Bacteriological and Molecular Studies on Johne’s Disease in Cattle

Document Type : Original researches

Abstract

Paratuberculosis or Johne’s Disease (JD) is a chronic and incurable granulomatous enteric disease affecting cattle, buffaloes, sheep, goats and the other ruminants caused by M. avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP). In this study, A total of 300 cows (240 clinically diseased animals and 60 apparently healthy animals) were examined for the presence of clinical signs of johne's disease including incurable chronic diarrhoea, interment firstly then intense and continuous which is not responding to treatment, emaciation and progressive weakness. Fecal and serum samples (each of 300) were collected from the examined cows housed in 3 Egyptian Governorates (Sharkia, Kalyoubia and Giza). Fecal samples were collected then examined according to the pooling procedure and decontaminated by Hexa decylpyridinium chloride solution (HPC 0.9% prior to culturing on Herrold's Egg Yolk Medium (HEYM). MAP was isolated from 34 of the 60 pooled fecal samples tested (57%). Fecal smears were examined using Ziehl- Neelsen stain (ZN) for the presence of acid fast bacilli revealing 29 fecal smears (48%) of 60 fecal smears were positive. ELISA was conducted on serum samples to detect antibodies against MAP, 212 (71%) of serum samples were positive for antibodies against MAP. Molecular confirmation by PCR IS900 assay was carried out using specific primers directly on fecal sample, Out of the 60 pooled fecal samples, 45 pools (75%) were positive.
A phylogenetic analysis for determining the genetic difference between current infection and other infected strains in other localities was conducted.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Bacteriological and molecular studies on johne’s disease in cattle

 El-Gedawy, A. A.* , Yousry A.El-Shazly**

* Bacteriology department  , Animal health research institute .Egypt .

**Veterinary hospital, faculty of vet. Med.,Zagazig university.

 

Abstract:

 

Paratuberculosis or johne’s disease (JD) is a chronic and incurable granulomatous enteric disease

affecting cattle, buffaloes, sheep, goats and the other ruminants caused by M.avium subspecies

paratuberculosis (MAP) . In this study, A total of 300 cows (240 clinically diseased animals and

60 apparently healthy animals) were examined for the presence of clinical signs of johne's disease

including incurable chronic diarrhoea, interment firstly then intense and continuous which is not

responding to treatment, emaciation and progressive weakness. Fecal and serum samples (each of 300)

were collected from the examined cows housed in 3 Egyptian Governorates (Sharkia, Kalyoubia

and Giza). Fecal samples were collected then examined according to the pooling procedure and

decontaminated by Hexa decylpyridinium chloride solution (HPC 0.9%) prior to culturing on

Herrold's  Egg Yolk Medium (HEYM). MAP was isolated from 34 of the 60 pooled fecal samples

tested (57%). Fecal smears were examined using Ziehl - Neelsen stain (ZN) for the presence of acid

fast bacilli revealing 29 fecal smears (48%) of 60 fecal smears were positive. ELISA was conducted

on serum samples to detect antibodies against MAP, 212 (71%) of serum samples were positive for

antibodies against MAP. Molecular confirmation by PCR IS900 assay was carried out using specific

primers directly on fecal sample, Out of  the 60 pooled fecal samples, 45 pools (75%) were positive.

Aphylogenetic analysis for determining the genetic difference between current infection and other

infected strains in other localities was conducted.

Key words: Paratuberculosis - Johne’s disease-Cattle- diarrhea.

1.Introduction:

Johne’s disease is a chronic infectious enteric disease of ruminant where M.avium subspecies

paratuberculosis is the causative agent of the disease. It is a slow growing, Gram-positive and acid-fast bacterium that requires several months of incubation (Norton  et al.,2010) .The infection is typically characterized by long incubation period followed by chronic progressive diarrhoea, decrease in milk yield, submandibular edema, anemia, loss of weight leading to cachexia and finally to death (Cocito et al., 1994, Harris and Barletta, 2001). Animals are infected by ingestion of food and water contaminated by feces of infected animals (Ahmed et al.,2019). The intrauterine transmission of Map may occur in cattle  and  could  represent  an  important source of infection (Belo-Reis et al., 2016). The incidence of subclinical cases shedding organisms intermittently may be as high as 15%.Calves are susceptible but don’t show signs until adulthood. JD is ranked as a notifiable  disease  in  many  countries (Kennedy, 2001). The prolonged incubation period of the disease (2-10 years) and the act that many animals may harbor the organism without ever showing clinical symptoms have made the diagnosis of latent cases difficult. Meanwhile, the  lack  of  any  specific  chemotherapeutic agent, together with the vaccination drawbacks has made the disease particularly difficult to control. (Mckenna et al., 2006 and Barry etal., 2011).Studies are carried out mostly on cattle , so little is knownabout paratuberculosis in buffalo, Hence a more comprehensive studies of MAP in buffaloes is of a great value to facilitate the design of prevention and control programs.Although the diagnosis of JD remains difficult; there is a wide range of tests for diagnosis of johne’s disease. Bacteriologic fecal culture   remains the most definitive test for identification of both subclinically and clinically infected animals. This fecal culture is time consuming , requiring a long incubation period of 8 to more than 16  weeks for bacterial recovery. This causes problems for producers who need to make quickdecisions for the purchase or replacement animals or to cull the  infected animals from their herds (Abd-E l Malek S. et al., 2015) The sensitivity of  the Ziehl Neelsen test has been estimated at 49% (Zimmer et al., 1999) in clinically affected animals.The specificity of the ZN -test was estimated at 83% (Ris et al., 1988) in fecal culture -negative animals from paratuberculosis free herds.Concerning control programs, ELISA is widely used screening assay for the detection of anti-bodies against MAP in blood or milk because of their advantages like easy performance, high capacity and low costs. PCR technique is a more rapid test which could be an alternative to  the  time  consuming  traditional  cultural method (Douarre et al., 2010). PCR test has led to increase specificity and sensitivity of detection  of  low  shedders. (Collins , M.T. and Sockett, D.C. 1993; Whittington, 2001; Mason et al., 2001 and Behr and Collins, 2010).Mycobacterium avium sub species paratuberculosis may have public health importance as clinical similarities have been observed between Johne’s disease in animals and Crohn’s disease (CD) in humans and both  viable MAP and MAP genetic material have been found in some patients diagnosed with Crohn’s disease despite almost 100 years of investigation, conflicting data still occur and the responsibility of MAP  as  the  etiological  agent  of  CD  was proven in some reports and denied by others. M.avium subspecies paratuberculosis has been isolated  from  Crohn’s  patient  tissue  world-wide. Inspite of that , many laboratories are still reporting their inability to culture it at all , as some human isolates may take up to 6 years to grow even under standard culture and de-contamination conditions (Collins et al., 2000 and Parrish et al., 2008).

