Detection of Enterotoxin A gene in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Broiler farms in Bohera Governorate

Document Type : Original researches

Abstract

Staphylococcus causes disease conditions in poultry and widely distributed. Broilers may suffer from Staphylococcus aureus infection and its enterotoxins resulting in a major public health hazard and economic losses. This study aimed to detect the presence of Staphylococcus aureus producing Enterotoxin A in some broiler farms. Samples were collected from 200 broiler chickens, 60 apparently healthy (nasal swabs, tracheal swabs & cloacal swabs), and 140 diseased broilers (lung, liver, heart blood, spleen & thigh bone marrow).   Samples were collected aseptically from 10 randomly selected broiler farms in Bohera Governorate, Egypt, and were subjected for bacteriological examination for isolation and identification of S. aureus. The results of isolation of Staphylococcus from broiler chicken samples revealed that out of 200 bacteriologically examined broilers obtained from a total of 98 (49%) Staphylococcus isolates were isolated, 23  (38.3%) from apparently healthy and 75 (53.6%) from diseased birds. Also,  out of the  98 Staphylococcus isolates 20 (20.4%) were identified as coagulase positive S. aureus of which 4 isolates (17.4%) isolated from apparently healthy birds and 16 isolates (21.3%) from diseased ones. In apparently healthy birds, S. aureus was isolated from nasal swab, tracheal swab and cloacal swab samples with percentages of 10%, 12.5% and 40%, respectively. In diseased birds, S. aureus was isolated from lung, liver, heart blood, spleen and thigh bone marrow samples with  percentages of 15%, 24%, 20%, 20% and 26.7%, respectively. Antimicrobial resistance against 10 antimicrobial agents was performed and revealed that ciprofloxacin was the most effective antibiotic with susceptibility percentage of 95% followed by levofloxacin with sensitivity percent 75% and enrofloxacin, gentamycin (70% for each). All the S. aureus isolates were completely resistance against trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (100% resistance), followed by streptomycin, tetracycline and erythromycin with resistant percentages 80% for each. Variable degrees of sensitivity were reported for colistin sulfate and penicillin with  percentages of  55 % and 45%, respectively. Molecular identification of S. aureus Enterotoxin A (SEA) gene by PCR using specific primers revealed that 3 isolates out of 10 (30%) were positive for Enterotoxin A (SEA) gene. Our study concluded that broilers may act as a source of S. aureus which causes diseased problems leading to large economic losses, and broilers may be a source of (SEA) gene which can transmit to human causing illness.

Keywords


Detection of Enterotoxin A gene in Staphylococcus aureus  isolated from Broiler farms in Bohera Governorate    

Saad EAK, Garamoun*; Nahed AES, Naem* and Ahlam E, Yonis**

 

*Bacteriology Department, Reference Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control on Poultry Production, Animal Health Research Institute.

 

**Biotechnology Department, Reference Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control on Poultry Production, Animal Health Research Institute.

 

Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Giza, Egypt

Corresponding author: Saad Garamoun Email: saad.kotb@yahoo.com

 

Keywords: Enterotoxin A  and Staphylococcus aureus.

 

Abstract:

