chain giving rise to S. Aureus associated food contamination (Jakobsen et al., 2011; Rola et al.,2016).
Nowadays antibiotics are widely used in feed to promote growth in animals which led to Antibiotic resistance in bacteria the main issues affecting public health (Oniciuc et al., 2017).
Due to a modified penicillin binding protein (PBP 2a) with decreasing affinity for beta lactams, the resistance to methicillin and other beta lactams was caused. The staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) contains the mecA gene, which encodes this protein (Paterson et al., 2014). Since MRSA is the primary pathogen in livestock animals that can infect humans, it has become a major public health concern (Doulgeraki et al.,2017 Nam et al., 2011). which first revealed in 2012 that the bacteria were isolated from dairy cows (Paterson et al., 2012).
Because it can spread methicillin resistance to people through milk or food, MRSA is extremely important for public health. (Lozano et al. 2016; Tenhagen et al., 2018).
This study sought to evaluate some S. aureus and antibiotic resistance factors found in raw mastitic milk samples and obtained through bacteriological and molecular methods with regard to MRSA strains. The following procedures were therefore planned as S. aureus isolation from raw milk samples in order to fulfill the study's objectives. Isolate identification through biochemistry. Isolates of S. aureus were tested for antibiogram. Antibiotic resistant strains are identified using the conventional diffusion method, which conforms to the VITEK® 2 compact system, and is followed by the detection of MRSA strains using PCR by detecting resistance genes in tested isolates in addition to effect mastitis hematobiochemical parameters.
3-Material and Method
A total of 300 samples of mastitic cow milk (quarter milk sample) and 50 blood samples of mastitic cow were collected, 10 blood samples from apparently healthy contact cows.2 blood sample of each cow. To obtain clear serum for the estimation of serum hematobiochemical parameters sample was taken in a centrifuge tube but blood samples for RBCs, Hb, PCV, were taken in tubes containing EDTA, At the Giza Governorate, samples were taken from individual households and farms. Immediately after collection, samples were transported in an ice box to the lab for bacteriological analysis.
Isolation and identification of S. aureus.
Milk samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes to isolate S. aureus, after which the sediments were cultured on Baird-Parker agar (BPA) and Mannitol salt agar (MSA) (Oxoid, England) and were incubated at 37°C in an aerobically for 24-48 hours. The morphological characteristics, Gram-staining, coagulase test, and catalase test results helped identify the isolates as S. aureus (APHA, 1992).
Identifying some S. aureus isolate virulence factors.
The formation of biofilms and hemolytic activity in S. aureus isolates were all examined in this study. Based on Boerlin et al.'s explanation, (2003). hemolytic activity was measured. According to Buxton (2005
The Congo red agar (CRA) test, as described by Freeman et al. (1989)., was used to assess the isolates' capacity for biofilm formation and the growth of rough, black colonies point to slime forming strains
testing the susceptibility of S. aureus isolates to various antibiotics.
Oxacillin (ox)(1ug) Penicillin (p) (10 ug) Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (A/c) (30ug) Erythromycin (E) (15 ug), gentamicin (GN) (10 ug), ciprofloxacin (CIP) (5 ug), tetracycline (TE) (30 ug), chloramphenicol (C) (30 ug) and Vancomycin (V) (30 ug) were tested against S. aureus isolates using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method (Oxoid, UK). An aliquot of each tested isolate's suspension (0.5 McFarland) was spread plated onto Mueller-Hinton agar and the inoculated plate was then incubated for 24 hours under aerobic conditions at 37°C. The diameters of the inhibition zones were then measured and interpreted in accordance with CLSI (2017). MDR was defined by Dai et al., (2019) as resistance to three or more antibiotics. The more recent VITEK 2 Compact method, which is used in low to middle-level clinical laboratories, was used to further identify isolates and determine their antibiotic sensitivity. The 21 CFR 11 compliance and a colorimetric reagent card (BCL) for identifying spore-forming Gram-positive bacilli like Bacillus and related species are features for industrial microbiology. The other BCLs (YST, GN, and GP) were used in all system formats for clinical and industrial applications.