This study aimed to through light on paratuberculosis in Egyptian buffaloes as there is lack of data about this disease in Egypt and it was achieved   through   isolation   of MAP   on HEYM’s  medium from pooled fecal samples, identification of the MAP organism by Ziehl Neelsen stain of fecal smears, detection of antibodies to MAP in serum samples by indirect ELISA and IS900 PCR technique. as well as to construct a phylogenetic analysis for determining the genetic difference between current infection and other infected strains in other localities.

2. Material and Methods:

2.1. Animals

Animals were suffering from incurable chronic diarrhoea, interment firstly then intense and continuous which is not responding to treatment,  emaciation  and  progressive  weakness and apparently healthy animals went through general  clinical  examination  parameters  including rectal temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate and body condition score.

 

2.2. Samples:

A total of 600 random samples (300 fecal samples and 300 serum samples) were collected from

Three Governorate (Sharkia, Kalyoubia and Giza). Fecal samples were collected and either directly proceesed or kept frozen in -20◦C till processing.

Blood samples were drawn in serum vacutainer without anticoagulant and kept in icebox waiting to be sent to the laboratory. Separated serum was kept frozen in (-20 ◦C) till examination.

2.3. Pooling, Decontamination and cultivation procedures:

Fecal samples were examined on the basis of a strategic pooling procedure (Kalis et al., 2000).  The

pooled fecal sample was decontaminated  according to (Fernàndez-Silva et al., 2011).  Then  inoculated  onto Herrold’s egg yolk medium (HEYM)  slants supplemented with mycobactin J(Oxid)

Slants were incubated at 37◦C in horizontal position for 1 week with the caps loosened to allow ab-sorption and evaporation of residual moisture on the surface of the medium. Then, caps were tightened and the tubes were returned to vertical position and incubated for 8-16 weeks and checked at 1-2 weeks intervals. The tubes were being checked for growth of gray white rough colonies. Smears were taken from the suspected samples for microscopical examination

2.4. Identification of MAP by Ziehl - Neelsen  staining of direct fecal smearFecal

It was conducted according to(Australian and New Zealand standard diagnostic procedures, 2002).

2.5. Indirect ELISA for detection of MAP antibodies in serum samples:

The presence of MAP antibodies was detected in  serum  samples  using  the  PARACHEK2 (Mycobacterium   paratuberculosis   test   kit), (Prionics AG Wagistrasse 27a-8952 Schlieren-

Zurich, Switzerland) .

 

2.6. Molecular MAP confirmation by using PCR IS900:

DNA  extraction  was  carried  out    using QIAamp DNA stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany)  .Nucleotide sequences of PCR primers fordetection of MAP-specific IS900 were defined in table (1).

Table (1). Nucleotide sequences of PCR primers fordetection of MAP-specific IS900

 

Target gene

Oligonucleotide sequence (5'-3')

Expected amplicon size (bp)

 

IS900

F:CCG CTA ATT GAG AGA TGC GAT TGG

R:AAT CAA CTC CAG CAG CGC GGC CTC

229

(Vary et al.,1990)

 Amplification of IS900 MAP was performed on Bio-Rad T100 Thermal cycler (Hercules, CA, USA) with a 60 ng of DNA template, 12.5 µl of Emerald master mix (Takara, Japan) and 2 µl of forward and reverse primer for MAP IS900 .PCR was started with  an initial denaturation step at 94ºc for 10 minutes, then followed by 35 cycles of denaturation for 60 seconds at 94 ºc, annealing for 90 seconds at 61 ºC and extension for 60 seconds at 72 ºC. PCR products were then run on gel electrophoresis (2%) for visualization of the amplified PCR product. The required product size was optimized using a 100bp DNA ladder (Jena bioscience, Germany) .