Staphylococcus causes disease conditions in poultry and widely distributed. Broilers may suffer from Staphylococcus aureus infection and its enterotoxins resulting in a major public health hazard and economic losses. This study aimed to detect the presence of Staphylococcus aureus producing Enterotoxin A in some broiler farms. Samples were collected from 200 broiler chickens, 60 apparently healthy (nasal swabs, tracheal swabs & cloacal swabs), and 140 diseased broilers (lung, liver, heart blood, spleen & thigh bone marrow).   Samples were collected aseptically from 10 randomly selected broiler farms in Bohera Governorate, Egypt, and were subjected for bacteriological examination for isolation and identification of S. aureus. The results of isolation of Staphylococcus from broiler chicken samples revealed that out of 200 bacteriologically examined broilers obtained from a total of 98 (49%) Staphylococcus isolates were isolated, 23  (38.3%) from apparently healthy and 75 (53.6%) from diseased birds. Also,  out of the  98 Staphylococcus isolates 20 (20.4%) were identified as coagulase positive S. aureus of which 4 isolates (17.4%) isolated from apparently healthy birds and 16 isolates (21.3%) from diseased ones. In apparently healthy birds, S. aureus was isolated from nasal swab, tracheal swab and cloacal swab samples with percentages of 10%, 12.5% and 40%, respectively. In diseased birds, S. aureus was isolated from lung, liver, heart blood, spleen and thigh bone marrow samples with  percentages of 15%, 24%, 20%, 20% and 26.7%, respectively. Antimicrobial resistance against 10 antimicrobial agents was performed and revealed that ciprofloxacin was the most effective antibiotic with susceptibility percentage of 95% followed by levofloxacin with sensitivity percent 75% and enrofloxacin, gentamycin (70% for each). All the S. aureus isolates were completely resistance against trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (100% resistance), followed by streptomycin, tetracycline and erythromycin with resistant percentages 80% for each. Variable degrees of sensitivity were reported for colistin sulfate and penicillin with  percentages of  55 % and 45%, respectively. Molecular identification of S. aureus Enterotoxin A (SEA) gene by PCR using specific primers revealed that 3 isolates out of 10 (30%) were positive for Enterotoxin A (SEA) gene. Our study concluded that broilers may act as a source of S. aureus which causes diseased problems leading to large economic losses, and broilers may be a source of (SEA) gene which can transmit to human causing illness.

                                            

Introduction:

       Most Staphylococcus species are pathogenic and capable of producing toxins that result in health problems for both humans and animals. Staphylococcus aureus is naturally found as normal flora on animals and humans’ skin (Fetsch and  Johler. 2018) and on mucosal surfaces such as the upper respiratory tract, alimentary tract, and genitourinary tract. It easily spread between different animal species, and between humans and animal species (Weese. 2010). S. aureus is an important foodborne pathogen associated to food intoxication and other multiple infections (Rashid et al. 2021). Staphylococcus infection cause both systemic infection or localized lesions. It causes arthritis, synovitis, chondronecrosis with osteomyelitis when invade the metaphyseal area of joints. Also, it causes omphalitis, gangrenous dermatitis, localized abscesses, and endocarditis (Abou-Zahr et al. 2018).

  1. aureus is a gram-positive, catalase-positive, coccoid bacteria that appears in grape-like clusters on stained smears (Todar. 2008). S. aureus produces some virulent toxins and enzymes and has some virulent surface proteins, which together contribute to its pathogenicity since it is one of the most significant and widespread foodborne causes and is implicated usually of food poisoning .

            Antibiotics are dangerously overused in the veterinary industry, which results in the emergence of human-transmittable, multidrug-resistant S. aureus strains (Wafaa. 2021). Resistance to frequently used antibiotics was reported in bacteria present in broiler since the introduction of these antimicrobial agents (Mamza et al. 2010), including penicillin, erythromycin, and tetracyclines, are widely used for treating Staphylococcal infections in broiler (White et al. 2003). The proportion of resistant bacteria are increasing in the poultry due to excessive use of antibiotics in the broiler farms (Lukášová and Šustáčková. 2003). Enterotoxin-producing S. aureus is the most common cause of food-borne human illness throughout the world (Do Carmo et al. 2004).

  1. aureus enterotoxin A (SEA)  in broiler chickens is a potential health risk  for consumers (Olimpia et al. 2006).  SEA  is capable of causing gastroenteritis in humans, thereby making them the causative agents of Staphylococcus food poisoning (SFP) (Wu and Su. 2014). In addition,  SEA  is resistant to proteolytic enzymes and normal heat processing; even if S. aureus have been sterilized, the biological activity of  SEA  remains unchanged. According to regulation (EC No. 1441/2007), S. aureus strains that produces enterotoxin A (SEA), are the most common type of S. aureus enterotoxins in food products (Zeaki et al. 2014).