Molecular identification of some antibiotic resistance and virulence Factors in some MRSA isolates:
All of the examined MRSA isolates (n=10) were genotypically identified as S. aureus through identification of the 16s rRNA gene of S. aureus, as shown in Fig. (1) In addition, it was discovered that all of the MRSA isolates under examination carry (80%) of them have the mecA gene Figs. (2). The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of the MRSA isolates under investigation were compiled in Table (4)
(Table 1) Target genes in the study, primers sequences and PCR conditions used:
Target gene |
Primers sequences (5`- 3`) |
Produ ct Size (bp) |
PCR conditions |
Reference |
||||
Primary denaturation |
Number of PCR cycles |
Final extension |
||||||
Denaturation |
Annealing |
Extension |
||||||
16srRN A |
GGA CGA CAT TAG ACG AAT CA |
1318 |
94˚C 2 min. |
35 cycles |
72˚C 10 min. |
Riffon et al. (2001) |
||
CGG GCA CCT ATT TTC TAT CT |
94˚C 45 sec. |
64˚C 1 min. |
72˚C 2 min. |
|||||
mecA |
AGAAGATGGTATGTGGAAGTT AG |
583 |
94˚C 5 min. |
40 cycles |
72˚C 5 min. |
Azimian et al. (2012) |
||
ATGTATGTGCGATTGTATTGC |
94˚C 30 sec. |
57˚C 45 sec. |
72˚C 30 sec. |
Prevalence of S. aureus among the examined raw cow’s milk samples:
Out of 300 samples examined, 100 samples were positive for S. aureus on MSA and BPA with percentage of (33.3%). S. aureus isolates produced yellow colonies on MSA while produced black colonies surrounded by opaque zone on BPA. They were catalase and coagulase positive and they appeared as gram positive cocci arranged in clusters resemble bunches of grapes on microscopical examination.
Results of determination some virulence factors of S. aureus isolates:
On blood agar media, (68.7%) of S. aureus isolates produced β-hemolysis while (31.3%) of them produced α-hemolysis. On the other hand, (46.3%) of S. aureus isolates showed CRB activity.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and MDR profiles of S. aureus isolates:
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of S. aureus isolates (n=100) revealed the highest sensitivity to vancomycin (100%), followed by amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and gentamycin (97% for each), ciprofloxacin (92%) and erythromycin (82%), while the highest resistance to oxacillin (71%) followed by tetracycline (67%), chloramphenicol (60%) and penicillin (48%) (Table 2).
On the other hand, it was found that (36%) of S. aureus isolates were resistant to 3 antibiotics or more (MDR) and that 27 (75%) of these MDR isolates were MRSA, (Resistant to Oxacillin with other 2 antibiotics at least) So that we select 10 strains of suspected MRSA strains for molecular identification by PCR we found that 8 strains only contain MecA gen. in table (4)
while 9 (25%) of MDR strains of S. aureus were MSSA (but still Resistant to Chloramphenicol, Ciprofloxacin, Penicillin, Tetracycline and Erythromycin) shaded in table (3)
(Table 2). Results of antimicrobial susceptibility of S. aureus isolates.
Antibiotic |
Disc conc. |
Result |
|||||
Sensitive |
Intermediate |
Resistance |
|||||
NO. |
% |
NO. |
% |
NO. |
% |
||
Oxacillin |
1 µg |
29 |
29.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
71 |
71.0% |
Penicillin |
10 µg |
52 |
52% |
0 |
0.0% |
48 |
48.0% |
Amoxicillin / clavulanic acid |
30 µg |
97 |
97.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
3 |
3.0% |
Tetracycline |
30 µg |
31 |
31.0% |
2 |
2.0% |
67 |
67.0% |
Erythromycin |
15 µg |
55 |
55.0% |
27 |
27.0% |
18 |
18.0% |
Ciprofloxacin |
5 µg |
85 |
85.0% |
7 |
7.0% |
8 |
8.0% |
Chloramphenicol |
30 µg |
31 |
31.0% |
9 |
9.0% |
60 |
60.0% |
Gentamycin |
10 µg |
97 |
97.0% |
3 |
3.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
Vancomycin |
30 µg |
100 |
100.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
MDR patterns of S. aureus isolates. (Table 3)
MDR pattern |
No. of resistance antibiotics |
No. of resistance antibiotics classes |
MDR isolates |
|
No. |
%* |
|||
OX-TE-C |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4% |
OX-TE-E |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4% |
P-TE-C |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3% |
OX-CIP-C |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2% |
P-E-CIP |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2% |
P-TE-E |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2% |
OX-P-TE-C |
4 |
3 |
8 |
8% |
OX-P-TE-E |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3% |
OX-AMC-TE-E |
4 |
3 |
2 |
2% |
OX-P-TE-CIP |
4 |
3 |
2 |
2% |
P-TE-E-C |
4 |
4 |
2 |
2% |
OX-P-TE-E-CIP |
5 |
4 |
2 |
2% |
Total |
|
|
36 |
36% |
* Percentage was calculated according to the total number of S. aureus isolates (n=100).