2.7 Sequencing and analysis :

Purification of DNA fragment was carried out with Gene JET Gel extraction kit (Thermo Scientific, Lithuania). The purified DNA products were then sent for sequencing in 3130 X DNA Sequencer (Genetic Analyzer, Applied  biosystem, Japan) with both forward and reverse primer used in PCR.

The obtained nucleotide sequence was aligned, trimmed with the aid of ClustalW that was integrated with MEGA 6 softwar.The trimmed DNA samples were   checked on Genbank for determining similarity index between other species of MAP on Genbank.

3. Results3.1.Results of of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis Isolation:

MAP was isolated from 34 of the 60 pooled samples tested (57%). After 16 weeks  of  incubation, Typical colonies of  MAP were observed;  very  small,  convex (hemispherical), soft, non-mucoid and initially colorless and translucent.

Table (2). Results of isolation of fecal culture of MAP on HEYM

 

Governorate

No. of pooled

fecal samples

Total No. of

pooled fecal

samples

No. and percentage(*) of

Positive culture

Total No. and per-

centage of positive

culture

Diseased

animals

Apparently

healthy

Diseased

Apparently

healthy

Sharkia

16

4

20

12 (60%)

1(5%)

13(65%)

Kalyoubia

16

4

20

9 (45%)

1 (5%)

10 (50%)

Giza

16

4

20

11 (55%)

0 (0%)

11(55%)

Total

48

12

60

32

2

34 (57%)

(*) percentage was calculated according to the total number of the pooled fecal samples.

 

3.2. Results of Microscopic  examination  of    Ziehl-Neelsen stained fecal smears:

MAP showed red acid alcohol-fast bacilli. Stained direct fecal smears revealed 29 (48%) of 60

pooled samples were positive as shown in table(3) .

Table (3). Results of ZN fecal smear staining :

 

 

 

 

Governorate

 

No.of pooled samples

 

No. and Percentage(*) of posi-

tive ZN stained fecal smear

 

 

Total No.of Positive ZN

stained fecal smear and

Percentage (%)

Diseased

animals

Apparently

healthy animals

Diseased

animals

Apparently

healthy ani-

mals

Sharkia

16

4

9 (45%)

1 (5%)

10 (50%)

Kalyoubia

16

4

8 (40%)

0 (0%)

8 (40%)

Giza

16

4

10 (50%)

1(5%)

11 (55%)

Total

48

12

29

29(48%)

(*) percentage was calculated according to the total number of the pooled fecal samples.

 

3.3. ELISA assay results

ELISA was carried out individually to all serum samples of culture-positive animals and culture-negative animals. The ELISA results are shown in table (4).

Table (4). Results of indirect ELISA test:

 

 

 

 

Governorate

No. of tested serum samples

 

 

Total No. of

serum sam-

ples

No. and percentage (*)  of

Positive ELISA

 

Total No. and

percentage  of

positive

ELISA

 

Diseased

Apparently

healthy

Diseased

animals

Apparently

healthy

Sharkia

80

20

100

70 (70%)

0 (0%)

70 (70%)

Kalyoubia

80

20

100

60 (60%)

1 (1%)

61 (61%)

Giza

80

20

100

80 (80%)

1 (0%)

81(81%)

Total

240

60

300

210

2

212 (71%)

(*) percentage was calculated according to the total number of the pooled fecal samples.

 

3.4.Results of  IS900 PCR:

Out  of 60 pooled  fecal  samples, 45 pools (75%) as shownin  table (4).  Representative positive samples are shown in figure (1) were L2 and L3 (from Sharkia),L4 and L6 (fromKalyoubia) ,L7 and L8 (from Giza).

 

 

Figure (1): Showing results of IS900 PCR amplicons of  fecal samples

 M: Marker 100pb. Pos: Control positive.L2, L3,L4,L6,L7 and L8: Positive samples.

Neg: Negative control.

Table (5).Results of amplification of MAP IS900 gene by using PCR:

 

 

Governorate

No. of examined samples

 

Total No. of

Examined

samples

Positive PCR (N)

Total No.

of positive

PCR

Diseased ani-

mals

Apparently

healthy ani-

mals

Diseased

animals

Apparently

healthy ani-

mals

Sharkia

16

4

20

14 (70%)

1 (5%)

15 (80%)

Kalyoubia

16

4

20

12(60%)

2 (10%)

14 (70%)

Damietta

16

4

20

15 (75%)

1 (5%)

16 (80%)

Total

48

12

60

41

4

45 (75%)

(*) percentage was calculated according to the total number of the serum  samples in each governorate.