 

Materials and methods:

Collection of samples:

          Samples were collected aseptically from a total of 200 broiler chickens (60 apparently healthy and 140 diseased) from 10 randomly selected broiler farms in Bohera Governorate, Egypt. The  diseased broiler chickens  appeared weak with  reduction of body weight, dehydration and swollen joints. The collected samples included nasal swabs, tracheal swabs & cloacal swabs (from apparently healthy broilers), lung, liver, heart blood, spleen & thigh bone marrow (from diseased broilers) as shown in table (1), then kept in ice box then immediately transported to the laboratory.

 

 

Table (1): samples collected for staphylococcus isolation from broiler chickens  :

 

Broiler cases

Samples

No.

%

Apparently healthy

60

30

Diseased

140

70

Total

200

100

No.= number of broiler cases. %= percent of broiler cases.

  1. aureus Isolation and Identification:

        For isolation of  Staphylococci the collected samples were inoculated on  nutrient broth  and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours and subcultured on blood agar, mannitol salt agar and Baird Parker agar media according to Quinn et al. (2002). Identification was carried out according to their colony characteristics,  microscopic  appearance with Gram stained, and biochemical characterization including  positive catalase reaction, hemolysin production, and coagulase test with rabbit plasma (tube method) for initial differentiation of S. aureus and coagulase negative Staphylococcus isolates according to Quinn et al. (2002)

Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility:

       The antimicrobial susceptibility of S. aureus isolates were determined by standard disc diffusion method according to the recommendations of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI. 2022). For this purpose Ten Antimicrobial agents were used: penicillin  (5 ug), ciprofloxacin (5 ug), colistin sulfate (25 ug), gentamicin (30 ug), streptomycin (10 ug), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (23.73–1.25 ug), tetracycline (30 ug), levofloxacin (5 ug), enrofloxacine (5 ug) and erythromycin (15 ug). (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK). The results were interpreted according to NCCLS. (2002).

Molecular characterization of S. aureus  enterotoxin A isolates:

DNA extraction:

        DNA extraction from samples was performed using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany, GmbH) with modifications from the manufacturer’s recommendations according to Eid and Erfan. (2013). Briefly, 200 µl of the sample suspension was incubated with 10 µl of proteinase K and 200 µl of lysis buffer at 56OC for 10 min. After incubation, 200 µl of 100% ethanol was added to the lysate. The sample was then washed and centrifuged following the manufacturer’s recommendations according to Eid and Erfan. (2013). Nucleic acid was eluted with 100 µl of elution buffer provided in the kit.

 

Oligonucleotide Primers:

      Primers used were supplied from Metabion (Germany) are listed in table (2).

 

PCR amplification:

       Primers were utilized in a 25- µl reaction containing 12.5 µl of EmeraldAmp Max PCR Master Mix (Takara, Japan), 1 µl of each primer of 20 pmol concentration, 5.5 µl of water, and 5 µl of DNA template. The reaction was performed in an Applied biosystem 2720 thermal cycler.

 

Analysis of the PCR Products:

      The products of PCR were separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel (Applichem, Germany, GmbH) in 1x TBE buffer at room temperature using gradients of 5V/cm. For gel analysis, 20 µl of the products was loaded in each gel slot. A generuler 100 bp ladder (Fermentas, Germany) was used to determine the fragment sizes. The gel was photographed by a gel documentation system (Alpha Innotech, Biometra) and the data was analyzed through computer software.

 

Table (2): Primers sequences, amplicon sizes and cycling conditions of S. aureus enterotoxin A (SEA) gene (Mehrotra et al. 2000):

 

 

Primers sequences

Amplified segment (bp)

 

Primer

Den.

Amplification (35 cycles)

 

Final extension

Sec. den.

Ann.

Ext.

GGTTATCAATGTGCGGGTGG

102

94˚C

5 min

94˚C

30 sec.

57˚C

30 sec.

72˚C

30 sec.