AMC=Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid, C=Chloramphenicol, CIP=Ciprofloxacin, CN=Gentamycin, E=Erythromycin, OX=Oxacillin, P=Penicillin, TE=Tetracycline and VA=Vancomycin
Strain No. |
Virulence factors |
MDR pattern |
Antibiotic resistance gene |
||
Coagulase |
Hemolysin (β or α) |
Biofilm activity |
|
mecA |
|
S1 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
OX- P-TE-C |
+ |
S2 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
OX-P-TE-C |
+ |
S3 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
OX-TE-E |
+ |
S4 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
OX-P-TE-E-CIP |
- |
S5 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
OX-AMC-TE-E |
+ |
S6 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
OX-P-TE-CIP |
- |
S7 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
OX-P-TE-E |
+ |
S8 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
OX-TE |
+ |
S9 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
OX-P-TE-C |
+ |
S10 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
OX-P-TE |
+ |
Table (4) Phenotypic and genotypic characters of the examined MRSA isolates by PCR.
The 16s rRNA gene in the examined MRSA isolates is the target of agar gel electrophoresis for PCR products using specific primers. Lane L: a 100 bp molecular weight marker, Lane Pos: a positive control, Lane Neg: a negative control, and Lanes 1-10: DNA extracted from the tested isolates (S1-S10, respectively), showing positive bands at 1318 bp in all tested isolates. ( fig. 1)
mecA gene is targeted in the examined MRSA isolates by agar gel electrophoresis for PCR products using particular primers. Lanes 1-10 show DNA extracted from the examined isolates (S1-S10, respectively), with positive bands at 310- bp in all but 4 and 6 of the examined isolates. Lane L is a 100 bp molecular weight marker. Lane Pos is a positive control. Lane Neg is a negative control. (fig. 2)
Mastitis in cattle induce significant decrease in RBCs, Hb, PCV% albumin A/G, catalase, super oxide dismutase and significant increase in WBCs, neutrophil, lymphocyte, total protein, globulin, malondialdehyde AST, ALT& ALP,
Table (14) Effect of mastitis in blood picture (n=10/50)
Mastitic cattle |
Healthy cattle |
parameter |
||
6.17±0.87** |
9.13±1.02 |
HB (g m %) |
erythrogram |
|
26.09±0.83** |
31.17±1.06 |
PCV (%) |
||
4.53±0.58** |
7.98±0.89 |
RBcS (106/ml) |
||
47.42±0.99 |
45.16±0.94 |
M.C. V |
Blood indeces Pg/dl |
|
16.83±0.54 |
15.42±0.73 |
M.C.H |
||
27.32±049 |
29.48±0.79 |
M.C. HC |
||
12.21±0.92** |
8.89±0.93 |
Total WBcS. (103/ml) |
Leukogram |
|
49.12±0.87* |
46.5±0.55 |
Neutrophils |
Differenial count% |
|
46.02±0.58* |
44.5±0.45 |
Lymphocyt |
||
2.09±0.31 |
3.20±0.21 |
Eosinophils |
||
1.87±0.54 |
2.07±0.15 |
Basophils |
||
2.04±0.75 |
3.71±0.21 |
Monocytes |
*Significant at P < 0.05 ** Significant at P < 0.01
Table (15) Effect of mastitis in some biochemical parameters (n=10/50)
Mastitic cattle |
Healthy cattle |
parameter |
||
59.12±0.93** |
49.56±0.87 |
ALT |
Liver enzyme (U/L) |
Liver function |
26.23±0.69** |
21 56±0.79 |
AST |
||
56.13±0.99** |
47.48±0.93 |
ALP |
||
4.54±0.44* |
7.34±0.79 |
T. protein |
Protein picture (gm/dl) |
|
2.20±0.35* |
4.35±0.67 |
albumin |
||
2.14±0.62 |
2.99±0.79 |
Globulin |
||
1.03±0.37 |
1.45±0.43 |
A/G Ratio |
||
17.22±0.37* |
12.12±056 |
malondialdehyde (nmol/ml) |
||
26.35±0.43* |
30.56±0.36 |
Catalase |
Antioxidant (U/ml) |
|
89.12±0.45* |
95.24±0.43 |
SOD |
*Significant at P < 0.05 ** Significant at P < 0.01
Discussion
Our results out of 300 mastitic milk samples found staphylococci. 100 (33.3 %0). Low prevelance of staphylococci were reported by Kumar and Prasad (2010) isolate staphylococci in milk sample in percentage 26%. In other study reported by Thaker et al., (2013) who isolate staphylococci in milk sample in percentage of 6.25%. Hight prevelance were reported by Sarkar, et al., (2014) isolate staphylococci aureus in 74.5% of the milk samples. Patel et al. (2007) that showed the prevalence of S. aureus isolated from raw milk samples in India is 10.16 %.