 

3.5. Results of  IS900 sequencing:

The amplification of MAP DNA samples was sequenced, matched and deposited on genbank with accession number of MH663496 and named as Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Egy1. The aligned MAP species are (KY587112, KT075353, KT075351, KT075350, MH663496, KJ173784, JQ837281, EU130943, EF514831, EF536056, EF536046, S74401, AF416985, AF305073, AJ250018, AJ011838, AB052552, AJ250023, AJ251434, AJ250022, X16293, EF536047, AY974347, KT275243, EF536041, FJ775182, AY974346, JN983503, EU232747, EF514825, AF455252, EF536048, EU714039, EF514828, KJ173781, EU232756, EU714041, EU232748, HQ830160, EU057153, EU057170, EU714040, EU232755, KJ882903, HM172613, GQ144322). It showed a 100% identity with MAP strain KVAFSU_S196. Phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2) was divided into two clades  (clade A and B) where our isolated species of MAP was located in subclade B among other related species of M.avium (MAP strain KVAFSU_S196, MAP strain 25, MAP strain steroyl ACP desaturase, MAP strain B42, MAP strain 25C) that was isolated from India. Moreover, pairwise distance showed 0.0009 with our isolated strain. The Indian strain and our Egyptian strain were shown a close genetic distance with high node support. The highest pairwise difference was observed in JQ837281 (1.3 EU130943 (1.4), S74401 (1.3), AJ011838 (1.3) and KT275243 (1.4). Those species were located in different localities in Australia, India, United Kingdom and in Egypt..

 

Fig. 2: Phylogenetic analysis of different strains of MAP infection with our isolated strain"blue rectangle". phylogenetic tree was divided into two clades; clade A and clade B. Clade A was subdivided into two sub clades A and B where our isolated sequence (Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis EGY1) was located (sub-clade B)

 

4. Discussion

Johne's disease (JD) is caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. Infections normally affect ruminants but have also been seen  in  a  variety  of  nonruminant  species,  including  rabbits,  foxes, birds, horses, dogs, and non-human primates have been infected also. JD primarily affects the intestine of all wild and domestic ruminants including cattle, goats, sheep, camels, Ilamas, giraffes, bison, buffaloes, deer and antelopes (Whittington et al. 2011) and (Kamel etal.,2016).The disease has been also recorded in a variety of non-ruminant species  including  rabbits,  foxes,  birds,  horses, donkeys, dogs, cats, pigs, and non-human pri-mates (Beard et al. 2001; Glanemannet al. 2008 ,Stief et al. 2012 and Ahmed et al.,2019).Clinical  signs  of JD  including  wasting, chronic intermittent diarrhoea ,emaciation, decrease in net body weight and milk yield. Animals are infected by ingestion of food and water contaminated by feces of infected individuals(Philip Rasmussen et al., 2021).Shedding of infectious agent usually occured from clinical cases in spite ofthe incidence of subclinical cases shedding organisms intermittently may be as high as 15%.Studies are carried out mostly on cattle. Understanding the dynamics of the disease is the key element of control as there's lack ofpractical therapeutic approaches and lack of avaccine  that  prevents  transmission  and  the complexity and difficulty of the on farm control strategies genders the prevention of infection (Behr and Collins, 2010). More recently evidence has accumulated for an association of MAP with Crohn's disease in humans, adding to the pressure on animal healthauthorities to take precautions to control paratuberculosis. JD has been reported in almost every continent. Studies from various parts of the world have shown the widespread distribution of the disease. It is mainly a problem reported in Australia, Canada, Argentina, USA, Mexico, Brazil, New Zealand, Denmark, Belgium, Norway, Switzerland, Netherlands, France, Spain, Germany,   England,   Scotland,   Ireland,   Italy, Greece, Thailand, India, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Egypt, Morocco and South Africa. However, Sweden and some states in Australia are the only regions that claimed to be free from the disease (Bauerfeind et al. 1996; Moreira etal. 1999; Pavlik et al. 1999; Machackova et al. 2004; Salem et al. 2005; Palmer et al. 2005 and carvalho et al. 2009).Fecal culture is the most practical mean of confirming infection in herd screening programs. Although fecal culture is technically difficult and  time consuming (Van  schaik  et  al.,2003).The pooling of fecal samples from more than one animal for culture is a logical way to reduce the cost of detection of MAP at herd level and this observation is in accordance with that mentioned by (Whittington et al., 2001; Van Schaik et al., 2003 and Kalis et al., 2004).

Current diagnostic tests consider the culture as the gold standard method (Paolicchi  et al., 2003).

One of the goals of this study was to evaluate diagnostic  methods  for  MAP  diagnosis  in cattle. The tests used to diagnose MAP were carried out in parallel to each other. Pooled fecal samples were cultured   using   Herrold's   egg   yolk   medium(HEYM) supplemented withmycobactin J as the egg based media (LJM & HEYM) are the first choice for culture of clinical and environmental samples (Moravoka et al., 2012). The result of the culture was 34 positive  slants of the 60 pooled  fecal  samples  tested (57%) which were collected from three Egyptian governorates (Sharkia, Kalyoubia and Damietta). After 16 weeks of incubation on herrold's media containing egg yolk slope,Positive slants show typical colonies of MAP; very small, convex (hemispherical), soft, non mucoid and initially colorless & translucent. Colonies become bigger, more raised, opaque, off-white cream to buff or beige coloured as incubation continues. Negative slants should not be disposed until 10 months pass as some slants, took about 9 months to observe typical colonies. and our result was almost near the findings of Gamaal (2014), as she reported the result of culture was 34 of the 50 pooled samples tested (68%). The low sensitivity of fecal culture could be due to intermittent shedding of causative agent in the feces (Stabel, 1997) or due to substantial decrease in the bacterial load during   specimen decontamination   protocol (Reddacliff et al., 2003) and as reported by Visser (1999), fecal culture may not necessarily give positive results in animals shedding low numbers of MAP in their feces.Stained fecal smears using Z.N stain were examined microscopically and revealed that 29 (48%)of the 60 pooled samples were positive as it showed  the presence of acid fast bacilli at microscopic examination .Despite   the   noticeable   low   figures   of sensitivity and specificity of  ELISA (Enzymelinked immunosorbent assay ), It is considered