72˚C

7 min.

CGGCACTTTTTTCTCTTCGG

Den., denaturation, Sec. den., secondary denaturation, Ann., annealing & Ext., extension.

 

Results:

            The results of  isolation of Staphylococcus from broiler chicken samples revealed that out of 200 bacteriologically examined broilers obtained from a total of 98 (49%) Staphylococcus isolates were isolated, 23 (38.3%) from apparently healthy and 75 (53.6%) from diseased birds. Also, out of the 98 Staphylococcus isolates 20 (20.4%) were identified as coagulase positive S. aureus  of which  4 isolates (17.4%) isolated from apparently healthy birds and 16 isolates (21.3%) from diseased ones. On the other hand,  78 isolates  (79.6%) of coagulase negative Staphylococci were isolated from both apparently healthy (19) and diseased birds (59) with  percentages of  (82.6%) and (78.7%)  as shown in table (3).

 

Table (3): Prevalence of coagulase positive S. aureus in apparently healthy and diseased broiler cases:

 

Broiler cases

Broiler cases number

Total number of Staphylococci

Coagulase positive

S. aureus

Coagulase negative

Staphylococci

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Apparently healthy

60

23

38.3

4

17.4

19

82.6

Diseased

140

75

53.6

16

21.3

59

78.7

Total

200

98

49

20

20.4

78

79.6

                         No.= number of  isolates. %= percentage  .

 

Out of 23/60 (38.3%) cases Staphylococci found in apparently healthy birds, coagulase positive S. aureus  isolated from 4/ 23 (17.4%) cases and coagulase negative Staphylococci isolated from 19/23 (82.6%) cases. The S. aureus was isolated from nasal swab, tracheal swab and cloacal swab samples with a percent of 1/10 (10%), 1/8 (12.5%) and 2/5 (40%), respectively, as shown in table (4).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table (4): Prevalence of coagulase positive S. aureus in different samples of 60 apparently healthy broiler chickens.

 

Source of

collected sample

Total number of

Staphylococci

Coagulase positive

S. aureus

Coagulase negative

Staphylococci

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Nasal swabs

10

16.7

1

10

9

90

Tracheal swabs

8

13.3

1

12.5

7

87.5

Cloacal swabs

5

8.3

2

40

3

60

Total

23

38.3

4

17.4

19

82.6

                         No.= number of  isolates. %= percentage 

Out of 75/140 (53.6%) cases Staphylococci found in diseased birds, coagulase positive S. aureus  isolated from 16/75 (21.3%) cases and coagulase negative Staphylococci isolated from 59/75 (78.7%) cases. The S. aureus was isolated from lung, liver, heart blood, spleen and thigh bone marrow samples with a percent of 3/20 (15%), 6/25 (24%), 2/10 (20%), 1/5 (20%) and 4/15 (26.7%), respectively, as shown in table (5).

 

Table (5): Prevalence of coagulase positive S. aureus in different organs of 140 diseased broiler chickens:

 

Source of

collected sample

Total number of

Staphylococci

Coagulase positive

S. aureus

Coagulase negative

Staphylococci

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Lung

20

14.3

3

15

17

85

Liver

25

17.9

6

24

19

76

Heart blood

10

7.1

2

20

8

80

Spleen

5

3.6

1

20

4

80

Thigh bone marrow

15

10.7

4

26.7

11

73.3

Total

75

53.6

16

21.3

59

78.7

                         No.= number of  isolates. %= percentage 

All S. aureus isolates (20) were tested for susceptibility to 10 antimicrobial agents. The results of antimicrobial sensitivity tests indicated that ciprofloxacin was the most effective antibiotic in our study with susceptibility percentage of 95% followed by levofloxacin with sensitivity percent 75% and enrofloxacin, gentamycin (70% for each). Conversely, all the S. aureus isolates were  completely resistance against trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (100% resistance), followed by streptomycin, tetracycline and erythromycin with resistant percentages 80% for each. Variable degrees of sensitivity were reported for   colistin sulfate and penicillin with  percentages of  55 % and 45%, respectively,  as illustrated  in  (Table 6).