Lingathurai and Vellathurai (2011) reported 61.7% of prevalence of S. aureus from raw milk samples that are higher than our study. However lower prevalence has been previously reported by Fagundes et al., (2010) (10.8%) from Brazil, Ayano et al., (2013) (13.8%) from Ethiopia. Also, these results are nearly similar to results of other study in Turkey conducted by Erhan, et al., (2020) who reported 37.32% of S. aureus from isolates and Results of this study also, differ from results of other study conducted by Abou-Khadra et al., (2020) found that 20% of raw milk samples from Sharkia Governorate were found contaminated with S. aureus. This rate of prevalence has previously been documented by a number of other studies (Ammar et al., 2016) found analyzed samples contaminated with S. aureus in a varying rate of percentages that ranged from 17.34% to 18.80%. Some other studies reported significantly higher levels of contamination ranging from 40% to 61.7 % (Zakary et al., 2011) This is not surprising because milk can be contaminated internally through the production of milk from a diseased animal or externally by infected person or the surrounding
Environment. These prevalence results varied from place to place and regions to regions around the world due to sample size, use of antibiotics in animal husbandry, and hygiene practices among dairy cows. The high incidence of S. aureus is an indication of poor hygienic during production, distribution and handling. Vyas et al., (2015)
In the recent study mecA gene (figure 18) has been identified in all tested isolates that is recognized as MRSA. A lot of studies have been conducted to demonstrate and discuss genetics of S. aureus that includes genes responsible for antibiotic resistance with genes responsible for virulence. Rong et al., (2017). The mecA gene was an important mark gene in detection of methicillin resistance, however many studies now a days discussed the failure of mecA gene in detection of MRSA. Elhassan et al., (2015). Many previous studies have reported MRSA in mastitis cases 48.3% by Guimaraes et al. (2017), 15.5% by Wang et al. (2015), 11.6% by Jamali et al. (2015), and 2.5% by Moon et al. (2007). Transmission of MRSA to humans occur by consuming mastitic milk or direct contact with dairy cows that lead to serious problems to food safety and public health. These results are differed from several other studies which report the presence of 10.3% MRSA isolates. Guimarães et al., (2017) and other study conducted by Gücükoğlu et al., (2012) which report 9.1% MRSA isolates and other study which detect only 1.8% of MRSA in the sample tested. The source of MRSA transmission is due to direct contact with humans or transport animals, where cows infected with MRSA act as a reservoir and then transmit to other animals or humans. Decline et al. (2020). Colonization of MRSA in cows can be a risk factor for people who are in close contact with MRSA infected cows such as milkers, farmers, workers in slaughter-houses and veterinarians. Zakary et al. (2011). The detection of MRSA in milk is of high concern and need strict farm management practices as well as proper sanitation procedures in handling, storage and transportation. Over the last few decades, the prevalence of MRSA is increased exponentially and cause fatal infections and this is reported by clinical and laboratory standards institute (2017).
In this study antibiotic resistance gene (mecA) was detected using PCR as shown in figure (2).