as the method of choice for the detection of J.D. positive herds. This is due to the suitability of samples collection, rapid laboratory turnaround time. Low cost, and possibility to test a large number of samples in a short time (Muskens et al., 2003; Böttcher and Gangl 2004; Collins, 2011). In this study, Serum samples of  diseased individuals and apparently healthy animals were examined by indirect ELISA for  detection of antibodies against MAP where 212 (71%) out of 300 serum samples were positive and 88 serum samples were negative at a percentage  of (29%)  .  All  individual  animals which were positive ELISA for MAP were in the positive pooled fecal cultures. (Weber et al.,2009) reported that the result of positive ELISA. serum samples were 57%. The use of ELISA in longstanding infected herds reveals reasonable sensitivity as the antibodies become more abundant in later stages of the disease (McKenna etal. 2006). The specificity of the test is markedly increased by the absorption with sonicates from other mycobacteria like Mycobacterium phlei in the so-called absorbed ELISA where specificity reaches 99-100% and sensitivity  reaches 53-55% (Böttcher   and Gangl 2004 and Shin et al., 2008).

El Gedawy et al. (2015) recommended the use of both fecal culture method and indirect ELISA as laboratory methods in diagnosis and control programmes of paratuberculosis.In this study,  Molecular MAP confirmation was done by Conventional PCR technique using specific IS900 primers. Recently, the PCR technique as a powerful tool in the microbiological diagnosis of different pathogens led to its extensive application in the diagnosis of JD .The IS900 is commonly used as an abundant reference marker for the molecular detection of M. avium subspecies paratuberculosis (Herthnek  and G. Boelske2006).  Many publication sconsidered the PCR assay as rapid and powerful tool to amplify DNA of MAP and as a confirmatory test (Whittington, 2001 and Mason et al., 2001). In this study,  From Each governorate, 2o pooled fecal samples  representing apparently healthy cases  and  pooled fecal samples representing the diseased cases were examined. Out of the 60 pooled fecal samples,45 pools (75%) were positive; as the DNA amplification gave a fragment size of 229 on 1.5% agarose electrophoresis) (photo (1). All positive cultured fecal pools were PCR positive although not all PCR positive samples were culture positive. Reduced sensitivity of PCR results can be due to inefficient extraction of mycobacterial DNA from fecal samples, particularly in low count microbial loaded samples and /or as a consequence of the presence of PCR inhibitors. (Thornton  and  Passen 2004). Also, it is known that fecal samples  are very difficult to process and IS900 sequence was  detected  also  in  mycobacterial  strains other than M. avium subspecies paratuberculosis. (Englund et al., 2002). So the specificity of IS900 diagnostic PCR  has been questioned

since some reports indicated the presence of IS900-like sequences in mycobacterial species other than MAP (Satoko Kawaji et al 2020)

The amplified MAP DNA  sequence showed a 100% identity with MAP strain KVAFSU_S196. Phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2) was divided into two clades  (clade A and B) where our isolated species of MAP was located in subclade B among other related species of M.avium (MAP strain KVAFSU_S196, MAP strain 25, MAP strain steroyl ACP desaturase, MAP strain B42, MAP strain 25C) that was isolated from India. Moreover, pairwise distance showed 0.0009 with our isolated strain. The Indian strain and our Egyptian strain were shown a close genetic distance with high node support. The highest pairwise difference was observed in JQ837281 (1.3) EU130943 (1.4), S74401 (1.3), AJ011838 (1.3) and KT275243 (1.4). Those species were located in different localities in Australia, India, United Kingdom and in Egypt..

The obtained sequence of IS900 was identical to a sequence that was isolated from India (KY587112), while it was showing a higher difference when compared with other strains from Egypt (KJ173784 and KJ173784), although they were isolated from the fecal matter of cattle. In the two strains from Egypt, our isolated strain of MAP showed 98% similarity index, but was named as transposase sequence where it is responsible for transposition of gene in prokaryotes. Insertion sequence regulates gene transposition . On the contrary, another isolated sample from Egypt (JN983503) was isolated from fecal matter of bovine species would find to share higher than 99% similarity index with our obtained sequence. Ahmed et al.,2019 concluded that the use of IS900 had been used extensively for studying MAP in domestic animals . PCR positive result of MAP for IS900 can be used correctly in the identification of the causative agent for Johne's disease . Different sequences for IS900 were deposited in Genbank, besides the original sequence isolated from United Kingdom (X16293)  with a product size of around 1500 bp which showed a change in a nucleotide sequence of our obtained sequence with a pair wise genetic difference of

0.009 ,Philip A Robinson (2020) .