 

Table (6). Antimicrobial susceptibility test of S. aureus isolates (No. = 20):

 

Antimicrobial agents

Conc. of disc

Symbol

Sensitive

 

Resistant

No.

%

No.

%

Penicillin (P)

5 ug

 

9

45

11

55

Ciprofloxacin (CIP)

5 ug

 

19

95

1

5

Colistin sulfate (CT)

30 ug

 

11

55

9

45

Gentamicin (GEN)

10 ug

 

14

70

6

30

Streptomycin (S)

10 ug

 

4

20

16

80

Sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT)

23.73–1.25 ug

 

-

-

20

100

Tetracycline   (TET)

30 ug

 

4

20

16

80

levofloxacin (LEV)

5 ug

 

15

75

5

25

Enrofloxacin (ENR )

5 ug

 

14

70

6

30

Erythromycin  €

15 ug

 

4

20

16

80

    %, calculated according to the No. of tested isolates (20)

 

Detection of enterotoxin A gene for 10 isolates of S. aureus (SEA), revealed presence of 3 positive isolates,   as showed in figure (1).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure (1): Agarose gel electrophoresis patterns showing PCR amplification products for the S. aureus enterotoxin A (SEA) gene. Lanes L, DNA molecular size marker (100-1000bp ladder; Bethesda Research Laboratories Inc., Gaithersburg, Md.), lanes 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 & 10 (Negative). lanes 3, 7 & 9  (Positive).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion:

       Staphylococcus species are significant bacteria in the etiology of avian diseases (Saleh et al. 2003). Broiler chickens are regarded as an import­ant reservoir for pathogenic S. aureus strains. In the current study, 98 Staphylococcal isolates were isolated from  200 broilers with a percentage of (49%) which higher than that reported by Masdooq et al. 2008  (15.2%), who isolated Staphylococci from pathogenic bacteria associated with respiratory diseases in poultry and nearly similar to the percentage detected by  (Abd El Tawwab et al. 2014) who recorded 51.6% Staphylococcal species in broiler chickens.

        In the current study, coagulase positive S. aureus were isolated in rate of 20.4% of both apparently healthy and diseased broiler chickens, these results were nearly similar to results of (Abd El Tawwab et al. 2014 and Elmossalamy et al. 2020) which confirmed isolated coagulase positive S. aureus from 22.6% and 20% of the broiler chickens. Higher rates were recorded by (Abd El-Tawab et al. 2017;  Ali et al. 2017 and Amen et al. 2019) who recovered S. aureus in 66%,  90% and 74.07% of the tested broiler chickens, respectively.  

         Coagulase positive S. aureus was recovered from 4 samples (17.4%) of apparently healthy broiler chickens and 16 samples (21.3%) from diseased broiler chickens, these results were nearly in accordance with (Abd El Tawwab et al. 2014) who found coagulase positive S. aureus with a percent of 20.7% in apparently healthy broilers and 18.9% in diseased broiler chickens.

  1. aureus in apparently healthy broiler chickens was mostly recovered from cloacal swab samples with an incidence of 40% followed by tracheal swab and nasal swab samples with prevalence of 12.5% and 10%, respectively, which agreed with (Abd El Tawwab et al. 2014).
  2. aureus in diseased broiler chickens was highly recovered from thigh bone marrow samples with an incidence of 26.7% followed by liver, heart blood, spleen and lung samples with prevalence of 24%, 20%, 20% and 15%, respectively, which agreed with (Abd El Tawwab et al. 2014).