The present work revealed that, mastitic cattle revealed significant reduction in RBCs, Hb PCV% coupled with significant increase in WBCs, neutrophil and lymphocyte beside insignificant effect in MCV, MH and MCHC in infected cattle when compared with control cattle. This change in blood picture may be due to bacterial infection and inflammatory react-ions (Coles, 1986). Another explanation for changes in blood picture of mastitic cattle come from Workineh, et al. (2002) stated that reduction in RBCs and Hb may be due to effects of bacterial toxins but increase in leucocyte, neutrophil and decrease in lymphocyte due to body defense to infection and stress factors. Similar results were reported by Mosallam, et al. (2014) mentioned that cattle suffering from mastitis showed significant increase in leucocyte, neutrophil and decrease in RBCs, Hb PCV% and lymphocyte Mastitic cattle showed significant reduction in RBCs, Hb PCV% beside significant increase in WBCs, neutrophil and lymphocyte associated with insignificant effect in MCV, MH and MCHC in infected cattle (Mohanned, et al. 2015). Same results were recorded by Hussein and Ahmed (2019) recorded that mastitis induce reduction in RBCs, Hb, PCV% beside increase in WBCs, same changes in blood picture were reported by Garba B, et al. (2019) in mastitic goats.
The present investigation declared significant increase serum aspartate amino-transferase, alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase in mastitic cattle. Similar results were observed by Ismail and Hatem, (1998) who attributed increase in liver enzymes may be due to damage of hepatic tissues in acute mastitis. This study is agreed with Asadi et al. (2009) stated that liver enzyme increased in liver enzyme. This finding fitted closely with those of Anirban, et al. (2012) in mastitic buffalo. Same results were reported by Garba B, et al. (2019) and Hussein and Ahmed (2019) stated that mastitis induce increase in liver enzymes.
In the current work obtained data indicated mastitis induces significant increase in total protein and globulin beside decrease in albumin. This reduction in albumin may be due to infiltration of albumin from blood to milk due to increase permeability of blood vessels as a result of inflammation (Honkanen-Buzalski, et al. 1995). In addition, Godden, et al. (2002) stated that bacterial infection and its toxins induce damage of hepatic parenchyma resulting in failure of liver to produce albumin. Same change in total protein, albumin and globulin was recorded in mastitic cattle by Darwish, et al. (2003). These finding were similar to that reported by Mosallam, et al. (2014) found that mastitis induced decrease in albumin and increase in globulin. Our results were agreed with results of Santos, et al. (2018) stated that mastitis induce significant decrease in serum albumin in ewes. These findings are in accordance with Garba B, et al. (2019) who detected a significant decrease in serum decrease in albumin and increase in globulin in mastitic goats and they attributed that to endotoxin release from pathogenic bacteria which damaged liver cells.
The present investigation declared a significant increase serum malondialdehyde beside significant decrease in catalase and super oxide dismutase in the mastitic cattle when compared with the healthy control cattle. These findings are in accordance with Hayrettin et al., (2005) reported that mastitis induce significant increase in malondialdehyde in mastitic ewes. This finding fitted closely with those of Feng et al., (2011) found that bacterial infections induce increase in malondialdehyde beside decrease in Catalase and super oxide dismutase in mastitic cattle. This finding fitted closely with those of Ranjan, et al. (2005) stated that mastitis increased malondialdehyde and decrease in catalase and .in dairy cows. this finding was similar to that reported by Jhambh, et al. (2013) found that mastitis in dairy cows showed increase in malondialdehyde and decrease in antioxidant enzymes (catalase and super oxide dismutase.)
Conclusion
MRSA can be transmitted from infected cows to humans who come into contact with them, such as farmers and veterinarians. This can pose a significant risk to human health, as MRSA infections can be difficult to treat and can lead to severe complications, such as sepsis and pneumonia.
Preventing the spread of MRSA in dairy herds is therefore essential to protect both animal and human health. Good management practices, such as regular cleaning and disinfection of milking equipment and proper hygiene during milking, can help reduce the risk of infection.
In addition, selective use of antibiotics and implementation of infection control measures can also help prevent the spread of MRSA in dairy herds. Vaccination against S. aureus is another potential strategy for reducing the incidence of mastitis caused by this bacterium.
Overall, MRSA infections in cows with mastitis represent a significant challenge for the dairy industry and public health. Further research is needed to better understand the epidemiology and transmission of MRSA in dairy herds and to develop effective strategies for preventing and treating these infections.