5.Conclusion:

It could be concluded that the infection with the clinical form has a serious significant impact on the health of cows and the production of Egyptian dairy farms. Studyingthe disease economic impact might provide a greater impact with an insight into the cost efficiency of detection and screening for subclinical infections, which could help in prevention the new infections and also improve the health and productivity of the herd.The use of both fecal culture method and indirect ELISA as laboratory methods in diagnosis and control programmes of paratuberculosis is recommended.  Molecular MAP studies  using specific IS900 primers are commonly used as an abundant reference marker for the molecular detection of M. avium subspecies paratuberculosis.

Further investigations andmore studies are needed to understand the dynamics and the epidemiology of the disease, helping in the development of the on farm control strategies to prevent the infection and limit this hidden threat as it cause important economic losses in ruminants  losses  due  to  examination,  treatment costs, loss of milk production and animals culling.Veterinary authorities should work on offering data about the prevalence of Paratuberculosis on the national scale for the different animal species.

 

 

 

 

6. Reference

References
1-Abd El-Malek S., Kh. F. Mohammed,  R.Soliman,  M.  El  Hariri (2015).
Comparison of the sensitivity of different primers used for identification of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates recovered from clinically suspected cases. Int. J. of Sci. Tech. and management Vol. 4, issue 09.
2-Ahmed Abdelaal ,Magdy Elgioushy,  Shaimaa Goudaa , Mohamed El-Adl ,    , Emad A.Hashishd,Shimaa A. Elgamld,Mayar O.Ali ,Attia  Abd ullah (2019). Hemato-biochemical and molecular markers (IS900) of cattle infected with Johne's disease in Egypt .Slov Vet Res 2019; 56 (Suppl 22): 421–31
3-Australian and New Zealand Standard Diagnostic Procedures, April (2002). (http://www.scahls.org.au/Procedures/Documents/ ANZSDP/jd1.pdf)
4-Barry, C.; Corbett, D.; Bakker, D.; Andersen, P.; McNair, J. and Strain, S. (2011).The  Effect  of Mycobacterium  avium Complex Infections on Routine Mycobacterium bovis Diagnostic Tests. Veterinary Medicine International, 2011, 145092-145100.
5-Bauerfeind, R.; Benazzi, S.; Weiss, R.; Schliesser,  T.;  Willems,  H.  and  Baljer,  G. (1996). Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium   paratuberculosis   isolates   from sheep, goats, and cattle by hybridization with a DNA probe to insertion element IS900. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 34, 1617-
1621.
6-Beard, P.M.; Daniels, M.J. and Henderson, D. (2001). Paratuberculosis infection of nonruminant wildlife in Scotland. J. Clin. Microbiol., 39: 1517 - 1521.
7-Behr, M.A. and Collins, D.M. (2010). Paratuberculosis: Organism, Disease, Control.CAB
International 2010, Wallingford, Oxfordshir, UK
8-Belo-Reis,,  A.S.;  Salvarani,  F.M.;  Brito, M.F.; Fonseca, A.A.; Silva, N.S.; Silveira,J.A.S.; Reis, J.K.P.; Silva, J.B.; Oliveira, C.M.C. and Barbosa, J.D. (2016). Intrauterine   Infection   by   Mycobacterium   avium subsp. paratuberculosis in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). J Vet Sci. Med. Diagn 2016, 5: 10
9-Böttcher, J. and Gangl, A. (2004). Mycobacterium avium ssp. Paratuberculosis combined serological testing and classification of individual animals and herds. Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health, 51, 443-448
10-Carvalho, I.A.; Silva, A.; Jr., Campos, V.E. and Moreira, M.A. (2009). Short communication:   detection   of   Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction in bovine milk in Brazil. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 5408-5410
11-Cocito, C.; Gilot, P.; Coene, M.; De Kesel, M.; Poupart, P. and Vannuffel, P. (1994).
Paratuberculosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 7(3): 328-345.
 