          Widespread occurrence and persistence of antimicrobial-resistant S. aureus in livestock animals is a major public health concern, in humans and animals (Becker et al. 2017). The marked and continuous use of the  antimicrobial agents during short period all over the raising period of broiler chickens not only to control and prevent disease but also for growth promotion and improved feed conversion efficiency (Bertolatti et al. 2003). Antibiotic Sensitivity tests using 10 antibiotic agents revealed that ciprofloxacin was the most sensitive antibiotic followed by levofloxacin, enrofloxacin and gentamicin by percentage of 95%, 75%, 70% and 70%, respectively while the highest resistance was to the sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim, tetracycline, erythromycin and streptomycin by percentage of 100%, 80%, 80% and 80%, respectively . These results were disagreed to that of (Abd El Tawwab et al. 2014) who found that the highest sensitivity rates were to vancomycin, amoxicillin + clavulinic acid and cephalothin by 84.5%, 83.8% and 78.4, respectively and the highest resistance were to ampicillin, oxacillin and penicillin by 75.7%, 73% and 70.2%, respectively. Our study revealed that  100% of S. aureus isolates were resistant to   sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim which agreed with (Bakheet et al. 2018) who tested S. aureus isolates against selected antibiotics commonly used in poultry farms and found that 100% of isolates were resistant to sulphamethazole -trimethoprim. They also recorded 100% of isolates were resistant to streptomycin which nearly similar to our results where we recorded 80%  of S. aureus isolates resistant to streptomycin. Bakheet et al. (2018) also revealed that 100% of S. aureus isolates were sensitive to enrofloxacin which nearly similar to this study where 70% of S. aureus isolates were sensitive to enrofloxacin. Amen et al. (2019) revealed that S. aureus isolates were highly sensitive to ciprofloxacine, enrofloxacine and resistant to erythromycin and streptomycine which nearly similar to our results. The variances in resistance patterns are commonly due to factors which include differences in geographical locations, particular bacteria species involved, the animal production systems, the extent to which antibiotics are used, sampling techniques and period of sampling as reported by (Adzitey et al. 2015).

        The enterotoxin genes are accessory genetic elements in S. aureus, meaning that not all strains of this organism are enterotoxin producing, they are encoded by mobile genetic elements including phages, plasmid and pathogenicity islands (Martin et al. 2004). SEA is the most common toxin involved in Staphylococcal food poisoning outbreak, although Staphylococcal endotoxins are generally considered to be heat stable (Halpin-Dohnalek and  Marth. 1989). From 10 isolates of S. aureus were detected by PCR for the SEA gene, there were 3 isolates positive for SEA gene originated from broiler chickens, that means that the broiler chickens may act  as a source of SEA which agreed with (Hassan-Aisha. 2007) and (Gad. 2004) who stated that S. aureus isolates from broiler chickens produced SEA. Also (Azevedo et al. 2009) recorded that 30% of the examined S. aureus strains isolated from broiler were enterotoxigenic and produced SEA. Elmossalamy et al. (2020) revealed S. aureus strains isolated from broiler chickens have the ability to produce SEA which represent a public health hazard, and that agreed with our study.

 

Conclusion:

 Staphylococcus is one of the organisms that are widely distributed in broiler chicken farms. In this study, S. aureus was isolated with a percent of 20.4% from boiler chickens. Antimicrobial susceptibility test of the S. aureus isolates showed  a multi-drug resistance, so it is important to continually monitor antibiotic susceptibilities. Also, further studies should be made to determine antimicrobial susceptibility test which should be carried regularly to determine the development of resistance against the commonly applied antibiotics used in field at broiler farm helping the clinician's choice of antibiotic to control infection.

     Our study revealed the presence of SEA gene in broiler chickens, so broiler chickens should be considered as a reservoir of SEA and should be careful during dealing with broiler chickens which suspected to infection with SEA which may be transmitted to humans.  