Abou-Khadra S, El-Shorbagy I and El-Azzouny M (2020): Rapid detection of enterotoxigenic Staph aureus isolated from raw milk in Sharkia governorate, Egypt. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci 8(1)11-17
Anirban, et al. (2012) Evaluation of Milk Trace Elements, Lactate Dehydrogenase, Alkaline Phosphatase and Aspartate Amino-transferase Activity of Subclinical Mastitis as an Indicator of Subclinical Mastitis in Riverine Buffalo. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 25(3): 353–360
Asadi, Z., Nazifi, S and Haghkhan, M (2009) Tace Elements and related enzyme in clinical and Sub Clinical bovine mastitis. J. of Vet. Research, 13: 104-113.
Ayano A.A, Hiriko F, Simyalew A.M, Yohannes A. (2013): Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in lactating cows in selected commercial dairy farms of Holeta district. J. Vet. Med. Anim. Health. 5(3):67–72.
Azimian, A., Havaei, S. A., Fazeli, H., Naderi, M., Ghazvini, K., Samiee, S. M., Soleimani, M. and Peerayehh, S. N. 2012. Genetic characterization of a Vancomycin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolate from the respiratory tract of a patient in a University Hospital in Northeastern Iran. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 50 (11): 3581-3585.
Basanisi, M. G., La Bella, G., Nobili, G., Franconieri, I., and La Salandra, G. (2017). Genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from milk and dairy products in South Italy. Food Microbiol. 62, 141–146. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.10.020
Boerlin, P., Kuhnert, P., Hüssy, D. and Schaellibaum, M. 2003. Methods for identification of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in cases of bovine mastitis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 41(2): 767-771.
Buxton, R. 2005. Blood agar plates and hemolysis protocols. American Society for Microbiology, p: 1-9.
CLSI (2017). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. M100- S27. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne PA, USA.
Coles, E. (1986): Veterinary Clinical Pathology. 4th Ed. W. B. Saunders Company, London.company, London.
Dai, J., Wu, S., Huang, J., Wu, Q., Zhang, F.,Zhang, J., Wang, J., Ding, Y., Zhang, S.,Yang, X., Lei, T., Xue, L. and Wu, H. 2019. Prevalence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from pasteurized milk in China. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10: 641.
Darwish, Fatma, M.; ALI, R. and Youssef, E. (2003): Immunohistochemical, pathological and biochemical studies on mastitis in sheep and goats associated with bacterial infection. J. Egypt Vet.Med. Asso. (1)121-149.
Decline V, Effendi M and Harijani N. (2020) Profile of antibiotic-resistant and presence of methicillin-resistant Staph aureus from nasal swab of dogs from several animal clinics in Surabaya, Indonesia, Int. J. One Health, 6(1): 90-94.
Doulgeraki, A., Ianieri, A. and Nychas, G. (2017): Methicillin-resistant food-related Staph aureus: A review of current knowledge and biofilm formation for future studies. Res in Microbiology, 168(1), 1-15.
Dufour, S., Dohoo, I. R., Barkema, H. W., Descôteaux, L., Devries, T. J., Reyher,
Elhassan, M; Elmeki, M and Ahmed, L (2015) Absence of mecA gene in methicillin resistant Staph aureus isolated from different clinical specimens in Shendi City, Sudan. Biom Res. Int. 2015. Article ID 895860, 5 pages,
Erhan, K.; Ozen, Y. and Halil Y. (2020) Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staph aureus in Bulk Tank Milk. Food Sci. Technol, Campinas, 40(1): 150-156.
Fagundes H, Barchesi L, Filho AN, Ferreira L.M, Oliveira C.A.F. (2010): Occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus in raw milk produced in dairy farms in São Paulo state, Brazil. Braz. J. Microbiol.41(2):376–380.
Feng, L; Xiao, S and Jin, L (2011) Malondialdehyde level and enzymatic activities in subclinical mastitis milk. African J of Biot,10(28)34-38.
Freeman, D. J., Falkiner, F. R. and Keane, C.T. 1989. New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci. Journal of Clinical Pathology, (42): 872-874.
Garba B, Habibullah SA, Saidu B, Suleiman N. (2019) Effect of mastitis on some hematological and biochemical parameters of Red Sokoto goats. Veterinary World, 12(4): 572-577.