12-Collins, M.T. (2011). Diagnosis of paratuberculosis. Veterinary Clinics of North America:
Food Animal Practice, 27, 581-91
13-Collins, M.T.; Lisby, G.; Moser, C.; Chicks, D.;  Christensen,  S.;  Reichelderfer,  M.;Hoiby, N.; Harms, B.A.; Thomsen, O.O.; Skibsted, U. and Binder, V. (2000). Results of Multiple Diagnostic Tests for Mycobacterium   avium subsp. paratuberculosis in   Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and in Controls. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 38, 4373-4381.
14-Collins, M.T. and Sockett, D.C. (1993). Ac-curacy and economic of the USDA-licensedenzyme linked immunosorbent assay for bovine paratuberculosis. J. Am Vat Med Assoc., 203: 1456 - 1463.
15-Douarre, P.E.; Cashman, W.; Buckley, J.; Coffey,  A.  and OʼMahony,  J.M. (2010).Isolation  and  detection  of  Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Map) from cattle in Ireland using traditional culture and molecular  based  methods.  Gut  Pathogens. 2:11.
16-El-Gedawy, A.A.; Y.F. El-naker and M.A. Elbeskawy (2015). Diagnosis of Johne’s disease in cattle in some Egyptian governorates with special reference to culture and ELISA methods. Egy. J. of Appl. Sci., 30(4) 2015
17-Englund,  S.  Bolske,  G,  Johansson,  K.E. (2002). An IS900-like sequence found in aMycobacterium sp. other than Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002 Apr 9; 209(2): 267-71.
18-Fernàndez-Silva,  J.A.;  Abdulmawjood,  A. and Bülte, M. (2011). Diagnosis and Molecular Characterization of  Mycobacterium avium  subsp. paratuberculosis  from Dairy Cows  in  Colombia.  Journal  of Veterinary Medicine International, Vol. 2011, Articale ID 352561.
19-Gamaal E.G. (2014). Isolation and Molecular characterization of  Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Ph. D. thesis, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University.
20-Glanemann,   B.;   Schonenbrucher,   H.; Bridger, N.; Abdulmawjood, A.; Neiger,R. and Bulte, M. (2008). TI—Detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis-specific DNA by PCR in intestinal biopsies of dogs. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 4, 1090-1094.
21-Harris,  N.B.  and  Barletta,  R.G. (2001). “Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in veterinary medicine,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 14(3): 489-512.
22-Herthnek, D. and G. Boelske (2006). New PCR systems to confirm real time PCR   detection   of  Mycobacterium   avium   subsp.paratuberculosis J.BMC Microbiology.6: 87.
23-Kalis, C.H.J.; Collins, M.T.; Barkema, H.W. and Hesselink, J.W. (2004). Certifi cationof herds as free of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection: actual pooled faecal results versus certification model predictions. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 65, 189-204.
24-Kalis,  C.H.J.;  Hesselink,  J.W.;  Barkema, H.W. and Collins, M.T. (2000). Culture ofstrategically pooled bovine fecal samples as a method to screen herds for paratuberculosis. J Vet Diagn Invest, 12: 547- 551.
25-Kamel S.M., Samia A. Ahmed , Soliman S.M. , El-Gedawy, A.Aand Y.F. Elnaker.(2016).Role of Mycobacterium avium sub species paratuberculosis in persistant diarrhoea in Egyptian buffaloes .
Animal Health  Research Journal Vol. 4 No. 2, 83-96.
26-Kennedy, D.J. and Benedictus, G. (2001). Control  of  Mycobacterium  avium  subsp.
paratuberculosis  infection   in   agricultural species. Rev. Sci. Tech., 20: 151-179.
27-Machackova, M.; Svastova, P.; Lamka, J.; Parmova,  I.;  Liska,  V.;  Smolik,  J.;
Fischer, O.A. and Pavlik, I. (2004). Paratuberculosis in farmed and free-living wild ruminants in the Czech Republic (1999-2001). Veterinary Microbiology, 101, 225-234
28-Mason O.; Marsh I.B. and Whittington R.J. (2001).  Comparison   of   immunomagnetic
bead  separation-polymerase  chain  reaction and fecal culture for the detection of Mycobacterium avium sub species paratuberculosis in feces. Aust Vet. J., 79: 497-500.
 