 

Abd El Tawab A, Fatma IH, Sahar RM, Sohila HA. (2017). Characterization of Methicillin Resistance Staphylococcus aureus isolated from chicken and human. Benha Univ. Med. J. 32 (1): 132- 137.
 Abd El Tawwab AA, Fahmy HA, El Hofy FI, Elshawadfy AA. (2014). Detection of species-specific gene thermonuclease (nuc) in Staphylococcus aureus from chickens by real- time PCR assay. BVMJ‐27(2):415‐422. http://www.bvmj.bu.edu.eg.
 Abou-Zahr T, Carrasco DC, Dvm NS, Forbes NA, Dutton TAG, Froehlich F, De Bellis F.(2018). Superficial Chronic Ulcerative Dermatitis (SCUD) in Psittacine Birds: Review of 11 Cases (2008-2016). J Avian Med Surg. 2018 Mar;32(1):25-33. doi: 10.1647/2017-250. PMID: 29698080.
 Adzitey F, Teye GA,  Anachinaba IA. (2015). Microbial quality of fresh and smoked guinea fowl meat sold in the Bolgatanga Municipality, Ghana. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 9: 165-171.
Ali Y, Md A, Islam NH, Muzahid MO, Sikder MdA, Hossain LWM. (2017). Characterization, prevalence and antibiogram study of Staphylococcus aureus in poultry. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed 7(3): 253–256.
 Amen O, Hussein AG, Sayed AM, Ibrahim RS. (2019). Detection of antibiotics resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from poultry farms. Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 65 No. 163 October 2019, 1-9.
 Azevedo H, Brito PP, Fukuma HT , Roque CV ,   Custódio  W,   Kodama Y,   Miya NTN and Pereira J L (2009). Effect of different ionizing radiation dose rates on the staphylococcal enterotoxin in mechanically deboned chicken meat. International Nuclear Atlantic Conference - INAC 2009 Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil, September 27 to October 2, Associação brasileira de energia nuclear - Aben ISBN: 978- 85-99141-03-8 INAC, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Bakheet AA, Omar A, Sayed HAH, Samah FD. (2018). Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus In Broiler Chickens with Special Reference to Beta-Lactam Resistance Genes in the Isolated Strains . AJVS. Vol. 57 (2): 25-33. April 2018 DOI: 10.5455/ajvs.297627.
 
Becker K, Ballhausen B, Kahl BC, Köck R. (2017). The clinical impact of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of the clonal complex 398 for humans. Vet Microbiol. 2017 Feb;200 :33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.11.013. Epub  Nov 22. PMID: 26644311.
Bertolatti DFG, Brien O,  Grubb WB.  (2003). Characterization of drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from poultry processing plants in Western Australia. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 13:43-45. doi 10.1080/0960312021000063322.
 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2022). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. M100 32nd Edition. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
Do Carmo LSC, Cummings VR, Linardi RS, Dias JM, De Suoza MJ, De Sena DA, Dos Santos JW, Shupp RK, Pereira, Jett M. (2004). A cause of massive Staphylococcal food poisoning incident. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 1:241-246,     PMID: 15992286 DOI: 10.1089/fpd.1.241.
EC No. 1441/2007. COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1441/2007of 5 December 2007. Amending Regulation (EC) No. 2073/2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs (Text with EEA relevance. Official Journal of the European Union. 7.12.2007. L 322/13.
 Eid SAS, Erfan AM. (2013). Characterization of E. coli associated with high mortality of poultry flocks. Assiut Vet. Med. J., 59 (139).
 
Elmossalamy DA, Hamdy MM, Aideia HAM, Yassien NA and Zaki HMBA, (2020). Incidence of Staphylococcus aureus and its enterotoxins in chicken meat and its products. Int J Vet Sci, 9(4): 573-577. www.ijvets.com (©2020 IJVS. All rights reserved).
 