Field Validation of a Milk Line Sampling Device for Monitoring Milk Quality and Udder Health Journal of Dairy Science Volume 85, Issue 6,Pages 1468-1475
Gücükoğlu, A., T.O.Kevenk,T.OnurUyanik,Ö.Cadirci,G. Terzi,and M. Alisarli. (2012): Detection of enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus in raw milk and dairy products by multiplex PCR.J. Food Sci. 77:M620–M623
Guimarães F.F., M.P. Manzi, S.F. Joaquim, V.B. Richini-Pereira, H. Langoni. (2017): Outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-associated mastitis in a closed dairy herd. J. of Dairy Sci 100(1), 726-730.
Hayrettin, E.; Sema, Y. and Oktay, K. (2005). Investigation of anti-oxidant enzymes and some biochemical parameters in ewes with mastitis. Turk J Vet Sci. 29:33-38.
Honkanen-Buzalski, T., & Seuna, E. (1995).
The bovine udder and mastitis. Gummerus, Jyväskylä, Finland, 121-142.
Hussein, S. G., & Ahmed, A. J. (2019). IMPACT OF MASTITIS ON LIVER ENZYMES AND MILK COMPOSITION IN IRAQ DAIRY CATTLES. Plant Archives, 19(1), 625-629.
Ismail, T. and Hatem, M. (1998): Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in dairy cattle in the eastern region of Saudi Arabia. 8th Sci. Con. Fac.Vet. Med.Assiut Univ. 19.
Jakobsen, R. A., Heggebø, R., Sunde, E. B., and Skjervheim, M. (2011). Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes in Norwegian raw milk cheese production. Food Microbiol. 28, 492–496. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2010.10.017
Jamali, H., Paydar, M. and Dadrasnia, A. (2015): Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw milk and dairy products. Food Control, 54, 383- 388.
Jhambh, R.; Dimri, U.; Gupta, V. and Rathore, R. (2013) Blood antioxidant profile and lipid peroxides in dairy cows with clinical mastitis, Vet. World 6(5):271-273,
Kateete, D. P., Kabugo, U., Baluku, H., Nyakarahuka, L., Kyobe, S., Okee, M., et al. (2013). Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria from milkmen and cows with clinical mastitis in and around Kampala, Uganda. PLoS ONE 8:e63413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063413
Kumar R, Prasad A. (2010): Detection of E. coli and Staphylococcus in milk and milk products in and around Pantnagar. Pak. J. Nutr. 1(3):151–152.
Lingathurai S, Vellathurai P. (2011): Bacteriological quality and safety of raw cow milk in Madurai, South India. Webmed. Cent. Microbiol. 1:1–10.
Liu, H., Li, S., Meng, L., Dong, L., Zhao, S., Lan, X., et al. (2017). Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from dairy herds in northern China. J. Dairy Sci. 100, 8796–8803. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13370
Lozano, C., Zarazaga, M., and Torres, K. (2016): Staph aureus in animals and food: Methicillin-resistance, prevalence and population structure: A review in African continent. Microorganisms, 4 (12), 1-19.
Mohanned, A.; Shiv, P.; Ashok K. and Ajay, K. (2015) A comparative study on the blood and milk cell counts of healthy, subclinical, and clinical mastitis Karan Fries cows. Vet World. 8(5): 685–689.
Moon J.-S., A.-R. Lee, H.-M. Kang, E.-S. Lee, M.-N. Kim, Y.H. Paik, Y.H. Park, Y.-S. Joo, H.C. Koo (2007): Phenotypic and Genetic Antibiogram of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci Isolated from Bovine Mastitis in Korea. J. Dairy Sci. 90:1176–1185
Mosallam, T; Hanaa, A. and Ahmed, A (2014) clinical, bacteriological and biochemical studies on mastitis in cattle. Zag. Vet Med.J.42(3)24-32
Nam LV, Quyet D, Hung PN, Tien TV, Thanh KC, Dung QA, Linh DD, Tan HT, Bac ND, Dinh TC, Pho DC. (2019): Antibiotic Resistance Profile and Methicillin-Resistant Encoding Genes of Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated from Bloodstream Infection Patients in Northern Vietnam
Basic and Clinical Medical Researches in Vietnam Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 20;7(24):4406-4410.