29-McKenna,  S.L.;  Keefe,  G.P.;  Tiwari,  A.; Van  Leeuwen,  J.  and  Barkema,  H.W.(2006). Johne's disease in Canada part II: disease impacts, risk factors, and control programs for dairy producers. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 47, 1089-1099.
30-Moravkova,  M.;  Babak,  V.;  Kralova,  A.; Pavlik, I. and  Slana, I. (2012). Cultureand  Quantitative  IS900 Real-Time  PCR- Based Analysis of the Persistence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in a Controlled Dairy Cow Farm Environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 78: 6608-6614.
31-Moreira, A.R.; Paolicchi, F.; Morsella, C.; Zumarraga, M.; Cataldi, A.; Fabiana, B.;Alicia, A.; Piet, O.; Van Soolingen, D. and Isabel, R.M. (1999). Distribution of IS900 restriction  fragment  length  polymorphism types among animal Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates from Argentina and Europe. Veterinary Microbiology, 70, 251-259.
32-Muskens, J.; Mars, M.H.; Elbers, A.R.; Van Maanen, K. and Bakker, D. (2003). Theresults of using faecal culture as confirmation test  of  paratuberculosis-seropositive  dairy cattle. Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious   diseases   and   veterinary   public health, 50, 231-234
33- Norton S, Johnson WO, Jones G, Heuer C (2010) Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests for Johne's Disease (Mycobacterium Avium Subspecies Paratuberculosis) in New Zealand Dairy Cows. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 22 (3):341-351. doi:10.1177/104063871002200301
34-Palmer, M.V.; Stoffregen, W.C.; Carpenter, J.G.  and  Stabel,  J.R. (2005).  Isolation
of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis (Map) from Feral Cats on a Dairy Farm with Map-infected Cattle. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 41, 629-635.
35-Paolicchi, F.A.; Zumarraga, M.J.; Gioffre, A.; Zamorano, P.; Morsella, C.; Verna, A.;Cataldi,  A.;  Alito,  A.  and Romano,  M. (2003). Application of different methods for the diagnosis of paratuberculosis in dairy cattle herd in Argentina. J. Vet. Med. B. Infect. Dis. Vet. Public health. 50(1): 20 - 26.
36-Parrish, N.M.; Radcliff, R.P.;  Brey, B.J.; Anderson,   J.L.;  Clark,   D.L.;  Jr.,Koziczkowski, J.J.; Ko, C.G.; Goldberg, N.D.; Brinker, D.A.; Carlson, R.A.; Dick, J.D. and Ellingson, J.L. (2008). Absence of mycobacterium avium subsp. Paratuberculosis in Crohn's patients.  Inflammatory bowel disease, 15, 556-558.
37-Pavlik,  I.;  Horvathova,  A.;  Dvorska,  L.; Bartl, J.; Svastova, P.; du Maine, R. andRychlik, I. (1999). Standardisation of restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for Mycobacteriumaviumsubspecies paratuberculosis. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 38, 155-167.
38-Philip A Robinson (2020) .Farmer and veterinarian views on drivers for Johne's disease control in dairy herds in England.Preventive Veterinary Medicine 182, 105094.
39-Philip Rasmussen, Herman W Barkema, Steve Mason, Eugene Beaulieu, David C Hall.(2021) .Economic losses due to Johne's disease (paratuberculosis) in dairy cattle.Journal of dairy science 104 (3), 3123-3143.
40-Reddacliff, L.A.; Vadali, A. and Whittington, R.J. (2003). The effect of decontamination protocols on the numbers of sheep strainMycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolated from tissues and faeces. Vet. Mi-crobiol., 95 (4): 271-282.
41-Ris,  D.R.;  Hamel,  K.L.  and Ayling,  J.M. (1988).  The  detection  of  Mycobacterium
paratuberculosis in bovine faeces by isolation and the comparison of isolation with the examination of stained smears by light microscopy. N. Z. Vet. J. 36, 112-114.
42-Salem, M.; Zeid, A.A.; Hassan, D.; El-Sayed A. and Zschoeck, M. (2005). Studies onJohneʼs disease in Egyptian Cattle. Journal of Vet. Med. Series B 52: 134 - 137.
44-Satoko Kawaji, Reiko Nagata, Yasutaka Minegishi. Yumi Saruvama. Akiko Mita Shingo (2020).
A novel real-time PCR-based screening test with pooled fecal samples for bovine Johne's disease.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 58 (12), e01761 20.
45-Shin, S.J.; Cho, D. and Collins, M.T. (2008).Diagnosis of Bovine Paratuberculosis by a Novel Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay   Based   on   Early   Secreted   Antigens of Mycobacterium  avium subsp.  paratuberculosis. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 15, 1277-1281
46-Stabel J.R. (1997). An improved method for cultivation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine fecal samples and comparison to three other methods. J Vet Diagn Invest 9:375-380.
47-Stief, B.; Mobius, P.; Turk, H.; Horugel, U.; Arnold,   C.   and   Pohle,   D. (2012).[Paratuberculosis  in  a  miniature  donkey (Equus   asinus   f.   asinus)].  Berliner   und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift, 125, 38-44.
48-Thornton, C.G. and Passen, S. (2004). Inhibition of PCR amplification by phytic acid,and treatment of bovine fecal specimens with phytase  to  reduce  inhibition.  Journal  of Microbiological Methods, 59, 43-52.
49-Van Schaik, G.; Stehman, M.S.; Schukken, H.Y.; Rossiter, R.C. and Shin, J.S. (2003).Pooled fecal culture sampling for Mycobacterium avium Subsp. paratuberculosis at different herd sizes and prevalence. J. VET Diagn Invest. 15(3): 233-241.
50-Vary, P.H.; Andersen, P.R. and Green, E. (1990). Use of highly specific DNA probesand the polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in Johne’s disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28, 933-937.
51-Visser, I. (1999). Reproducibility of a fecal culture method for Mycobacterium paratuberculosis.  Proceedings of the 6th  Interna-tional colloquium on paratuberculosis, Australia, pp. 41.
52-Weber, M.F.; J. Verhoeff; G. Van Schaik, and C. Van Maanen (2009). Evaluation of Ziehl-Neelsen   stained   faecal   smear   and ELISA as tools for surveillance of clinical paratuberculosis in cattle in the Netherlands. Prev. Vet. Med., 92: 256-266.
53-Whittington,  R.J.;  Marsh,  I.B.;  Saunders, V.; Grant, I.R.; Juste, R.; Sevilla, I.A.;Manning, E.J.; and Whitlock, R.H. (2011).Culture phenotypes of genomically and geographically  diverse  Mycobacterium  avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates from different hosts. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 49, 1822-1830.
54-Whittington,  R.J.  and   Sergeant,  E.S.G. (2001). Progress towards understanding thespread, detection and control of Mycobacterium avium subsp. Paratuberculosis in animal populations. Aust Vet. J., 4: 267 - 278.
55-Zimmer,  K.;  Drager,  K.G.;  Klawonn,  W. and Hess, R.G. (1999). Contribution to the
diagnosis of Johneʼs disease in cattle. Comparitive  studies  on  the  validity  of  Zeihl-Neelsen staining, faecal culture and a commercially available DNA probe test in detect-ing Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in feces from cattle. Zentralbl Vet. Med. B., 46(2): 137 - 140.