Fetsch A, Johler S. (2018 ). Current Clinical Microbiology Reports 5, 88-96. https://link.springer.com/journal/40588/volumes-and-issues/5-2. Food Prot. 52:267–282.
 Gad MG. (2004). Microbiological evaluation of poultry meat and its product. MVSc (Meat Hygiene), Fact Vet Med Sadat University.
Halpin-Dohnalek MI,  Marth EH.  (1989). Staphylococcus aureus: production of extracellular compounds and behaviour in foods—a review. J.
Hassan-Aisha HA. (2007). Microbial evaluation of some cooked and half cooked chicken products with special reference to the enterotoxigenic staph. aureus. PhD Thesis (Meat Hygiene), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Benha Branch.
Lukášová J, Šustáčková A. (2003). Enterococci and antibiotic resistance. (2003): Acta Vet Brno, 72(2):315–323. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274805799_Enterococci_and_Antibiotic_Resistance.
Mamza SA, Egwu GO, Mshelia GD. (2010). Beta-lactamase Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from chickens in Nigeria. Vet Ital. Apr-Jun;46(2):155-65. PMID: 20560125.
 Martín MC, Fueyo JM, González-Hevia MA, Mendoza MC. (2004): Genetic procedures for identification of enterotoxigenic strains of Staphylococcus aureus from three food poisoning outbreaks. Int J Food Microbiol. Aug 1;94(3):279-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.01.011. PMID: 15246239.
Masdooq AA, Salihu AE, Muazu A, Ali H, Ngbede J, Haruna G, Sugun MY. (2008). Pathogenic Bacteria Associated with Respiratory Disease in Poultry with Reference to Pasteurella multocida. International Journal of Poult  Science. 7. 10.3923/ijps.674.675.
Mehrotra M, WANG G, Johnson WM. (2000). Multiplex PCR for Detection of Genes for Staphylococcus aureus Enterotoxins, Exfoliative Toxins, Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin 1, and Methicillin Resistance. journal of clinical microbiology. vol. 38, no. 3.
 
NCCLS (2002). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twelfth M100-S12. Informational supplement. Wayne, PA: NCCLS.
Olimpia P, Giuseppe B, Francesca B, Marilena A, Maria A, Francesco V. (2006). Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcal Enterotoxin A in Breaded Chicken Products: Detection and Behavior during the Cooking Process. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, Nov., p. 7057–7062 Vol. 72, No. 11. 0099-2240/06/$08.00_0 doi:10.1128/AEM.00198-06.
Quinn PJ, Markey BK, Carter ME, Donnelly WJ, Leonard FC. (2002). Vet. Micr. Microbial Dis., A Blackwell Science.
Rashid  N, Shafeeb M, Iqbalc S, Samadb A, Khanb SA, Hasnid MS, Rehmand ZU, Ullahe S, Rehmana FU, Khana GI, Ahmada S, Akbara A. (2021).  Enterotoxigenic methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus contamination in salted fish from Gwadar Balochistan.  Brazilian Journal of Biology, vol. 83, e247701. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.247701. e-mail: aliakbar.uob@gmail.com.
Saleh M, Seedorf J, Hartung J. (2003). Total count of bacteria in the air of three different laying hen housing systems DTW. Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift. Sep;110(9):394-397. PMID: 14560449.
Todar K. (2008). Todar’s Online Textbook of Bacteriology, University department in Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Wafaa AA. (2021). Staphylococcus aureus in poultry, with special emphasis on methicillin-resistant strain infection: A comprehensive review from one health perspective. Int. J. One Health, 7(2): 257-267. www.doi.org/10.14202/IJOH.2021.257-267.
Weese JS.  (2010). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals. ILAR J. 2010;51(3):233-44. doi: 10.1093/ilar.51.3.233. PMID: 21131724.
White DGS, Ayers JJ, Maurer SG, Thayer, Hofacre C. (2003). Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from commercial broilers in Northeastern Georgia. Avian Dis. 47:203-210. https://doi.org/10.1637/0005-2086(2003)047[0203:ASOSAI]2.0.CO;2.
 Wu XL, Su YC. (2014). Growth of Staphylococcus aureus and enterotoxin production in pre-cooked tuna meat. Food Control 42, 63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont..01.039.
 Zeaki N, Cao R, Skandamis PN, Rådströ, P, Schelin J. (2014). Assessment of high and low enterotoxin A producing Staphylococcus aureus strains on pork sausage. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 182–183, 44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.05.010.