Oniciuc, E.; Nicolau, A. and Rodríguez, D. (2017): Presence of methicillin-resistant Staph aureus in the food chain. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 61, 49-59.
Patel.N.P., (2007): Determination of virulence factors in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical cases of mastitis in sheep, goat, cattle, and buffaloes M.Sc. thesis, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University. Sardarkrushinagar.
Paterson G. K., Larsen J., Harrison E. M., Larsen A. R., Morgan F. J., Peacock S. J., et al. (2012): First detection of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 in bulk tank milk in the United Kingdom, January to July 2012. Euro. Surveil. 17:20337.
Paterson G. K., Morgan F. J., Harrison E. M., Peacock S. J., Parkhill J., Zadoks R. N., et al. (2014): Prevalence and properties of mecC methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in bovine bulk tank milk in Great Britain. J Antimicrobe Chemotherapy 69 598–602.
Ranjan, R., Swarup, D., and Patra, R. (2005) Enhanced erythrocytic lipid peroxides and reduced plasma ascorbic acid, and alteration in blood trace elements level in dairy cows’ mastitis. Vet. Res. Comm. 29: 27–34.
Riffon, R., Sayasith, K., Khalil, H., Dubreuil, P., Drolet, M. and Lagacé, J. 2001. Development of a rapid and sensitive test for identification of major pathogens in bovine mastitis by PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 39 (7): 2584-2589.
Rola, J. G., Czubkowska, A., Korpysa-Dzirba, W., and Osek, J. (2016). Occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus on farms with small scale production of raw milk cheeses in Poland. Toxins (Basel). 8: E62. doi: 10.3390/toxins80 30062
Rong, D., Wu, Q. and Yu, S. (2017): Prevalence, virulence genes, antimicrobial susceptibility, and genetic diversity of Staph from retail aquatic products in China. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8:714.
Santos, K.R., Souza, F.N., Blagitz, M.G., Batista, C.F., Bertagnon, H.G., Gomes, R.C., Diniz, S.A., Haddad, J.P.A . and Libera, A.M.M. (2018): Mastitis in the transition period: Identification of potential blood markers.
Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 70 (04)
Sarkar, P., Mohanta, D., & Debnath, C. (2014). Staphylococcus aureus in dairy animals and farm workers in a closed herd in Karnal, North India: Assessment of prevalence rate and COA variations. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol, 3(4), 10962-10972.
Schroeder, J. W. (2012). Bovine Mastitis and Milking Management. North Dakota State University. Available online at: http://www.clemson.edu/extension/ scaged/scffa/career-development-events/files/dairy-evaluation/mastitis- control-programs.pdf (Accessed 2018 March).
Thaker H.C, Brahmbhatt M.N, Nayak J.B. (2013): Isolation and identification of Staphylococcus aureus from milk and milk products and their drug resistance patterns in Anand, Gujarat. Vet. World. 6(1):10–13.
Vet World. 12(4): 572–577
Tenhagen, B., Wiehle, L. and Fetsch, A. (2018): Short communication: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in conventional and organic dairy herds in Germany. J of Dairy Sci, 101(4)380-386
Vyas, A., Sharma, M., Kumar, S., Kumar, M., & Mehra, S. K. (2015). A comparative study of oxacillin screen agar, oxacillin disc diffusion and cefoxitin disc diffusion, oxacillin E-test method for routine screening of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. International journal of current research and review, 7(10), 55.
Wang, D., Wang, Z., Yan, Z., Wu, J., Ali, T., Li, J., ... & Han, B. (2015). Bovine mastitis Staphylococcus aureus: antibiotic susceptibility profile, resistance genes and molecular typing of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive strains in China. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 31, 9-16.
Workineh, S.; Bayleyegan, M.; Mckonnen, H. and Potgieter, I. (2002): Prevalence and an etiology of mastitis in cows from major Ethiopian dairies. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 34 (1): 19-25.
Zakary, E. M., Nassif, M. Z., & Mohammed, G. M. (2011). Detection of Staphylococcus aureus in bovine milk and its product by real time PCR assay. Global Journal of Biotechnology & Biochemistry, 6(4), 171-177.
Zecconi, A., and Scali, F. (2013). Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors in evasion from innate immune defenses in human and animal diseases. Immunol. Lett. 150, 12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2013.01.004